290 likes | 448 Views
Producing the NICE guidance. 2007 - National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) decides to produce public health guidance on promoting the mental wellbeing of children in primary education Two studies commissioned looking at universal interventions (University of Warwick) and at ta
E N D
1. Mental wellbeing of children in primary education: Evidence from the NICE reviews on the role of families
2. Producing the NICE guidance 2007 - National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) decides to produce public health guidance on promoting the mental wellbeing of children in primary education
Two studies commissioned looking at universal interventions (University of Warwick) and at targeted interventions (University of Teesside
Later addition of work on violence prevention/bullying
3. Whole school/universal approaches encompass school policies, systems and structures to create ethos and environment that promotes mental wellbeing
includes physical environment, links with parents and community, management, development and support of teachers
includes curriculum-based programmes and other activities aimed at developing social and emotional competence of all students
4. Indicated and targeted approaches focus on particular types of behaviour or particular groups of pupils
address the factors likely to lead to poor mental health or mental disorders
may include ways of identifying children at particular risk
5. Levels of need/parent involvement?
6. University of Teesside team
Professor Janet Shucksmith
Professor Carolyn Summerbell
Susan Jones
Vikki Whittaker
7. Aims of the systematic review To identify and synthesise primary research undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of school-based targeted/indicated activities on the mental wellbeing of primary school children (aged 4-11 years) in the developed world.
8. Specific research questions What aspects of targeted/indicated activities effective in promoting mental health of CYP (4–11 years old) in primary schools?
What content most effective?
Frequency, length and duration of an effective intervention?
Better if teachers, school support staff, or specialists (such as psychologists or school nurses) delivers intervention?
Role of governors?
Role of parents?
Barriers to/facilitators of effective implementation?
Any adverse or unintended effects?
9. Inclusion criteria Primary research studies
Must be randomised and controlled
Must focus on behaviours intended to produce outcomes related to improvements in mental wellbeing
Written in English
Published after 1990
Undertaken in developed countries
Focus on primary age children between 4 and 11 years of age
10. Some further defining criteria Must use
a targeted approach (on a group at risk) or
an indicated approach (on a group already identified as having problems)
Broad definition of ‘school involvement’ taken
import of other professional skills into classroom/school settings
development by teachers and school personnel of skills used in mental health improvement interventions.
11. Exclusion criteria Primary studies excluded if did not cover any of the previous criteria and/or covered following exclusion criteria:
interventions that lasted less than one month
interventions that took place entirely in clinic settings out of school or at home
interventions that focused on pharmacological treatment. Re Rob and tracy’s work evidence that strong bonding socila capiatl in disadvantaged communities and that this v necessary for survival, e.g. non monetary exchanges, childcare, loans, favours, but this almost inimical to operation outside this zoneRe Rob and tracy’s work evidence that strong bonding socila capiatl in disadvantaged communities and that this v necessary for survival, e.g. non monetary exchanges, childcare, loans, favours, but this almost inimical to operation outside this zone
12. Classification 32 primary research studies met the criteria for inclusion
Decision made to use ONS classification of mental disorders to group studies, since most of targeted interventions designed to tackle specified mental conditions
ONS groupings equate to DSM-IV and IDC 10 categories
13. Classification
14. Some examples: anxiety disorders Coping Koala (Australia) developed from Kendall’s Coping Cat programme in US
Brief (10 weeks and 9 weeks) targeted interventions with groups of children showing precursor symptoms
15. Some examples: anxiety disorders
Coping Koala - CBT programme that teaches children strategies for coping with anxiety within a group format, using FEAR plan - each child develops and implements his/her own plan of graduated exposure to fear stimuli using physiological, cognitive and behavioural coping strategies
Group processes used to help children learn positive strategies from each other and to reinforce individual efforts and change
Parent training combined with child group CBT produced additional benefits for children over simply treating children
16. Some examples: ADHD Bloomquist et al (1991) - CBT interventions with ADHD children largely ineffective - short-term gains rarely sustained. Lack of success attributed to attention being focused solely on children (with supportive adults being only peripherally involved)
Bloomquist et al’s programme interventions were multi component, targeting children, teachers and parents and also focusing on teaching children problem solving and self-instruction skills.
Neither study reported significant effects
May reflect the co-morbidity of ADHD with other conduct disorders
17. Some examples: ODD and CD Most prevalent disorder
Parent behaviours and conduct disorder
high punitive discipline
lack of monitoring
frequent reprimands
Children with conduct disorders
poorer social skills
high rates cognitive distortion
problem solving deficits
18. Some examples: ODD and CD Early interventions targeted solely at young people
Later development of multicomponent programmes - involve complex mix of activities directed at young people, but also at parents and/or teachers
Incredible Years Intervention developed by Webster-Stratton originally focused on parents and parent training and education
Later intervention trials combined this with teacher training and child skills training - seem to demonstrate longer-term effects
19. Some examples: ODD and CD Clinic - weekly 2-hour sessions over six months
Treatments CBT based - offered by clinicians
Groupwork - use of puppets, live and videotape modelling and role-playing, practice activities and fantasy play. Homework exercises also given
Children in treatment programme showed more prosocial skills than controls
All parent training conditions resulted in more positive parenting.
Adding teacher training to both the parent training and child training regimes improved outcomes
20. Some examples: ODD and CD Fast Track - from PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies) programme
PATHS whole-school programme but this is intensified form of intervention with targeted/‘at risk’ pupils.
9,000+ kindergarten children screened - 891 identified as high risk (living in areas of high crime and poverty plus teacher-parent ratings of disruptive behaviour at home and school, then randomly assigned to intervention/control groups
21. Some examples: ODD and CD
Beginning in Grade 1, high risk children and parents asked to participate in combination of social skills and anger control training, academic tutoring, parent training and home visiting
Universal classroom programme delivered to core schools attended by these high-risk children
Intervention for Fast Track group involved attendance at a 2-hour enrichment programme held at school after school or at weekends once a week
22 sessions a year offered October to April
Provision of childcare and transport included as inducement to attendance. Parents paid $15 for each session attended
22. Some examples: ODD and CD At enrichment session children attend ‘friendship group’ where they learn/rehearse social skills using role modelling, discussions, stories and films
During same hour parents meet in group led by family co-ordinators to discuss parenting strategies that would improve child behaviour
After this, parent-child pairs spend 30 minutes together each session, participating in positive co-operation activities and practising positive parenting skills with staff support
During last 30 minutes children work with paraprofessional support staff on reading skills while parents observe
23. Some examples: ODD and CD Overall conclusion at grades 4 and 5 follow up? Fast Track influenced key areas of children’s’ adjustment throughout elementary school, children less likely to emerge as ‘cases’. Treated children less likely to be involved in deviant peer groups
Hypothesis that Fast Track would improve academic and behavioural performance at school not met
Project continues to track children through transition into high school
Fast Track clearly ‘work in progress’, but intensive and costly and gains appear modest
Extent to which results are diluted by the proportion of ‘false positives’ - children identified as ‘at risk’ in kindergarten on the basis of teacher and parent ratings, but who by grade 1 show no signs of serious behaviour problems?
24. Some examples: ODD and CD Early Risers - developed by August in US - aims to alter developmental trajectory of children with early onset aggressive behaviour
Multicomponent intervention - features summer school programme, teacher consultation, student mentoring programme, parent skills training groups and child social skills groups
Subjects recruited via screening programme based mainly on teacher rating carried out across ten matched kindergarten schools in semi rural area of Minnesota
25. Some examples: ODD and CD Children received main intervention at intensive 6-week summer school held at 4 elementary schools in the region
Social skills training coupled with creative arts/sports training and recreational activities
During rest of year Early Risers family advocates served as consultants to schools, making weekly visits to review student progress and give advice regarding potential interventions that might be useful for individual students
Results at end of intervention? Gains for intervention children on academic achievement score compared to controls, but no significant differences on behavioural self-regulation, social competence or parent involvement
26. Some examples: ODD and CD Further analyses - effectiveness of intervention limited to certain subgroups on basis of behavioural severity and amount of attention received (intervention dosage).
After further year’s intervention authors report significantly more success. programme After 3 years of intervention, intervention children showed greater gains in social skills, academic achievement and parent discipline
Parents and teachers rated programme children as having more positive social skills than control children. Difference in social skills (not been evident at two year level) attests, in authors’ opinion, to need for continuous intervention efforts or booster supplements when targeting at-risk children
No programme versus control differences observed in children’s aggression, hyperactivity and impulsivity
27. Key findings: ODD and CD Multicomponent programmes: given intensive and lengthy nature of interventions, gains appear modest at intervention and follow up.
Social problem solving and development of positive peer relations among outcomes with the strongest programme effects.
Improved academic achievement as significant outcome of intervention (2 studies both 1++)
Timing critical. Case for early intervention with aggressive disruptive children but improved benefits by giving booster intervention towards the end of primary education (1 study 1++)
28. Key findings: ODD and CD No magic bullets
Parent involvement critical to success
Interventions may need to be continuous and repeated
Recruitment into parent programmes - major challenge. Given a choice, evidence from 1 study (quality rating 1++) indicates parents prefer targeted children to be treated at school rather than at home
29. Info gaps and caveats
No UK studies – mostly US, some Australia
Noticeable shifts in quality across period here - early proliferation of small-scale studies (mostly focused on YP alone)
‘Long game’ of programme interventions - evidence lacking - fundamental aspect of programmes is ‘start early’ and wait for ‘sleeper’ effects
Generalisability to the UK – may be high
Few studies for targeted groups using school staff
30. Overall conclusion Current evidence inconclusive
Results from multicomponent longitudinal programmes over next few years will be more revealing
Real life interventions using school personnel raise new questions about school effects
Level of resource involved in working with YP, parents and teachers is very large. Beneficial effect would have to be shown to be very large across multiple domains