200 likes | 331 Views
Informal stakeholder consultation Improving the quality and effectiveness of development cooperation with African agricultural knowledge organisations EC, Brussels , 20-22 March 2012. FARA’s evolution as a weaver of knowledge networks. Prof. Monty P. Jones Executive Director, FARA.
E N D
Informal stakeholder consultation Improving the quality and effectiveness of development cooperation with African agricultural knowledge organisations EC, Brussels, 20-22 March 2012 FARA’s evolution as a weaver of knowledge networks Prof. Monty P. Jones Executive Director, FARA
Presentation Outline • Background • FARA’s experience (one case particularly relevant for learning) • What worked well and less well and why • Funding (2008-2011); sources, level and mechanisms • Outlook for the future: challenges and opportunities
Background • Growth of African economies is hugely dependent on performance of agriculture • Productivity growth is a key driver for agric. performance & poverty reduction—accounts for ½ of 6% CAADP target
FARA’s Value Proposition a strategic platform for networking to reinforce capacities of Africa’s agricultural research system Improved performance of institutions & entire R&D system; better quality R&D plans, policies & program designs Improved productivity, competitiveness & Markets
FARA: single hub network (2002-2007) FARA started as (single hub network) • provide African vision of AR4D • advocacy and resource mobilisation; • promote exchange of info, tech & HR FAAP SSA CP SCARDA DONATA RAILS Demanded greater understanding of constituents = NARS Assessment NARIS, FO, NGOs, PS
FARA: facilitating multi-hubs (2007-2012) Providing networking support functions • advocacy and policy; • access to knowledge and technologies; • capacity strengthening; • partnership and strategic alliances.
Testing & scaling out innovative approaches Enhancing R&D impact Stakeholder Consultations Institutional strengthening NARS Assessment SCARDA Piloting an innovative approach for institutional strengthening SSA CP Formulate IAR4D & assess its performance Evaluation Evaluation & reflection Scale out approach via e.g. CAADP Processes, CRPs, GCARD Scale out approach via e.g. CAADP Process
Testing & scaling out innovative approaches Others Consultations + scoping studies • Linking universities, agribusiness and research (UniBRAIN) • Safe Stewardship of biotechnologies (SABIMA) • Strategic alliances with other regions & countries (Europe, Brazil, China)—PAEPARD Knowledge & Technologies RAILS + DONATA Test innovative approaches for knowledge management & technology dissemination Jean Jacques Andrianaivo farmer Leader from Madagascar (http://www.erails.net/MG/jean-jacques-a/) Co-creation & co-learning Scale out approach via e.g. CAADP Process
Impacts • Achieved jointly with partners (AUC, NPCA, RECs, SROs, CGIAR, actors in Research, Extension & Education; Farmer Organizations, private sector, DPs, etc) • SCARDA focal institutions: • Positive changes outnumbered negative ones 4:1 • RAILS • (Initially ~3,000 stakeholders in 29 countries enhance capacity to communicate & access knowledge • DONATA • Farming communities expand livelihood sources by ~50-100% in 21 countries • CAADP • 21 IPs aligned with FAAP principles • Impacts from pilots are to be replicated numerous times by scaling out • SSA CP Pilot site in Nigeria • 120% ↑ in yield of soyabeans (0.9 – 2.0t/ha) • Additional US$500/ha / season • 150K farmer beneficiaries
What worked well (success factors) • Focusing on major constraints cutting across the region • A common framework for the continent (the FAAP) • Strong buy-in by stakeholders across the value chain and at all geographical scales • Partnerships for action • Funding: availability + stability especially for core functions (MDTF)
Challenges & why Why • Fragmentation (stakeholders, geog scale--subsidiarity) • Low absorption capacities of stakeholders • Funding: shortfalls + competition among partner institutions • High transaction costs of working thru partnerships • Challenges reflect state of Africa’s science & innovation and are the focus of FARA interventions • New approaches & partnerships require incubation period to build trust and accountability among partners
Expenditure (2008-2011) 19.3m Core funds managed through MDTF; TBAs: Bilateral agreements 17.2m 15.9m 11.5m 75% 60% 81% 68%
FARA’s funding (2003-2018): Expenditure, budgeted & projected Expenditure (actuals) Projection Budget TBAs TBAs TBAs MDTF2 MDTF1 MDTF1 Core (bilateral) Core (bilateral)
2012 and beyond: looking into the future with increase number of networks, knowledge hubs and stronger linkages among institutions
FARA Secretariat weaving knowledge networks (2012 and beyond)
Going forward …1/2 • Envisaged roles • Connecting (including observatory & think tank) • Catalyzing & • Communicating • FARA set to develop a new MTOP (2014 – 2018) & refresh its strategic plan • Future networking support to focus on: • Advocacy + policy • Knowledge & innovation • Capacities & Institutions • Opportunities & Investments • CAADP: deepen integration of PIV with other pillars; • Central Africa • Education & Extension • Agric. Science agenda (CGIAR--CAADP)
Available funding in millions of US$ (2012-13) & Projected funding requirements for 2014-18
Thank You www.fara-africa.org