1 / 29

Developing a Shared Decision Making Curriculum

Developing a Shared Decision Making Curriculum. Angela Fagerlin, PhD. So Who Am I To Talk To You About Shared Decision Making Curriculum?. Co-Director of one shared decision making course at the Society of Medical Decision Making.

octavious
Download Presentation

Developing a Shared Decision Making Curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing a Shared Decision Making Curriculum Angela Fagerlin, PhD

  2. So Who Am I To Talk To You About Shared Decision Making Curriculum? • Co-Director of one shared decision making course at the Society of Medical Decision Making. • Will teach the SMDM course again this month as well as a 2nd course for researchers and clinicians at our Veterans Affairs hospitals/research centers. • I teach a 1week (40 hours) course on the development of decision aids.

  3. Co-Director Mary Politi, PhD Assistant Professor Washington University St. Louis, Missouri

  4. Instructors Dominick Frosch, PhD Karen Sepucha, PhD

  5. Year 1: 4 Parts • Introduction / Overview of Shared Decision Making • Psychology of Medical Decision Making • Heuristics and Biases • Risk Communication • Decision Support Interventions • Development • Evaluation • Implementation • Measuring a Quality Decision

  6. Introduction / Background Shared Decision Making Dominick Frosch, PhD

  7. Introduction / Background • Define patient engagement • Relationship of SDM with evidence based medicine • Defining and relating equipoise to shared decision making

  8. Introduction / Background • Steps in shared decision making • Identify situations in which SDM is critical • Acknowledge decision to patient • Describe options, including uncertainty • Elicit / construct preferences and values • Agree on a plan for the next steps • Benefits of shared decision making • Patients • Physicians

  9. Psychology of Medical Decision Making Angela Fagerlin, PhD

  10. Heuristics & Biases • Availability • Framing • Anchoring and adjustment • Default bias • Omission and action biases

  11. Risk Communication • Numeracy • What it is, how bad it is, how crucial it is • Absolute vs. relative risk • Frequencies vs. percentages • Graph communication • Baseline vs. incremental risk • Less is more • The importance of labels

  12. Decision Support Interventions Development and Evaluation Mary Politi, PhD

  13. Decision Support Interventions Development and Evaluation • What are decision support interventions (DESIs)? • What have they been proven to do? • Where is more research needed? • How are DESIs developed? • How are DESIs evaluated? • How are DESIs implemented?

  14. Decision Support Interventions Development and Evaluation • Resources • Development: http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/ • http://ipdas.ohri.ca/ • Evaluation • http://ipdas.ohri.ca/ • IPDASi: http://www.ipdasi.org/IPDASi%20Information.pdf

  15. Decision Quality Karen Sepucha, PhD

  16. Model of medical care • Inputs / Process / Outputs • Research continuum: Patient decision aids • Development  Evaluation  Implementation • Criteria for appraising survey instruments • Validity and reliability

  17. Resources • OHRI common decision aid measures: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval.html • • NCI-GEM SDM measures and reviews: www.gem- beta.org • • MGH decision quality instruments: http://www.massgeneral.org/decisionsciences/ • • IPDAS chapter on evaluation (BMC) • • CAHPS group (SDM requirement for PCMH and ACOs): http://cahps.ahrq.gov/clinician_group/

  18. Interactive Activities

  19. 2 Exercises • Evaluation of decision • 3 groups—each received a different decision aid • Used IPDAS (checklist) criteria to evaluate the quality of the tool • Evaluation of traditional research project vs. an implementation project in routine care. • Provided handouts that describe one of the two research projects described above. • Asked participants to reflect on • What is the goal of the project • What are the most important outcomes/data to collect • What are approaches/surveys that could assess outcomes • Strengths and weaknesses of different approaches

  20. How Did Learners Like Us?

  21. Our Evaluations • Pretty Well… • Among the best courses I have ever taken: N = 1 • A very good course w/ minor weaknesses: N = 8 • A good course but significant room for improvement: N = 1 • A very weak course: N = 1 • 10 out of 11 would recommend this course to colleagues • Interactive involvement • Too little: N = 1 • Just the right amount: N = 8 • Too much: N = 2

  22. Comments from Evaluations • Too many speakers • Introduction too long • Not enough on heuristics and biases • Didn’t provide handouts • Disagreement on the value of the interactive exercises

  23. Conclusions From Our First Attempt • Our initial attempt was too ambitious • Tried to cover too much in too little time • Needed to make sure people kept to the time limit and that we were more thoughtful about how to focus/split up the content. • It might not be feasible to teach a truly comprehensive SDM curriculum in a short course setting. • Too many subtopics, so little time.

  24. Round 2: Upcoming Course • Will decrease: • Number of speakers from 4 to 3 (but due to maternity leave, only 2 will be there). • Introduction • Decision Quality • Increase • Discussion of heuristics and biases that affect medical decision making • Discussion of how to decrease these biases • Change interactive exercises

  25. Development of Decision Aids Course taught at New York University (2011 Currently)

  26. Process • Lecture & lab in the morning • Lecture & lab in the afternoon • Sharing of decision aid development challenges • Day 1 • Background on models of patient-physician decision making. • What are decision aids? What they have been proven to do, not do? • Day 2 • Literacy • Numeracy / Risk communication

  27. Day 3 • Preference elicitation • Tailoring • Day 4 • Web-based Decision Aids • Implementation • Day 5 • Survey design and evaluation • Presentation of decision aids

  28. One Last Resource Slide • Mary Politi teaches a course of shared decision making and shared this link to her course and syllabus: • http://www.mphs.wustl.edu/Courses/MPHS%20Elective#M19-560http://www.mphs.wustl.edu/Courses/MPHS%20Elective#M19-560 • Paul Han (Risk Communication Module, designed for medical students) • Han et al., Development and evaluation of a risk communication curriculum. Patient Education and Counseling, 2014.

  29. You Can’t Ask Me Questions (NOW) • But you can ask me later (or now, by email) fagerlin@med.umich.edu @angiefagerlin www.cbssm.med.umich.edu

More Related