1 / 12

The Global Impact of London Punishments

The Global Impact of London Punishments. Jeremy Bentham PANOPTICON Versus NEW SOUTH WALES OR , THE PANOPTICON PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, AND THE PENAL COLONIZATION SYSTEM, COMPARED 1802 My Dear Lord Pelham, . Penal Transportation. Imprisonment. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867. 6,177.

oona
Download Presentation

The Global Impact of London Punishments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Global Impact of London Punishments

  2. Jeremy Bentham PANOPTICON Versus NEW SOUTH WALES OR, THE PANOPTICON PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, AND THE PENAL COLONIZATION SYSTEM, COMPARED 1802 My Dear Lord Pelham, Penal Transportation Imprisonment

  3. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • DEATH • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • NOT GUILTY • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  4. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  5. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  6. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  7. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  8. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  9. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  10. Old Bailey Jan 1786 – Dec 1867 6,177 Servitude Factory/Barracks/Gangs Assignment/Probation Reoffending/Secondary punishment • NOT GUILTY • DEATH • TRANSPORTATION • CORPORAL / FINES • Hulk • Voyage c.23,300 • NSW c.11,500, VDL c.10,500 • WA c.1000 • Freedom • IMPRISONMENT 143,809 defendants 31,739 42,927 17,374 38,592

  11. Bob Shoemaker Sheffield Tim Hitchcock Sussex Barry Godfrey Liverpool Hamish Maxwell Stewart UTAS Deb Oxley Oxford How to improve data linkage? How can visualisations assist analysis? What epistemological constructions were shaping criminal justice records? How did defendants speak to authority; in what voice, what idiom? Where punishment systems effective? What were the long and short-term consequences of different modes of punishment? What were the intergenerational consequences? What else can these individuals tell us about the lives of non-elites in industrialising Britain?

  12. IMPACT Build capacity (7 PhDs and 3 RAs) Website and social media Resources for schools and universities Prison education programmes Media Academic research

More Related