180 likes | 318 Views
The Importance of Agriculture to Fayette County. Alison Davis Reum Department of Agriculture Economics University of Kentucky. Agriculture in Fayette County . 738 farms, down 11% from 1997 119,098 acres of farmland, down 14% 161 average acres per farm, down 4%
E N D
The Importance of Agriculture to Fayette County Alison Davis Reum Department of Agriculture Economics University of Kentucky
Agriculture in Fayette County • 738 farms, down 11% from 1997 • 119,098 acres of farmland, down 14% • 161 average acres per farm, down 4% • Market value per farm: $242,401, up 42% • $3,492 average government payments, up 89%
Equine Industry • The equine industry itself represents a significant part of the regional economy • 53.4% of total agricultural production in Fayette County is related to the horse industry • In Fayette County, the production of horses, including stud fees, represents 1% of the total output. • This may seem low because it does not include veterinary services, food and retail services, and other aspects of tourism.
What is the economic importance of agriculture? • We are going to look beyond simple output or market value and look at the direct, indirect, and induced effects from producing agricultural commodities in Fayette County.
The theory of multipliers • Multipliers measure total change throughout the economy from a one unit change for a given sector. • Three types of multipliers • Output – Revenue • Employment • Income
Type II multiplier • Includes direct or initial spending • Includes indirect spending or businesses buying and selling to each other • It also includes household spending based on the income earned from the direct and indirect effects – the induced effects. These are the employees spending on goods and services
Multipliers applied to agriculture in Fayette County and Kentucky
An interpretation of the multipliers • Employment Multiplier 1.51 • For every $1 Million spent for agricultural production, a total of 32.46 new jobs are created. This includes 21.55 jobs from the direct effects, 6.5 jobs from the indirect effects, and 4.41 from the induced effects. • Income multiplier: 2.14 • When the agriculture sector realizes a $1 change in income, total income in the study area changes by $2.14 from direct and indirect linkages
Multipliers applied to the equine industry in Fayette County and Kentucky
An interpretation of the multipliers • Employment Multiplier 1.21 • For every $1 Million spent for agricultural production, a total of 27.7 new jobs are created. This includes 22.9 jobs from the direct effects, 3.2 jobs from the indirect effects, and 1.6 from the induced effects. • Income multiplier: 2.26 • When the agriculture sector realizes a $1 change in income, total income in the study area changes by $2.26 from direct and indirect linkages
Consequences of Developing Land • Proposal is to develop 7,000 acres of land in Fayette County • Assuming each of those acres is dedicated to horse-related agriculture, $10.7 Million dollars would be the direct loss and $14.8 million would include all direct, indirect and induced effects associated with the loss of land.
Employment and Income Consequences • 297 workers would be laid off • There would be a $2.6 Million reduction in income
What if all of the 7,000 acres were committed to residential development? • Employment multiplier: 2.00 • Income multiplier: 1.91 • Employment multiplier is higher for residential development but the income multiplier is slightly higher for the horse industry.
Other equine related activities to consider • Veterinary Services: $80 Million • Spectator Sports: $67 Million • Food Services & Drinking Places: $753 Million • Hotels and Motels: $91 Million • Gambling: $38 Million
Conclusion • There would be a significant negative impact on the equine industry if 7,000 acres are developed. • It is unclear, in economic terms, if the benefits from development, i.e. new jobs and income gain would outpace these same types of losses from agriculture • Other issues must considered: the infrastructure surrounding the land and the alternative uses of the land.