270 likes | 700 Views
Internet Maintenance, Coordination, and Development. Internet Governance. Fred Baker. One discussion, many questions. The subject of “Internet Governance” covers a range of questions, few of which actually have to do with governing the Internet Mostly has to do with
E N D
Internet Maintenance, Coordination, and Development Internet Governance Fred Baker
One discussion,many questions • The subject of “Internet Governance” covers a range of questions, few of which actually have to do with governing the Internet • Mostly has to do with • The roles of public and private sector • Decision and management processes • Power and control • Development
Broad question:Who will control the Internet? • Issues of control • Internet names and numbers • Management of the DNS root • Management of the ENUM root • Specification development • Public sector vs. private sector models
Public sector • Historically had a lot to do with telecom, • Tends to ask why are we not responsible for its operation?
Private sector • Tends to ask what is so broken about private sector management that we have to change it? • Engendered much of Internet technology • DARPA, NSF, NASA, DOE money • Currently responsible to run Internet.
Issues in power and control • Laws people would like to pass • Services governments would like to mandate • Politics of these services • Standardization
Laws people would like to pass • Pornography • Viruses • Spam • Taxation
Services governments would like to mandate • Lawful intercept • Internet intelligence gathering • MLPP/GETS-style emergency services
Politics of these services: • Who pays for the service? • Often an unfunded mandate • Privacy issues • Often with technical or economic side-effects
Standardization • ITU-T is more familiar to many nations (de jure) • IETF has historically been writing the specifications (de facto)
What is the place of the United States in Internet politics? • Issue of national sovereignty • Basically US vs. everyone else • ICANN politics
Issue of national sovereignty • If the us government in fact runs the Internet on behalf of all the other countries, perhaps through its surrogates, in what way are those countries?
Basically US vs. everyone else • US view • Us has played a custodial role • Is slowly trying to get out. • Sought non-US participation early • Funded initial development • Non-US view • US has played a custodial role • Slowly trying to get out, or perhaps not at all.
ICANN politics • ICANN is seen by some as a private sector surrogate for the US government • Resented • Especially as it is licensed by the US government • Has to run certain decisions by US DOC NTIA
One of two things has to happen • ICANN has to be/become independent of the US government, or • A replacement acceptable to other governments must come into being
Broad Question:Developing nations • What is the role of the developing country? • What do developing countries want from the 'digital developments'? • Is it a consumer, a full player, something in between? • Where does needed education and development (and money) come from?
Questions before the house • How will the standards process be timely and effective for all concerned? • How will new Internet applications be developed and deployed? • National sovereignty issues • Public sector vs. private sector debate • What is the place of developing nations?
Standards for new models, facilities, and services • Called for by service providers, enterprise networks, and governments. • The standards process, • The process of writing these technology and policy specifications, • Now done by a combination of overlapping • National standards bodies • International public-sector-sponsored • International private-sector groups and fora • How will the standards process be timely and effective for all concerned?
New Internet applications • Innovative services and applications • RFID facilities and inventory management processes, • Social software, • Web services, • File sharing, • Rapidly deploying new services that the Internet infrastructure was not necessarily designed to handle.
Questions regarding Internet applications • With new applications come difficult policy questions • Detection of, access to, and management of • The devices • The information they exchange. • Where and how will these be discussed, • How will the necessary new policies be designed?
National sovereignty:International law • Sovereignty has historically meant that • A nation is absolutely in control of what happens within it, • Bears no responsibility for what exits from its borders.
Changing international law • Maritime law • A nation is responsible for some of the side-effects of what it permits • Pollution • Over-taxing of resources. • The Internet challenges that • Robustness principle • Be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you receive • Do for/to others what you would have them do to you
Internet impact on international law. • Increasingly, nations are responsible for spam, viruses, and attacks that cross their borders.
Changing law regarding sovereignty • In what areas does the nation-state remain responsible only to itself, and in what areas must it forge agreements with its neighbors? • What structures will best facilitate brokering and maintaining those agreements?
Public sector vs. private sector in network operation • Are there only two ways? • Is there a third possible way? • What is the best model for managing the names and numbers in the Internet? • What is the best way to build operational policy for the Internet?
What is the place of developing nations? • Are they doomed to forever be consumers of other nations' products? • Can they produce technology? How can they use Internet technology to overcome the digital divide? • What is the proper role of more industrialized countries in facilitating this?
Internet Maintenance, Coordination, and Development Internet Governance Fred Baker