1 / 17

Analysis of Alternatives Decision Brief to the SPSRB Instructions / Guidance

This template is used to present an analysis of alternatives to the SPSRB, providing information for decision-making. It includes sections on integrated product teams, requirements, capabilities assessment, technology improvement plan, and recommended options.

obrienr
Download Presentation

Analysis of Alternatives Decision Brief to the SPSRB Instructions / Guidance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis of Alternatives Decision Brief to the SPSRB Instructions / Guidance • This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to present an analysis of alternatives to the SPSRB. • The Analysis of Alternatives Decision brief will be assigned a suspense data for completion by the SPSRB Process Improvement Working Group (SPI WG). • Send briefing to Priyanka.Roy@noaa.gov and info copy Eileen.Maturi@noaa.gov, and David.R.Donahue@noaa.gov • The template is a guide and may require tailoring. However, adherence to the briefing outline is recommended because it ensures the SPSRB is presented the information needed to make decisions. • Guidance is contained in the notes page. You can access the notes page by selecting “View” and “Notes Page” from the main menu. • The SPSRB may request an Analysis of Alternatives Decision Brief to be presented to the SPSRB. Follow the SPSRB guidance and if you have any questions, ask your division chief. • Delete this slide before you send your briefing to the SPSRB secretaries V7 July 22, 2015

  2. Analysis of AlternativesFor “Title” SPSRB Decision Brief Presenter: Name and office IPT Lead: Name and office Month day, year V7 July 22, 2015

  3. Outline • Integrated Product Team (IPT) • Requirement(s) • Capabilities Assessment • Technology Improvement Plan • Analysis of Alternatives • Key Assumptions • Product Development and Implementation Options • Recommended Option • SPSRB Decision V7 July 22, 2015

  4. Integrated Product Team (IPT) • IPT Lead: • IPT Backup Lead: • NESDIS Team: • STAR: • OSPO: • OSGS: • NCEI: • Others: • User Team • Lead: • Others: • Oversight Panel (OP) lead: • Other OPs involved: V7 July 22, 2015

  5. Requirement(s) • Requirement(s) • SPSRB requirement number, title and summary of requirement • Date of Initial Technical Assessment and SPSRB decision • Others • User community • Benefit to user • NOAA Mission Goal supported: • Mission priority: V7 July 22, 2015

  6. Capabilities Assessment V7 July 22, 2015

  7. Shortfalls • Current Operational Shortfalls • Timeliness • Accuracy of Product • Define how product development addresses shortfalls • Benefit • Impact if not funded V7 July 22, 2015

  8. Technology Improvement Plan V7 July 22, 2015

  9. Option Analysis • Key assumptions • Summary of options V7 July 22, 2015

  10. Option #, “title” • Concept of operations overview • Capability • Benefit to the user community V7 July 22, 2015

  11. Dissemination User System Backup ESPC h/w, ftp? h/w? Operational ESPC h/w ? ESPC h/w? Development STAR or OSPO h/w? IT System Architecture Ancillary Data Ancillary Data Input Data Includes: ???? V7 July 22, 2015

  12. Option #, “title” Product Delivery/Tracking Name: xxxxxxx • List of products to be delivered: xxx • MMM YY: Development Phase Begins • MMM YY: Pre-operational Phase Begins • MMM YY: Operational Phase Begins V7 July 22, 2015

  13. Option #, “title” • Government Resource Commitments: • STAR • OSPO • OSGS • NCEI • Rough order of magnitude costs (ROM) V7 July 22, 2015

  14. Option #, “title” V7 July 22, 2015

  15. Option #, “title” • Pros • Capability • Cost • Schedule • Others • Cons • Capability • Cost • Schedule • Others V7 July 22, 2015

  16. IPT Recommendation • Recommended Option • Did the IPT reach consensus on this recommendation? • Did the user concur with this recommendation? V7 July 22, 2015

  17. SPSRB Decision • General comments • User input • STAR senior representative input • OSPO senior representative input • OSGS senior representative input • Potential courses of action • Seek additional information from the user • Rework proposal • Draft initial project plan and seek funding • Guidance on forming Integrated Product Team • Seek upper management and/or NOAA board guidance (e.g., NOSC)? • Consensus decision reached? • Yes: summarize decision • No: summarize decision V7 July 22, 2015

More Related