1 / 11

The State Performance Plan and

The State Performance Plan and. The Annual Performance Report. Background. The State Performance Plan (SPP) was established in 2005-06 as a six year plan for Special Education as per IDEA 04. Baseline performance /rigorous goals Included broad stakeholder input

palmer-park
Download Presentation

The State Performance Plan and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The State Performance Plan and The Annual Performance Report

  2. Background • The State Performance Plan (SPP) was established in 2005-06 as a six year plan for Special Education as per IDEA 04. • Baseline performance /rigorous goals • Included broad stakeholder input • Incorporated, as much as possible, the prior Utah Agenda • Includes twenty indicators/targets • Performance • Compliance

  3. Annual Performance Report (APR) • States must report annually to the Secretary on the performance of the State under the SPP • Describes progress on the SPP • Must be publicly disseminated • Foundation for data-based decision making • Improvement activities • Professional development

  4. Activities • Designed to meet targets • Revised annually • Data collected/reviewed/analyzed • Activities reviewed • Retained • Revised • Timeline revised • New activity added

  5. Summary • Indicator • Description • Target • Rate of attainment • Trend data • Whether or not the target was met

  6. Highlights Indicator 5: LRE 5A 2005-06 48.68% 2008-09 52.36% 5B 2005-06 14.72% 2008-09 15.33% 5C 2005-06 3.56% 2008-09 3.23%

  7. Indicator 11: Evaluation within 45 school days • 2005-06 76.2% • 2008-09 96.9%

  8. Indicator 12: C to B Transition • 2005-06 85.8% • 2008-09 98.6%

  9. Indicator 13:Transition Planning • 2005-06 34.92% • 2007-08 78.64%

  10. Indicator 15: Noncompliance Correction • 2005-06 86.8% • 2008-09 98%

  11. Other Highlights • Follow on Summary Sheet

More Related