140 likes | 261 Views
Presentation to the State Board of Education Thursday, April 10, 2014. MNPS Budget Growth. Average Annual Growth = 3.8% . $779.0 million*. Millions. $622.8 million. * Projected for planning purposes. Enrollment Growth. 84,543 students. 84,543 students*. Average Annual Growth = 2.0% .
E N D
Presentation to the State Board of Education Thursday, April 10, 2014
MNPS BudgetGrowth Average Annual Growth = 3.8% $779.0 million* Millions $622.8 million * Projected for planning purposes
Enrollment Growth 84,543 students 84,543 students* Average Annual Growth = 2.0% 75,029 students * Projected for planning purposes
Budget Growth by Category: FY09-10 to FY14-15* $78.7 million (49%) $81.0 million (51%) * Projected for planning purposes
Employee Compensation Growth: FY09-10 to FY14-15* $78.7 million (49%) * Projected for planning purposes
Required Additions Growth: FY09-10 to FY14-15* $81.0 million (51%) * Projected for planning purposes
Charter School Cash Outlays Average Annual Growth = 54.3% $53.0 million* Millions $4.6 million * Projected for planning purposes
Analysis: FY14-15 Operating Budget Potential Shortfall = $17.6 million Millions Charter growth Employee Compensation Other Required Additions * Assumes 2% revenue growth, for planning purposes
High-Leverage Options • Consolidating/closing under-utilized buildings • Raising class sizes in middle and high schools • Reducing the certificated workforce • Eliminating enhanced-options schools
Fiscally & Operationally Sustainable Growth • In November, the Metro Nashville Board of Public Education passed RS2013-4 “establishing priorities for deploying charter schools” during 2014 • Strategic priorities include: • Conversion of existing low-performing schools • New charters in exceedingly overcrowded cluster tiers FACT: The Glencliff and Overton elementary tiers are on track to hit 121%and 125% capacity, respectively, during the fall 2017-18 school year.
Common-Sense Approach • MNPS charter review process utilizes three “lenses” • Quality. Applications must meet NACSA quality standards. • Strategic priorities. Applications should address the school district’s stated needs. • Fiscal impact. Pursuant to TCA 49-13-108(b), applications should not be "contrary to the best interests of the pupils, school district or community.”