1 / 19

University of Kassel Chair of Project Management COST Meeting 6-7 th February 2012 Athens

New stretch of track Nuremberg - Ingolstadt. University of Kassel Chair of Project Management COST Meeting 6-7 th February 2012 Athens. TEN Trans European Highspeed Net. Project facts. Project targets NBS/ABS Nuremberg - Ingolstadt – Munich

opa
Download Presentation

University of Kassel Chair of Project Management COST Meeting 6-7 th February 2012 Athens

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New stretch of track Nuremberg - Ingolstadt University of KasselChair of Project ManagementCOST Meeting 6-7th February 2012 Athens University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06

  2. TEN Trans European Highspeed Net University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06

  3. Project facts • Project targets • NBS/ABS Nuremberg - Ingolstadt – Munich • as a part of n-s axis of TEN-HS-Net • - increase of capacity • decrease of travel time about 40 min • decrease of effective length (28 km = 14%) • Project definition • total length: 171 km / total costs: 3.551 mio. € • NBS Nuremberg- Ingolstadt • Total length 89 km • Max speed 300 km/h • max. gradient 2,0 % • Track system slab track (concrete) • Tunnels 9 ( total length 27 km) • Railway Bridges 58 • Road Bridges 24 • Stations 3 • Control system 2 Sub centrals +3 ECC • Train control Continuous automatic train line control NBS University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 ABS

  4. Particularities: Organisation FTIP Long term planning priority Federal Ministry of Transport Principal Project requirements Project targets financing DB AG DB Netz AG DB S + S, DB Energie Federal government Federal parliament Constructor (Agent) Turn key contractor Management, design, construction, (tendering, financing) S t a k e h o l d e r (Policy, authorities, citizens, NGO) DB ProjektBau University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 General Consultant General Contractor Experts Design Construction Con. 1 Con. 2 Con. 3

  5. MEGAPROJECT Project Key Events and Activities Timeline TIME 1994 1985 1983 1986 1988 1991 1992 1993 1996 Speculative application from the federal railway department Nuremberg to the DB headquarters Examination of different route variants ( 2 of 8 variants were chosen) Preparation of the outline design and the planning approval documents Initiation of the plan approval procedure the north section Finance agreement between the FRG and the DB AG Beginning of the regional planning procedure Start of the plan approval procedure Passage of the ‘BVWP 85’ and acquisition for the NBS / ABS Nuremberg-Ingolstadt First planning permission Public notice of the project documents in involved communities Early ground-breaking ceremony in Nuremberg-Altenfurt TIME 1997 1998 1999 2000 … 2005 2006 University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 Finance agreement between the Free State of Bavaria and the DB AG Beginning of the construction work at the ABS The ‘Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.V.’ take legal action against the project Implementing the city railway track in Munich-Petershausen Awarding the contract sections north, middle and south to general contractors Implementing of the NBS Nuremberg-Ingolstadt at the 13 of May 2006 Extensive beginning of construction work at the NBS Last planning permission SECTION 6 - PROJECT TIMELINE

  6. Particularities: Financing University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06

  7. MEGAPROJECT Stakeholder Identification (Internal) University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  8. Stakeholder Relationship Maps: Short Summary of the project DB AG (Client) overall responsibility of all public transport routes in the FRG Owns BMVBS DB Netze Owns Experts commissioned DB Projektbau (Agent) gives advises University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 Influence Public Agency (TÖB’s) Contracts with Contractors SECTION 2 -PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  9. Stakeholder Relationship Maps: Structure of the External Stakeholders DB AG (Client) Privates Individuals companies Public Agencies (TÖB’s) Owns Influence DB Projektbau (Agent) Influence Owns to 100% 3. Examine and preparing the contract & sign University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 realize EU 4. countersign NBS/ABS Nuremberg - Ingolstadt “EC” Verification of the system and funding 1. Request for funding BMVBS Federal Republic of Germany 2. Recommendation EBA SECTION 2 -PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  10. Stakeholder Relationship Maps: Structure of Public Agencies (Töb’s) Protect land- and landscape history Archaeology Public Agency (TÖB’s) Noise pollution from the track Tries to prevent the project Local neighboursto the NBS / ABS Hearing authority Affected with there own piece of land Association: BN Bavaria University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 Regional council of Upper Bavaria Administrative district offices Local landowners Upper authority Lower authority Note: For a more precise schedule of the Regional Council of Upper Bavaria, see Page 32

  11. MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Attitude Analysis University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 Note: To give an short overview above the Attitude, Influence and Impact, we decided to use a valuation system: ++ Very positive / highest ; + positive / high; 0 neutral; - negative / low; -- very negative / very low SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  12. MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Attitude Analysis University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  13. MEGAPROJECT External Stakeholder Attitude Analysis University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 2 - PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

  14. MEGAPROJECT Project Performance Aspects of Performance Concerned with Doing the Project Right University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 4 - PROJECT PERFORMANCE

  15. Bad Cost Performance at the NBS/ABS The exploding costs at the NBS / ABS Nuremberg-Ingolstadt are a result of some different aspects. • The variety number of ecological interventions In the environment (e.g. Creating of new retention rooms) • Geological risk (e.g. Some different aspects during the tunnel construction • Building ground problems • Archaeological diggings to prevent the land history • Noise protection measures to prevent the neighbors of the track from intolerable noises • Price increase from 1985 to 2002 • Political price? University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06

  16. Aspects of Performance Concerned with Doing the Right Project University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 4 - PROJECT PERFORMANCE

  17. MEGAPROJECT Project Environment Legal and Regulatory Environment University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 5 - PROJECT ENVIRONMENT

  18. MEGAPROJECT Project Environment Political Environment University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06 SECTION 5 - PROJECT ENVIRONMENT

  19. Main aspects for the cs and future research (Sp) • SHM (which groups, typical topics and problems, lessons learned, best practice) • Legal process (typical problems, time, what needs time, lessons learned, best practice) • Organisation client side (LL, BB) • Type of contracts (LL, BB) • Maturity of PM / does a structured PM exist (not only Y7n, how, details)? Which elements? (PC, RM, SHM, ConfM) • Cost performance (base? Reasons for cost changes/overflow) • Systematic of cost fixing • Time performance (base? Reasons for time changes/overflow) • Did the project fulfill the project targets, scope, ROI? • Life cycle aspect • Cultural influence University of Kassel Prof Konrad Spang - MP Transport 12-02-06

More Related