1 / 39

Characterizing the Far-infrared Properties of Distant X-ray Detected AGNs

Characterizing the Far-infrared Properties of Distant X-ray Detected AGNs. Author: J.R.Mullaney et al. Reporter: Saiyu Hou ( 侯赛玉 ). Outline. Background Data Results Discussion Summary. Outline. Background Data Results Discussion Summary. Background. X-ray

orly
Download Presentation

Characterizing the Far-infrared Properties of Distant X-ray Detected AGNs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Characterizing the Far-infrared Properties of Distant X-ray Detected AGNs Author: J.R.Mullaney et al. Reporter: SaiyuHou (侯赛玉)

  2. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  3. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  4. Background • X-ray • Infrared (MIR:5-30 µm FIR:30-300µm) • AGNs & Star burst systems

  5. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  6. Data • X-ray: CDF-S • Spitzer-IRS spectra • Comparison samples • IRAS data for the Swift-BAT sample • NGC 1068& NGC 6240 • distance QSO

  7. Data: Chandra Data • 1 Ms CDF-S • Classification (AGNs /SF galaxies) • Absorption corrected Lx and NH, Redshift • Absorption and selection bias • Full sample, Restricted sample

  8. Data: Spitzer Data • 24 µm and 70 µm sources • Matching with X-ray sources • Stacking (most X-ray sources not detected at 70 µm)

  9. Data: Comparison Samples • Swift-BAT Sample • Separating the sample into AGN or SB dominating • S70/S24 ratio (out to z~1.5) • 70 µm flux density can predict the LIR

  10. Data: Comparison Sample • NGC 1068: heavily obscured typeII AGN with a hidden broad line region • NGC 6240: SB- dominated at IR, heavily obscured faint X-ray AGN • QSO: luminous and unobscured type I AGNs

  11. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  12. Results • S70/S24 ratio: distinguish AGN or SB dominating IR SEDs • Calculating IR lum of 70 µm-detected AGNs

  13. Results • no difference in the ratio between BLAGNs and non-BLAGNs, X-ray abs and unabs AGNs • the material that absorbs photons at X-ray and optical wavelengths is optically thin to rest frame MIR–FIR radiation

  14. Results • 70 µm detected CDF-S X-ray AGNs are typically more IR luminous than their counterparts in the BAT/IRAS sample local AGNs • 70 µm detected SBs have higher LIR/LX ratios than most of the 70 µm detected AGNs

  15. Results • more X-ray luminous AGNs may have, on average, more AGN-dominated SEDs • LX = 1042-43 erg/s AGNs’ LIR/LX evolves strongly with redshift • LX = 1043-44 erg/s AGNs’ LIR/LX increases less conclusive • Searching for intrinsically bright LX = 1043-44 erg/s AGNs, or Compton-thick AGNs

  16. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  17. What is driving the increase in LIR • Increasing star formation • Large AGN dust covering factors: intrinsic emission reprocessed by dust

  18. Contribution to cosmic IR background • AGNs’ contribution to the 70 µm background is very small • Bright AGNs are rare in CDF-S

  19. Expected form Herschel

  20. Outline • Background • Data • Results • Discussion • Summary

  21. Summary 1 • at both 24 µm and 70 µm • For LX= 1042-43erg/s AGNs LIR/LX ratio increase • the average LIR at z = 1 − 2 is significantly higher than those at z = 0.5 − 1 and z ≈ 0 • For LX= 1043-44erg/s AGNs, not • A method to identify Compton-thick AGNs

  22. Summary 2 • The process driving the increase • Increased star-formation • Increased AGN dust covering factors

  23. Summary 3 • more X-ray luminous CDF-S AGNs have more AGN-dominated IR SEDs

  24. Summary 4 • X-ray detected AGNs in the CDF-S contribute only a little of the 70 µm background

  25. Summary 5 • Herschel Space Observatory • the FIR diagnostics able to discriminate between AGNs with SB- or AGN-dominated IR SEDs

  26. Thanks

More Related