The unsociable sociability

2. The unsociablesociability • The individual is a part societies, wantsto be, needto be; • At the same time the individualrecognizethathe is unsocial, becausethere is always a feeling or thoughtsthateveryoneshouldadjustto ”me”, or ”to my idea”, whichleadresistance, negotiation, isolation, or evenviolence • Individualslearn from this and develop moral standards, norms , legal framework, institutions, processes...

3. There is alwayshope! • The individualcan and do createhisownlaws, he has the autonomi to do that. The individual must decidewhat is right or wrong, good or bad (The categoricalimperative). • It is a freedomthatcommits, the situation ”push and pull” , it is conditions for develop”rulesof the game or relations”. • Thisstrengthen the ideaofdemocracy, equality, moral education, individuality and the existential paradox ofunsocialablesociability

4. The Nordic co-operative way It is not a place It is…A wayofthinking A wayofdoing A wayofrelating A wayofexperience A wayoffeeling

5. What is Culture in thiscontext? Simplified: Knowledge Thinking Values and norms Enviroment Relations Acting

6. Culturalheritage is about… • Politicalcultureofdemocracy, negotiation, diplomacy, secularstate, defence (not aggressive militarypower), peace and work for securityetc • Economiccultureof market and mixed economy, public health and sustainibility • Social cultureofwelfare stat, social investment state, healthylifestyle, leadership and organizationetc • The cultureofpeople movements, peopleeducation, democratizationofeducation, art, artefactsetc • Humanistic culture, the autonomous and freeindividual, welleducated, social and co-operative, promoted and supported by state and etc • The ideaof social contract: Between independent individuals in familrelations, organisations , localmunicipalities, states

7. The Nordic co-operative wayEquality, individuality, social trust Democracy – politicalbodies KnowledgePeopletopeople- evaluationPeopleeducation Media TeachersProducers/actorsSchools - resources - activities - output - outcome - impact

8. Experience on interaction WeakStrong • Poorknowledge - Goodknowledge • Weaknetwork - Densenetwork • Different ”languages” - Common • Different norms and - Similarattitudes • Different vision - Shared vision • Low trust - High trust • Negative incentiveto - positive incentivescollaboratetocollaborate

9. Regional Co-operation

10. Cross-borderCo-operation at local and regionallevel

12. Inclusivetrustbuilding co-operation

13. Positive feedback system

14. EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea RegionPA Education

15. EU:s strategy for Baltic Sea Strategy The first makroregional strategy Adress common challanges Demand co-operation och co-ordination betweenmemberstates Needpolitical support, commitment and ownership EUSBSR is a part of EU2020.

16. EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen

17. EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen

18. EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen Styrning

19. EU:s strategi för Östersjöregionen The strategy in practice? COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK for 2014-2020: European Structural and Investment Funds (ERDF, ESF, CF, EMFF, EAFRD) SEED MONEY FACILITIES: Swedish Institute, IB.SH, CBSS, Nordic Council of Ministers OTHER EUROPEAN UNION FUNDS: Connecting Europe Facility, Horizon 2020, LIFE + programme, COSME, Erasmus for all, new environment action programme, etc. OTHER INSTRUMENTS: e.g. International Banks, national, regional and local funds, private funds and investments, funding resources provided by international institutions, etc.

20. Focus on the goodlife, human and citizen right togetherwitheffective problem solutions 6 5 4 1 2 3

21. Motivesbehind participation? • Moral/normative participation. Believe in the values, ethics , idea • Calculated participation: ”What´s in it for me?” • Pragmatic participation: Does it work? Will there be some resultat? • Alienatedparticipation: I have no identifikation, do not understand, but I am part of it by tradition etc

22. Whyparticipate? • Public good • Partner in policy- and decisionmaking • To feelaffinity • To have the status as a equal partner in problemsolving (remeber the existantial paradox) • Reduced risk, or increasedsecurity or safety

23. MAKRO ”Owner” Producers MESO/MIKRO

24. Program x EU ”Crossboarder Makroregional Team, projects” National Regions Local Units Individuals

25. Important is • Solveactual and relevant problems • Relievethrough service • Facilitate- towrite and adminstrateprojects - tofindfunding - tofindknowledge - tofind partners • Promotedecideddevelopment • Prevent risks • Look afterinterest, engagemant • Supportthrough co-operation, experts • RepresentPR, lobbying etc

26. Impact-culture! 6 5 4 1 2 3

27. PoliticalimpactGoals and meansLevel Economicimpact ” ” ” Social impact ” ” ” Culturalimpact ” ” ” Knowledge – values – environment- collaboration

28. Attitude • The ”system” in open in bothends • There is room for improvement • It is a work in progress • Wecan make it better • Weareabletosolve problems • Wetake charge of different opions and interest and find common solutions • There is no suchthing as a definitive form • The currentstructure is not the only right one • Wehavetohave a balancedinsightinto the challangesahead • Wehavetohave an intelligent responsestothem • ”Welcomeaboard, everyonecancontribute”

29. Message ”Identity” From Process Solution, models Towards Co-operation