160 likes | 417 Views
Social innovation in housing. Darinka Czischke Guest Researcher Department of Real Estate and Housing Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft ) The Netherlands. Acknowledgements. David Butler Grant 2012, Chartered Institute of Housing & Ocean Media Group
E N D
Social innovation in housing Darinka Czischke Guest Researcher Department of Real Estate and Housing Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) The Netherlands
Acknowledgements • David Butler Grant 2012, Chartered Institute of Housing & Ocean Media Group • Jill Allcoat, Gavin Smart (CIH) • Prof Vincent Gruis, TU Delft • Prof David Mullins, University of Birmingham
Background • Social innovation revisited in light of 2000’s innovation paradigm • Definitions: OECD/LEED, Stanford Social Innovation Review, NESTA, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, SIX/Young Foundation, Howaldtand Schwarz… • “New ideas –products, services and models- that simultaneously meet social needs and create new social relationships or collaborations” (Mulgan et al., 2007; BEPA 2010) • Housing under-researched
Levels of analysis • Social needs of vulnerable groups • Challenges of society as a whole • Systemic reforms of societal configurations
Aims • Gather housing practitioners’ perceptions on the meaning and usefulness of social innovation in housing • Identify concrete examples in Europe of social innovation in housing • Identify barriers and enablers to implement social innovation in housing
Methods • Scoping interviews with key informants • Literature review on social innovation (in housing) • Questionnaire with housing practitioners (selected EU countries)
SI examples: common elements • User involvement • User perspective • Cross-sector collaboration • Multidimensional approach • Streamlining • User empowerment
Case studies: Main fields where SI elements were found • Demographic change • EU networks • Rationalising community investment • New ways to help vulnerable groups (social experimentation)
Barriers – key informants • Resistance to change • Excessive regulation • Lack of time (long term view) • Lack of government commitment • Political (counter)pressures • Lack of knowledge and information
Enablers – key informants • Openness to experimentation • Opportunities for exchange and cross-learning • Cultural factors • Residents’ participation • Innovative leaders
Conclusions • Nothing really “new”, but… • Conceptualisation as “social innovation” potentially leading to wider diffusion and development • Concept resonates amongst practitioners • Overall pragmatism rather than new paradigm • Role for housing professionals? Leaders or facilitators?