1 / 21

General Indicators

General Indicators. 1. Indicators Foundation. Regional Indicators Initiative. HUD Flagship Indicators. Model Indicators. General Indicators. Reporting the Results. Indicators Timeline. Creation of master indicators list (General and Model) (Spring 2012)

olive
Download Presentation

General Indicators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. General Indicators 1

  2. Indicators Foundation Regional Indicators Initiative HUD Flagship Indicators Model Indicators General Indicators Reporting the Results

  3. Indicators Timeline • Creation of master indicators list (General and Model) (Spring 2012) • Separation of General (UI) and Model (MN) Indicators (Summer 2012) • HUD Flagship Sustainability indicators (Oct-Dec 2012) • Public Engagement initiative (Nov 2012-March 2013) • Work Group meetings (Jan-May 2013) • Final selection of General Indicators (May-June 2013) • UNC Charlotte Urban Institute Regional Indicators Data Partner Website (Summer/Fall 2013)

  4. Where do General Indicators come from? • Public Engagement Initiative • Open Houses, Focus Groups, CONNECT website submissions • 2,215 total respondents • Indicators to align with and reflect public and community values • CONNECT Work Groups • Blueprinting, Public Engagement/Inclusivity, Economic Development, Housing, Air Quality/Climate Change, Energy, Food Access/Logistics, Public Health, Consortium Relations • CONNECT Consortium • HUD Flagship Sustainability Indicators • 8 total, 5 recommended as General Indicators (denoted by *)

  5. Sampling of Public Engagement Themes • The best of your community: • -Downtowns • -Parks • -Natural assets • -Neighborhoods • -Community assets Biggest challenge for our region: -Jobs; economic development; poverty; unemployment -Transportation; traffic; walkability -Infrastructure to support growth -Managing growth; sustainable development -Schools; education; skills development Community’s future transportation needs: -More sidewalks, trails, other safe places to walk -Improved roads -Better connected streets that provide a choice of routes -More bike lanes, paths, other safe places to bike -New/more rail transit

  6. Evaluating General Indicators • Source • Historically available • Coverage area – 14 counties • Representative of CONNECT Core Values and Work Group focus areas

  7. Core Value 1: Sustainable, Well-Managed Growth General Indicators Model Indicators • Total % of workforce commuting via rideshare, biking, transit, walking, commute alone, work at home* • % population with commute time under 30 minutes (also 30 to 59 minutes, over 60 minutes) • Number of LEED-certified buildings in CONNECT area (certified, silver, gold, platinum) • Population, density • Avg. residential density, prevailing lot size • SF/MF housing mix • Non-residential square footage by category, FAR • Development context • Land use mix • Urban footprint • Development in existing utility service areas • Water, sewer- plant demand, CTS • Electric, natural gas service, avg. demand • Parkland- demand, proximity, CTS • Transportation- travel time, transit ridership, coverage, auto vs. non-auto trips, CTS

  8. Core Value 1: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Annual delay hours / traveler- models • Traffic safety (accidents, fatalities, pedestrians in traffic accidents, bicyclists in traffic accidents)- relevancy • Electricity sales (kwh) per residential customer in CONNECT area- CV model • Traffic-models • Walkability – 5D model • Managing growth- models, public engagement • Infrastructure to support growth-CV model

  9. Core Value 2: Strong, Diverse Economy General Indicators Model Indicators • % unemployment by geography • Median household income • Per capita income • Annual employment growth/change (all industries) • Payroll growth • % change in number of business establishments • Gross regional product (GRP) • % employment by industry • Employees • Employee density • Jobs-housing balance

  10. Core Value 2: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Exports- source • Manufacturing output per worker (productivity index)- source

  11. Core Value 3: Safe and Healthy Environment Model Indicators General Indicators • % of days with unhealthy air quality (unhealthy for sensitive groups and above) • Ground-level ozone (design value) • Particulate matter emissions (PM2.5 design value) • Agricultural/farm land (acres/person, average size) • Number of Farmers Markets/1,000 population • Prevalence of key diseases (diabetes, heart disease, cancer) by county, ethnicity, income • Agriculture land consumed • Protected open space • Air quality, avg. daily CO2/NOx auto emissions • Water quality • Impervious surface • Access to healthcare providers

  12. Core Value 3: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Teen birth rate- relevancy • Substantiated child abuse and neglect reports- relevancy • Childhood obesity- relevancy • Children born to women who smoked while pregnant- relevancy • Mental health (suicides, severe emotional disturbance)- relevancy • # of infant deaths per 1,000 live births (Infant mortality rate)- relevancy • Deaths per 100,000 population (total mortality rate) (also for cancer, heart disease, and suicide)- relevancy • STD cases per 100,000 population (chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV/AIDS)- relevancy • Superfund sites- relevancy • Hazardous waste management sites- relevancy • Brownfield, clean-up- relevancy • Toxic release inventory- relevancy • Number of food hubs- 2012 only • Direct Farm Sales- 2007 only • Water quality- CV model

  13. Core Value 4: Increased Collaboration Among Jurisdictions General Indicators Model Indicators • General local government debt to revenue ratio* • Voter registration • Voter turnout • Consistency with local plans • Consistency with regional plans

  14. Core Value 4: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Accessibility of all persons to input into public processes and decisions-source • Number and types of projects/initiatives that result from regional collaboration- source • Number of times elected leaders come together to support a specific policy approach, grant application, etc.- source • Number of times CCOG/CRCOG Boards or Executive Boards meet together-source

  15. Core Value 5: High-Quality Education Opportunities Model Indicators General Indicators • Public school enrollment • Public schools CTS • % population with bachelors degree (also less than high school, high school, some college, associates degree, graduate or professional degree) • 4 year cohort graduation rate by district • At or above grade level in reading, math, composite, grades 3-8 • Average SAT score by district

  16. Core Value 5: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Public school enrollment-CV model

  17. Core Value 6: Enhanced Social Equity General Indicators Model Indicators • % of income spent on transportation • % of population with health insurance • % families, individuals, children in poverty • % affordable housing • Proportion of household income spent on housing and transportation costs* • % owner, renter units affordable to households earning 80% of HUD area median family income* • % total pop reside in low income census tract and reside more than 1 mi. from supermarket/large grocery store (distance >10 mi in rural areas)* • Crime index (total, property, violent) • Households w/ food insecurity

  18. Core Value 6: Made final General Indicators list, not recommended • Segregation and community disparity indices- not useful at county-level • At or above grade level in reading, math, composite, grades 3-8 by race/ethnicity, gender- relevancy

  19. Next steps • Final Blueprinting approval of General Indicators- 5/23 • Final Consortium approval of General Indicators- June 2013 • Questions for Blueprinting before 5/23: • Given the explanations, are there any indicators that were not recommended you feel are necessary to CONNECT? • Is there anything you don’t see? Anything you are concerned by?

More Related