1 / 44

The Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope

The Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope. The USA Decadal Review. In May 2000, the US astronomy decadal review committee recommended, as its highest priority ground-based initiative, the construction of a 30-meter Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope (GSMT)

odysseus
Download Presentation

The Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope

  2. The USA Decadal Review • In May 2000, the US astronomy decadal review committee recommended, as its highest priority ground-based initiative, the construction of a 30-meter Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope (GSMT) • In response, AURA formed a New Initiatives Office (NIO) to support scientific and technical studies leading to the creation of a GSMT • NIO is a joint venture of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) and the Gemini Observatory • Goal is to ensure broad astronomy community access to a 30m telescope contemporary with NGST.

  3. N IO Organization NIO Management Board William Smith -- President of AURA Jeremy Mould -- Director of NOAO Matt Mountain -- Director of Gemini Observatory Project Scientist Steve Strom Program Manager Larry Stepp System Scientist Brooke Gregory Admin. Assistant Jennifer Purcell Opto-Mechanical Myung Cho Controls George Angeli Adaptive Optics Ellerbroek - Gemini Instruments Barden - NOAO Mechanical Designer Rick Robles Structures Paul Gillett Optics Hansen - Gemini Sites Walker - NOAO

  4. AURA New Initiatives OfficeApproach to GSMT Design Three Parallel efforts: • Understand the scientific context for GSMT in NGST / ALMA era • Develop the key science requirements • Address challenges common to all ELTs • Site testing and selection • Cost-effective segment fabrication • Characterization of wind loading • Hierarchical control systems • Adaptive optics • Cost control techniques • Develop a Point Design • Based on initial science goals & instrument concepts

  5. Science Programs

  6. Site Testing and Selection • Survey of candidate sites by remote sensing (satellite data) • Regions of interest: • Mauna Kea • Western United States and Mexico • Chile • Parameters determined: • Cloud cover • Precipitable water vapor • Collaborators: • Cornell • ESO • University of Tokyo • CELT • UNAM & INAOE (Mexico)

  7. Site Testing and Selection • Construction of turbulence profilometer (MASS – Multi-Aperture Scintillation Sensor) • Uses scintillation measurements of a single star to measure: • Isoplanatic angle, characteristic strengths and altitudes of the few dominant turbulence layers • Integral seeing producing by the whole atmosphere

  8. Site Testing and Selection • Atmospheric turbulence modeling and measuring • Direct measurements of seeing and wind speed • Computational fluid dynamics • Collaborators • CELT • UNAM (Mexico) • Cornell Digital elevation model of Chajnantor region

  9. Site Testing and Selection • Sodium layer measurements at Cerro Tololo • Collaborating on Gemini study to answer questions about variation of sodium layer height, thickness and column density with: • Latitude • Season • Time of night 300mw laser launched from laser room on Cerro Tololo

  10. Characterization of Wind LoadingTest at Gemini South • Opportunity arose during integration of Gemini South to do a full-scale wind test in realistic conditions • Gemini enclosure has large vent gates – permits testing a range of enclosure conditions • Gemini dummy mirror has equivalent properties as the real primary mirror, but can be instrumented • Gemini M1 is above the EL axis - open to the wind flow (similar to concepts for future larger telescopes)

  11. Gemini 8-meter Telescope

  12. Sensor locations 3-axis anemometers Pressure sensors, 32 places

  13. Ultrasonic anemometer Ultrasonic anemometer Pressure sensors Sensor Locations

  14. Simultaneous Animations(c00030oo) Wind Pressure (N/m2) Mirror Deformation (microns) Wind Speed at 5 Locations (m/sec)

  15. Controls Approach: Hierarchical Subsystems ~100 ~50 ~20 ~10 2 LGS MCAO spatial & temporal avg Zernike modes AO (M2) spatial & temporal avg aO (M1) spatial avg temporal avg spatial avg Secondary rigid body spatial & temporal avg Main Axes 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Bandwidth [Hz]

  16. Point DesignKey Features • Fast aspheric primary • Stigmatic image after two reflections • Radio telescope-type design • Structural advantages • Accommodates large instruments • Adaptive secondary • Wind-buffeting compensation • Atmospheric correction in IR, with low emissivity • First stage in higher-order adaptive systems • Prime focus instrument • Convenient plate scale for seeing-limited observations • Enables wide-field science

  17. Optical Design Optical design: Classical Cassegrain M1 diameter: 30 meters M1 focal ratio: f/1 M2 diameter: 2 meters M2 focal ratio: f/18.75

  18. Radio Telescope Structural Design • Lightweight steel truss structure • Fast primary focal ratio • Small secondary mirror • M2 supported on tripod structure • Elevation axis behind M1 • Span between elevation bearings is less than M1 diameter • Allows direct load path

  19. Initial Point Design Structure Concept developed by Joe Antebi of Simpson Gumpertz & Heger • Based on radio telescope • Space frame truss • Single counterweight • Cross bracing of M2 support

  20. Initial Point Design Structure Plan View of StructurePattern of segments Gemini

  21. Initial Structural Analysis Horizon Pointing - Mode 1 = 2.16 Hz

  22. A Few Parameters from the Structural Analysis • Total weight of elevation structure – 700 tonnes • Total moving weight – 1400 tonnes • Gravity deflections ~ 5-25 mm • Primarily rigid-body tilt of elevation structure • Lowest resonant frequencies ~ 2 Hz Large size and low resonant frequency make wind buffeting a key issue.

  23. Current structural concept

  24. Primary Mirror Segments • Segment dimensions • 1.15-m across flats -- 1.33-m corner to corner • 50 mm thickness • Number of segments: 618 • Maximum departure from sphere 110 microns • Comparable to Keck • Axial support is 18-point whiffletree • FEA Gravity deflection 15 nm RMS

  25. One-piece Central Raft

  26. Stray Light BafflesIf Needed Primary baffle: 14 m long Secondary baffle: 3 m diamater Fully baffled field of view: 5 arc min

  27. Controllable Elements Active Systems: • M2 rigid body motion • ~ 5-10 Hz • Five axes • M1 segment rigid body position • ~ 1 Hz • Piston, tip & tilt • M1 segment figure control • Based on look-up table ~ 0.1 Hz • Astigmatism, focus, trefoil, coma • Active structural elements • Active alignment • Active damping

  28. Controllable Elements Adaptive Systems: • Adaptive mirror in prime focus corrector • Adaptive secondary mirror • ~ 20-50 Hz • ~ 2400 actuators • Multi-conjugate wide-field AO • ~ 3 DMs; ~ 8500 actuators • Laser Guide Stars • High-order narrow-field conventional AO • ~ 10,000 – 50,000 actuators

  29. Active and Adaptive Optics will be integrated into Telescope and Instrument concepts from the start.

  30. Instruments • NIO currently developing design concepts for 5 instruments: • Multi-Object, Multi-Fiber, Optical Spectrograph – MOMFOS • Near IR Deployable Integral Field Spectrograph – NIRDIF • MCAO-fed near-IR imager • Mid-IR, High Dispersion, AO Spectrograph – MIHDAS • Diffraction-Limited Near IR Coronagraph

  31. Multi-Object Multi-Fiber Optical Spectrograph(MOMFOS) Located at prime focus

  32. Multi-Object Multi-Fiber Optical Spectrograph(MOMFOS) Located at prime focus

  33. Diffraction-limited Coronagraph Located at co-moving Cassegrain focus

  34. Instrument LocationsPrime Focus

  35. Instrument LocationsCo-moving Cassegrain Focus

  36. Instrument LocationsFixed-gravity Cassegrain Focus

  37. Instrument LocationsMCAO-fed Nasmyth Focus

  38. MCAO System

  39. Mayall, Gemini and GSMT Enclosuresat same scale Mayall GSMT Gemini

  40. McKale Center – Univ of Arizona

  41. GSMT – at same scale

  42. Some Possible GSMT Enclosure Designs

  43. Plans for the Next 10 Months • Complete “GSMT Book” in electronic form – will be available next month at: www.aura-nio.noao.edu • Involve community in understanding GSMT scientific context • Continue work on point design • Develop integrated modeling of telescope response to disturbances (mainly wind) • Continue site testing efforts • Develop cost estimates & cost-reduction strategies

  44. Plans for the Next 10 Months • Develop collaborations to work on: • Site testing • Segment fabrication methods • Characterization of wind loading • Adaptive optics • Development of cost estimates and estimating methods • Build partnership to proceed with GSMT design

More Related