1 / 16

RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. I.Syratchev, CERN

MDK Workshop, CERN, Geneva, April 2001. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. I.Syratchev, CERN. MDK-2001. CERN Switzerland.  RF Pulse Compression is the only way to increase RF power level from the number of klystrons available for CTF#3.

oneala
Download Presentation

RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. I.Syratchev, CERN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MDK Workshop, CERN, Geneva, April 2001 RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. I.Syratchev, CERN MDK-2001 CERN Switzerland

  2.  RF Pulse Compression is the only way to increase RF power level from the number of klystrons available for CTF#3.  RF phase/amplitude modulation is the tool to control the RF pulse shape in a system - klystron plus “SLED”-like RF pulse compressor.

  3. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. Output phase  Input phase The flat pulse after the cavity based pulse compressor (LIPS), with modulation of the input RF phase (PM). The linear part of the phase slop will be compensated with the frequency shift: Tout =  LIPS cavity Q0 =1.8x105, =8 2.3 2.1 6.5 sec RF phase, degree 5.5 sec Power gain Time, ns Time, ns

  4. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. The effect of residual RF phase sage and energy spread. R. Corsini Energy spread The residual phase envelops after two RF stations 1=60 2=80 1=80 2=60 1 minimized 2 Single bunches profiles after re-combination. No energy spread

  5. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. LIPS LIPS+PTA Time 2 2 1 1 The flat pulse after the cavity based pulse compressor (LIPS), with modulation of the input RF phase-to-amplitude (PTA). Amplitude Comparison between PTA and PM Cons:  Less efficient (~10%).  Two klystrons needed. Pros:  Output pulse flat both in RF amplitude and phase.  Easy RF power level control.  Better stability of operation.

  6. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. PM Modified LIPS PTA Power gain LIPS Klystron pulse, sec Power gain. # LIPS modification is mainly the adjusting of the cavity coupling.

  7. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. a) RF Phase modulation. Klystron RF phase ripples 30 peak-to-peak. Power Time b) RF Phase-to-amplitude modulation. Klystron RF phase ripples 100 peak-to-peak. 1 Power Time System operation stability. The examples of the compressed RF pulse distortion due to the klystron RF phase ripples. Because of the energy spread, the demand on the compressed pulse flatness : P/P < 2% The main sources of instability: Klystron RF phase and amplitude jitter as result of HV supply instability. PM P/P, % PTA Klystron’s RF phase amplitude of ripples, degree.

  8. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. The identity of the LIPS cavities resonant frequencies. F=-10 kHz -3 kHz Power -1 kHz 2 3 3 Time, ns System operation stability. The frequency deviation of the storage cavity, mainly because of the temperature variation. 2 P/P, % F, kHz To keep the flatness of the compressed pulse within specified P/P, the temperature stabilization of the cavity must be < ± 0.04 0C.

  9. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. System operation stability. Algorithm of the fast correction of the cavity frequency shift. Standard “SLED” Pulse RF phase modulation Flat pulse Distorted pulse -10 kHz Re-adjustment of the RF phase modulation in a fast local feedback system of the klystron. Old New Temperature control system. RF phase modulation Flat pulse

  10. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. Klystron output RF phase Klystron drive phase Klystron 100 Initial RF phase RF power LIPS 1.92 RF phase ripples correction Time, ns ~100 RF phase Time 1sec Experiments with high RF power level. R. Bossart, December 2000. Parameters: Q unloaded 1.6x105 Coupling 8.0 Tin 5 sec Tout 1.4 sec P out/in 34.7/18 MW P gain/teor. 1.92/2.04 P/P< 1%

  11. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. Barrel Open Cavity pulse compressor. 3 GHz version. WHY? 1. We need at least four more RF pulse compressors. 2. The BOC has one cavity, operating in a travelling wave regime - solves the problem of the cavity’s pair identity. 3. Easy to manufacture than LIPS. We can do it in CERN. 4. The test prototype is preparing for the high RF power test.

  12. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3.  =  The eigen-frequency of the Barrel cavity with Emnq oscillation is the solution of the next equation: mn is a root of the Bessel function that for the big m can be approximated as: The optimal radius r0, when the external caustic has the smallest height comes from: where  and  are derived from: Finally the height of the external caustic and Q-factor of the cavity are: The Barrel-cavity theory. z  =  r0 d -d 2h r 2a Cavity profile

  13. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. The shape of the 3.0 GHz Barrel-cavity. R150 R100(L) any R50(R2) Q=1.9780*105 F=2.99855 GHz R125.113* R228(R1) 241.116* 197.75* 11.627(a) 60.150() R239.627

  14. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. The modes of the 3.0 GHz Barrel-cavity. H11,1,2 E10,1,1 H9,1,4 E8,1,3 H7,1,6 2.918 GHz 2.922 GHz 3.0134 GHz 3.000 GHz 2.907 GHz E5,2,3 E7,2,1 E6,1,5 3.081 GHz 3.0215 GHz 3.097 GHz

  15. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. General view and technical sketch of the 3.0 GHz BOC RF pulse compressor.

  16. RF Pulse Compression system for CTF3. Discussion... Questions ?...

More Related