160 likes | 483 Views
EXPLORATION STRATEGIES : Simple Observations, Significant Implications John R Parry Executive General Manager - Exploration WMC Resources Ltd. SMEDG – AIG Symposium : Sydney : April 27, 2001. OBSERVATION 1 : Most of the mineral industry's wealth is captured by a handful of giant deposits.
E N D
EXPLORATION STRATEGIES :Simple Observations, Significant ImplicationsJohn R ParryExecutive General Manager - Exploration WMC Resources Ltd SMEDG – AIG Symposium : Sydney : April 27, 2001
OBSERVATION 1 :Most of the mineral industry's wealth is captured by a handful of giant deposits Cumulative NPV @ 8% discount rate BASE METALS 2/3rds of wealth comes from 10% of all projects 129 Deposits with total value of US$32Billion in 1994 dollars Base Metal Mines discovered in Canada & Australia to 1988 Source : Derived from Mackenzie 1995
IMPLICATIONS :Giant Deposits For Junior Companies • Small deposits can give good IRRs, but NPV will be small • Finding a giant deposit can be a “Company-Maker”(ie as the Carlin District was for Barrick and Newmont) • Need to focus on finding giant deposits, as only these : • Are of the right scale to make a significant impacton the company’s business • Provide a sufficiently large return to pay for ongoing exploration costs For Major Companies
OBSERVATION 2 :Within a district, most of the endowment is tied up in handful of deposits Gold Endowment (koz) at St Ives Junction Victory Argo Revenge Leviathan 35 Deposits8.1 moz Au Endowment = Current Reserves + Cumulative Production Source : WMC Dec 1999
OBSERVATION 3 :In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first Gold Discoveries at Norseman (koz) Royal1940 koz Mararoa 1160 koz Crown1080 koz Bullen270 koz OK180 koz Harlequin270 koz Deposit Size discovered Year of Startup Source : WMC Dec 1998
OBSERVATION 3 :In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first … and for the least explorn $ Gold Discoveries at Norseman (koz) Yr 2000 A$m Deposit Size discovered Exploration Expenditures Year of Startup Source : WMC Dec 1998 Note : Excludes “Extensional” exploration
IMPLICATIONS :Big deposits are found first For Major Companies • Avoid grassroots exploration in mature districts. If you are not first or second, you are probably too late • Need to continuously assess the maturity of the district (a good indicator is the discovery cost per unit of metal). At some point in time, brownfields exploration for medium-sized deposits becomes uneconomic
IMPLICATIONS :Deposit size-frequency For Major Companies • Should have a large tenement package as this : • Raises the probability that the largest deposit is on your tenement • Facilitates incremental discoveries – even smaller mines feeding into a large central mill can be financially attractive For Junior Companies • Small deposits are often found near giants and there are a lot more of them to find • Small discoveries may end up being sold to a larger operator next door (key issue – will you get a fair price ?) or operated on their own
OBSERVATION 4 :New concepts/technology can help reinvigorate a mature district … Cumulative Copper Resources Discovered in Chile (mt Cu) Outcroppingore bodies Porphyry model applied to outcrop Persistant explorn in known camps Chuquicamata La Escondida New Process Technology SXEW El Teniente Covered ore zones Year Discovered Source : WMC 1997 … but the pay-off gets smaller each time
IMPLICATIONS :Be Innovative • Innovation can be in several forms : • New search methods (Airborne Gravity) • New conceptual models (Olympic Dam) • New process technologies (SXEW for Cu, Heap Leaching for Au) • New financing methods (gold loans, project finance) • Strong relationships with local communities & governments • Remember that Observations 1 to 3 still apply • In a mature district, must have a new concept/technology to be a “new” first mover For Major Companies For Junior Companies • Can be a fast follower, but must understand the strategic implications/limitations
OBSERVATION 5 :In terms of finding big deposits, the majors have a better track record than the juniors Discovery Performance for Majors vs. Juniors : 1989-99) 17% 25% 5% 37% 5% 78% 70% 63% note : Based on Western World discoveries in 1989-98 of gold and base metals with an in-situ value >US$1B Source : Metals Economic Group July 2000
IMPLICATIONS :On average, perception doesn’t match reality for large deposits • Risky to rely on juniors to be your de facto exploration team • As always, the right partner is critical For Junior Companies • Success of juniors in finding “small” deposits has led to a false impression with respect to large discoveries For Major Companies
OBSERVATION 6 :Average cost of finding big deposits appears to be rising Exploration Cost per Large Discovery : June 2000 US$m Average for 1989-98 was US$560m per Major Discovery note : Rise may be due to lack of recent data na note : Based on Western World discoveries of gold and base metals with an in-situ value >US$1B Source : Metals Economic Group July 2000
IMPLICATIONS :Rising finding costs For Major Companies • Corporate view that it is “cheaper” to buy than to find is leading to : • General cutback in grassroots exploration • Increased reliance on acquiring other company’s discoveries For Junior Companies • More difficult to raise risk money : • Risk capital has shifted to the technology sector • Increased reliance on majors for funding General issues for the Industry : On average, exploration doesn’t seem to pay its way Replacement of existing mines
SUMMARY : Simple Observations • Most of the minerals industry’s wealth is captured by a handful of giant deposits • Within a district, most of the endowment Is tied up in handful of deposits • In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first … and for the least exploration cost • New concepts can help reinvigorate a mature district • In terms of finding giant deposits, the majors have a better track record than the juniors • Average cost of finding giant deposits appears to be rising
CONCLUSIONS : Significant Implications The observation is that there are plenty of options, however …. • A strategy based on exceptions will fail on average • There is more than one good strategy • If you have a strategy but don’t follow it, you don’t have a strategy • Can’t afford to be “average” at exploration • Majors must focus on exploring for (and developing) world-class deposits For a given Company the “correct” exploration strategy will depend upon : Relationships with others Financial resources Technical capabilities Existing operations Time horizon Attitude to risk