60 likes | 396 Views
draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-00-txt draft-ietf-radext-redirection-00-txt IETF 65 – Dallas,TX Bernard Aboba Farid Adrangi Paul Congdon Avi Lior Mauricio Sanchez The Split draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01 split into three documents draft-ietf-radext-vlan-00 : Bernard Aboba lead editor
E N D
draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-00-txtdraft-ietf-radext-redirection-00-txtdraft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-00-txtdraft-ietf-radext-redirection-00-txt IETF 65 – Dallas,TX Bernard Aboba Farid Adrangi Paul Congdon Avi Lior Mauricio Sanchez
The Split • draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-01 split into three documents • draft-ietf-radext-vlan-00 : Bernard Aboba lead editor • draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-00 : Mauricio Sanchez lead editor • draft-ietf-radext-redirection-00 : editor TBA • Why? • Contentious filtering attributes impeded progress of entire document • Split allows staging of attribute delivery • draft-ietf-radext-vlan-00 completed WGLC last week • draft-ietf-radext-fiter-00 no later than Oct. 2006 • draft-ietf-radext-redirection no later than Dec. 2006
Attribute Summary draft-ietf-radext-ieee802-00/01 VLAN attributes Egress-VLAN-ID Ingress-Filters VLAN-Name Quality of Service Attributes User-Priority-Table QoS-Filter-Rule Filter Attributes NAS-Filter-Rule Acct-NAS-Filter-Rule EAP Accounting Acct-EAP-Auth-Method draft-ietf-radext-vlan-00 VLAN attributes Egress-VLAN-ID Ingress-Filters VLAN-Name Quality of Service Attributes User-Priority-Table draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-00 Filter Attributes NAS-Traffic-Rule Acct-NAS-Traffic-Rule draft-ietf-radext-redirection-00 TBD Likely just guidelines for NAS-Traffic-Rule
“filter” draft issues and work items • Renamed NAS-Filter-Rule attribute to NAS-Traffic-Rule to avoid immediate confusion with Diameter’s version • Closure of number of issues • I102 : NAS/QOS-Filter-Rule • I109 : HTTP NAS-Filter-Rule assumes port 80 • I110 : Compliance and Coherence • I112 : NAS-Filter-Rule • I116 : Technical Comments • I129 : Editorial NITS • Pending (Filter-01) • I167 : Compatibility with RFC2866 and RFC3576 • I168 : Editorial Comments
“filter” draft open issues • I111 – Accounting (Greg W.) • Proposal to remove suspect wording sent to email list • I114 – NAS-Filter-Rule Accounting (Bernard A.) • Use case sent to email list • Discussed at IETF64 • I115 – NITs (Dave N.) • Mostly closed; There is dependency on I114 for one • I130 – Diameter Interoperability (Bernard A.) • I164 – Review (Jari A.) • Misc. NITS; mostly closed except for Diameter issue (as I130) • I169 – Handling unparseable rules (Greg W.) • I170 – Precedence and Order for NAS-Filter-Rule (Greg W.)
I130 – Diameter Compatibility • At IETF 64 tenuous consensus was to: a. Not split-up attribute into multiple attribute b. Use existing practices to allow Diameter to inherit RADIUS NAS-Filter-Rule attribute c. Rename attribute to avoid confusion • Consensus fell apart on point B • “Diameter community should get their say on rule syntax” • “We shouldn’t have two related yet non-compatible attributes” • New proposal: Radius/Diameter Lockstep • DIME WG exposed to current rule syntax and given opportunity to speak up; No one thus far • RADEXT WG completes attribute with DIME WG formal blessing of syntax • DIME WG updates Diameter with *same* syntax from RADIUS