1 / 15

Integrated Safety and Environmental Management

Integrated Safety and Environmental Management. M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 13 May 2009. Construction, Commissioning, Operations Readiness for Users DOE O 450.1 / Safety Management System (ISM) DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management DOE O 420.2A / Accelerator Safety

ostinmannual
Download Presentation

Integrated Safety and Environmental Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Safety and Environmental Management M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 13 May 2009

  2. Construction, Commissioning, Operations Readiness for Users • DOE O 450.1 / Safety Management System (ISM) • DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management • DOE O 420.2A / Accelerator Safety The Environmental Assessment developed for the LCLS resulted in a Finding of No Significant Impact

  3. Far Experimental Hall Near Experimental Hall 1st Undulator

  4. Construction, Commissioning, Operations - Readiness for Users • DOE O 450.1 / Safety Management System • SLAC Integrated Safety and Environmental Management Plan • SLAC ES&H Manual and Guideline for Operations • DOE O 413.3A / Program and Project Management • Lessons Learned (413.3A) • SNS and NIF Lessons Learned documents • development of LCLS Project ES&H/Safety Lessons Learned • SLAC process driven by Operating Experience Program (210.2) • DOE O 420.2B / Accelerator Safety • Accelerator Readiness Reviews • Safety Assessment Document • Accelerator Safety Envelope • Experimental Area Readiness Reviews • Ready for Users

  5. ISM Process Construction of buildings, installation of technical systems, commissioning and operations through the Electron Beam Dump • LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents • Physics Requirements Documents, Engineering Specification Documents, Preliminary & Final Design Reviews, etc • LCLS Work Authorization (Lab’s WPC process) • Preliminary and Final Design Review + SLAC SOC Reviews • Project Management sign-off • LCLS Project ES&H Plan(Lab’s ES&H process) • Job Safety Analysis • Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings • PM/UTR manages each subcontract • Management Safety Observation Process (adopted by Lab) • Positive reinforcement of safety • CF5 Feed back & Improvement • Lessons Learned

  6. ISM Process cont’d Commissioning and Operations – Ready for Users • Injector • Accelerator Readiness Review (2007) • Beam Line to Beam Switch Yard • Undulator Complex • Accelerator Readiness Review (2008) • Front End Enclosure • Internal Review with SSO Approval (now) • Update of SAD and ASE • Beam Authorization Sheet • Safety Officer Approvals • Experimental Areas • Accelerator Readiness Review (June) • Instrument Readiness Review for each Experimental Station • AMO Commissioning (July) • Begin general User Program (Sept)

  7. PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCEThrough March 2009 DART Rate • Total Project Hours • 2.16 M Hours worked • DART Rate 1.03 • SubContractors • 597 K Hours worked • DART Rate 3.02 (9 Incidents) • TRC Rate 4.02 (3 Incidents) • LCLS Collaboration • 1,566 K Hours worked • DART Rate 0.26 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort.DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0.25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0.65 per 100 FTEs.

  8. CF & Technical Systems Stewardship • Excellent Safety Record • 120K+ hours w/o injury (TRC or DART) • S20, MMF, Injector, Linac TSI, S522, LTU • Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers • Direct management of subcontractors • Communicate ES&H Expectations • Guide them to success • Enforcement when needed • Thorough Work Planning and Control • Aggressive ISM management • Issues identified and addressed immediately • Positive Results • Ownership of safety

  9. Dec ‘05 Feb ‘07

  10. Nov ‘05 Dec ‘08

  11. CF CMGC Stewardship • October ’06 thru April ’07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations • Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting • Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate • PMT changes, Deficiency Notices, Fines • May ’07 thru November ’07 Full Production : DARTs • Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan • Communication with Corporate TCCo • Safety Stewardship Committee Established • Full time on-site medic (+30hr OSHA) • December ’07 thru April ’08 : Some progress, then… • Two DARTs associated with one sub • Work stopped • May ’08 thru December ’08 : No DARTs • Effective work planning & execution • Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings • JSA review with workers throughout the day • Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices

  12. July ‘07 Nov ‘07 Dec ‘06 Apr ‘08

  13. Near Experimental Hall November 2008 Far Experimental Hall December 2008

  14. Conclusion • Integrated Safety and Environmental Management(450.1) • Following SLAC ISEMS Process • SLAC ES&H Manual • Work Planning and Control • Lessons Learned (413.3A) • SLAC program (210.2) • Following LCLS ISM management practices • LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents • Reviews, Authorizations, Continuous Improvement • Accelerator Safety • Safety Assessment Document • Accelerator Safety Envelope • Readiness Reviews • Accelerator • Experimental Areas Ready for Users

  15. End of presentation

More Related