240 likes | 410 Views
Chapter 19. Decision Theory. Decision Theory. 19.1 Bayes’ Theorem 19.2 Introduction to Decision Theory 19.3 Decision Making Using Posterior Probabilities 19.4 Introduction to Utility Theory. Bayes’ Theorem.
E N D
Chapter 19 Decision Theory
Decision Theory 19.1 Bayes’ Theorem 19.2 Introduction to Decision Theory 19.3 Decision Making Using Posterior Probabilities 19.4 Introduction to Utility Theory
Bayes’ Theorem • S1, S2, …, Sk represents k mutually exclusive possible states of nature, one of which must be true • P(S1), P(S2), …, P(Sk) represents the prior probabilities of the k possible states of nature • If E is a particular outcome of an experiment designed to determine which is the true state of nature, then the posterior (or revised) probability of a state Si, given the experimental outcome E, is calculated using the formula on the next slide
Example 19.1: AIDS Testing • Suppose that a person selected randomly for testing, tests positive for AIDS • The test is known to be highly accurate • 99.9% for people who have AIDS, 99% for people who do not • What is the probability that the person actually has AIDS? • Surprisingly, much lower than most of us would guess!
Example 19.1: AIDS Testing #2 • AIDS incidence rate is six cases per 1,0000 Americans • P(AIDS) = 0.006 • P(No AIDS) = 0.994 • Testing accuracy: • P(Positive|AIDS) = 0.999 • P(Positive|No AIDS) = 0.01 • Looking for P(AIDS|Positive)
Introduction to Decision Theory • States of nature: A set of potential future conditions that affects decision results • Alternatives: A set of alternative actions for the decision maker to chose from • Payoffs: A set of payoffs for each alternative under each potential state of nature
Decision Making Under Uncertainty • Maximin: Identify the minimum (or worst) possible payoff for each alternative and select the alternative that maximizes the worst possible payoff (Pessimistic) • Maximax: Identify the maximum (or best) possible payoff for each alternative and select the alternative that maximizes the best possible payoff (Optimistic) • Expected value criterion: Using prior probabilities for the states of nature, compute the expected payoff for each alternative and select the alternative with the largest expected payoff
Example: Condominium ComplexSituation • A developer must decide how large a luxury condominium complex to build • Small, medium, or large • Profitability depends on the level of future demand for luxury condominiums • Low or high • Elements of decision theory • States of nature • Low demand versus high demand • Alternatives • Small, medium, large
Example: Condominium ComplexSituation #2 • Maximin • If a small complex is built, the worst payoff is $8 million • If a medium complex is built, the worst payoff is $5 million • If a large complex is build, the worst payoff is -$11 million • Since $8 million is the maximum of these, choose to build a small complex
Example: Condominium ComplexSituation #3 • Maximax • If a small complex is built, the best payoff is $8 million • If a medium complex is built, the best payoff is $15 million • If a large complex is build, the best payoff is $22 million • Since $22 million is the maximum of these, choose to build a large complex
Example: Condominium ComplexSituation #4 • Expected value • Small: Expected value = 0.3($8 million) + 0.7($8 million) = $8 million • Medium: Expected value = 0.3($5 million) + 0.7($15 million) = $12 million • Large: Expected value = 0.3(-$11 million) + 0.7($22 million) = $12.1 million • Since $12.1 million is the maximum of these, choose to build a large complex
Decision Making Using PosteriorProbabilities • When we use expected value to choose the best alternative, we call this prior decision analysis • Often, sample information can be obtained to help us make a better decision • In this case, we compute expected values by using posterior probabilities • We call this posterior decision analysis
Example 19.3: Decision Tree and Payoff Table for Prior Analysis
Example 19.3: The Oil Drilling Case #2 • The oil company can obtain more information by performing a seismic experiment • There are three outcomes • Low, medium, and high
A Decision Tree for a Posterior Analysis of the Oil Drilling Case
Example 19.3: The Oil Drilling Case #4 • Expected payoff of sampling • Low: Expected payoff is $0, probability is 0.646 • Medium: Expected payoff is $334,061, probability is 0.226 • High: Expected payoff is $1,362,500, probability is 0.128 • Expected payoff of sampling (EPS) is $249,898
Example 19.3: The Oil Drilling Case #5 • Expected payoff of no sampling (EPNS) is $0 • Expected value of sample information (EVSI) is • EPS – EPNS • $249,898 - $0 = $249,898 • Expected net gain of sampling (ENGS) is • EVSI – Cost of sample • $249,898 - $100,000 = $149,898
Introduction to Utility Theory • Utilities are measures of the relative value of varying dollar payoffs for an individual decision maker and thus capture the decision maker’s attitude toward risk • Under certain mild assumptions about rational behavior, decision makers should replace dollar payoffs with their respective utilities and maximize expected utility