110 likes | 200 Views
Katarína Magulová, Katarína Marečková Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute. National Emission Inventory System of Slovakia. REZZO - stationary sources SO2, NOx, CO, TZP R1 LPS > 5MW (about 1000 sources) subcategories: Energy, Industry - annual update
E N D
Katarína Magulová, Katarína Marečková Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute National Emission Inventory System of Slovakia
REZZO - stationary sources SO2, NOx, CO, TZP R1 LPS > 5MW (about 1000 sources) subcategories: Energy,Industry - annual update R2 0.2-5MW (about 9000 sources) – 4 years cycle Questioners collected by SHMU R3 <0.2 MW (fuel sold)Information annually collected by SHMU Other categories/ pollutants Transport – external contribution - yearly contract – COPERT II Agriculture - external - IPCC categories -since 1990 annually HM – SNAP, 1990, 1992, 1994-99 NMVOC – VOC protocol categories/ SNAP categories – 1990, 1993, 1995-99 POPs - SNAP 1990, 1995, 1997-99 GHGs – IPCC categories - since 1990 annually Originalstructure of the system
data annually updated by questionnaires combustion process - emissions calculated using EF emissions from technologies according to the findings of sources emissions from transport COPERT Since 1993 sources are obliged to report yearly emission data to district offices (DO) Methodologies used for emission estimation • Since 1987 SHMÚ operates REZZO • DO are competent to decide on amount of emissions • emission measurement/calculation according to Gov. Regulation • mostly manual data processing • regional databases are not integrated
Duplicated data collection Inconsistency of data at local and national level Inconsistency in source categorisation Inconsistency of data processing on the level of different DO Outdated data processing on the level of DO Disadvantages of the original system
Accession/Adaptation steps • Creation of a new BAT-based legislation • Emission standards, categorisation of air pollution sources, list of polluting substances, fees for air pollution, emission measurement/calculation • Development of Programs for Fulfilment of International commitments • Reporting to: UN ECE CLRTAP, Montreal Protocol, UN FCCC,…. • Steps towards EU accession • Identification of gaps, Transposition of EU legislation (IPPC, LCP , WI, VOC, GHG monitoring mechanism, EPER... ) • Need for transformation of the emission inventory system
NEIS: Development of the System Collaboration with all subjects involved-MoE,MoIA,RO,DO,SEPA during the whole project period • Preparatory phase -design of the system • Realisation phase - creation of particular applications • Pilot testing -in at least one district in each of the eight regions • Terminal phase - optimisation and finishing of the system • Implementation phase -implementation of the system in the DO, at air pollution sources and at SHMU
Identification data of point sources -operator, address, categorisation (NACE, SNAP, SK-law) Technical/technological data- source composition, combustion equipment technological equipment Stacks and gas escape localities Abatement techniques/efficiency Combustion sources- total emitted quantities, calculation conditions, emission factors, emission measurement results Technological sources- total emitted quantities, calculation conditions, emission factors, emission measurement results Fuels and other fired substances average composition data and parameters, quantities consumed Data contained in NEIS
Unified air pollution source data collection and processing all over the territory of Slovakia Data verification possibility due to the incorporated supporting data files and calculation formulas Transparent and coherent emission data for national air quality assessment/management Compliance with the national legislation Complex multi-level system consisting of modules for the level of a particular plant, municipality, district, region and whole Slovakia Interconnection of NEIS with the international emission inventory system CORINAIR Advantages of the new system General preparedness for GHGMM and EPER (only air pollution)
Need for further steps (1) • Adapt the NEIS system for automated EPER reporting • Identifying EPER-relevant installations within the NEIS • link NEIS activity codes (NACE codes) with the IPPC source categories • develop procedure to ensure non-biased reporting and checking by operators and district offices • formalise the process of preparing emission factors • setting up a organisational structure and procedure for inclusion of water pollutants • rules for consistency checking on the national level
Need for further steps (2) • GHG reporting • developing a QA/QC system for supplementing NEIS data • further application of the IPPC Good Practice Guidance • ensuring consistency between the national energy statistics with fuel data obtained through NEIS • address uncertainty management • link reporting requirement and responsible organisations ?? • establish system for documenting and archiving as required by Kyoto protocol