150 likes | 290 Views
Proposed Sobering Center Status Update Public Safety Committee May 7, 2012. Sobering Center Benefits Revisited. Reduce jail population without threatening public safety Streamline/reduce processing time to return officers to the street faster
E N D
Proposed Sobering Center Status Update Public Safety Committee May 7, 2012
Sobering Center Benefits Revisited • Reduce jail population without threatening public safety • Streamline/reduce processing time to return officers to the street faster • Allow officers to give serious or life threatening crimes more attention • Reduce hazards to intoxicated individuals and the general public • Provide professional short-term triage, observation and necessary outpatient services and links to long-term treatment • More cost effective/long-term approach for the City 2
Proposed SiteStar of Hope Facility – North Downtown Private / Public Partnership 3
Proposed Facility Aerial View* * Address: 150 N. Chenevert Street (Key Map reference – 493M)
Creating the Public/Private Partnership • City Council authorizes the creation of a Public / Private Partnership in the form of a “Local Government Corporation” (LGC) for the Sobering Center • The LGC Board will be comprised of 5 members, including 4 directors and a Chair: • 2 City of Houston appointees • 2 Star Of Hope appointees • Chair to be selected by 4 Board Members • All 5 appointees will be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by City Council 5
LGC Service Contract The LGC Executive Director will be the key manager, reporting directly to • the LGC Board and will be responsible for all Sobering Center personnel and • operations of this secular facility. • The facility will require health screening for entering detainees - which is done in • the city’s jail today. • LGC will acquire liability insurance, directors and officer insurance and other • insurance as appropriate. LGC will contract with SOH for lead referral services • SOH has offered a counselor at no cost • LGC will facilitate connections with other allied social service providersand invite their participation 6
Architectural Rendering* 7 * Illustrative purposes only.
Proposed Revised Scope Build-out of second floor for HPD Mental Health Unit • Alcohol addiction, homelessness or mental illness likely with Sobering Center population • On-site collaboration: • Development case management plans • Case-by-case consultation • Information exchange • MHU has national reputation for “best practices” in its field of expertise • CIRT, CCSI, HOT, DOJ Learning Site
Sobering Center Costs • General Fund: $1.5 mil annual cost for lease, utilities and staff • Voter approved Public Safety Bonds:Option 1 - $2.8 mil for first floor build-out with 84 beds and other improvementsOption 2 - $3.3 mil for Option 1 + second floor build-out but no improvementsOption 3 - $4.2 mil for Option 2 + second floor build-out with furniture, fixtures and restrooms 11
May 9, 2012 Request for Council Action Create LGC, including board of directors • Appropriate $235,584 of General Fund monies for FY13 lease payments • Appropriate $4.28 mil of available Public Safety Bonds for build-out Option 3 - HPD’s Mental Health Unit will co-locate on second floor of facility - City will monitor construction process and expenditures
Eventual Cost Recovery • Reduction of staff within the jail operation • Reduce associated jail operation support costs (e.g., meals) • Possible donations for Sobering Center operations from private sector donors
Conclusion • Availability of and ready access to ongoing community-based outpatient substance abuse services is a potential cost reduction and productivity improvement step for the City • Sobering Center activities are consistent with medical professionals’ definition of the treatment of addiction as a disease. • Sobering Centers in other cities have proven to be time savers for patrol officers, allowing them quick return to their assigned neighborhoods. • With a successful link to social service agencies, there will be fewer public intoxication-related calls requiring officer intervention – hence more time they can direct to more pressing crime. 14
Questions 15