Download
1 / 35
350 likes | 363 Views
This presentation provides an overview of the State Performance Plan (SPP) and Annual Performance Report (APR) process, including the history, content requirements, and next steps. Stakeholders will have the opportunity to review and provide input on the SPP and improvement activities.
E N D
State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report (APR)Stakeholder PresentationJanuary 2007
State Performance Plan • A six-year (2005-2011) State plan that… • establishes annual benchmarks and six-year targets for… • twenty required indicators • Covers the period - July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2011 What is the State Performance Plan (SPP)?
SPP Process • Process Requires: • Broad stakeholder input • Public dissemination • Annual public report on progress -statewide and for each local education agency
State Performance Plan History of the SPP… • Original SPP submitted on time to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) in December 2005 • Minor revisions were required by the USDE • SPP approved by OSEP in April 2006 • OSEP included two tables of items needing attention in 2005-06 SPP
Present Status • 2005-06 SPP (due February 1, 2007) submitted for SBE review at January meeting • Includes new baselines and targets for several Indicators • Includes OSEP required format changes • Includes OSEP require content changes
Each indicator includes the same, required information: Overview of the Issue/Description of Service or Process Baseline Data for FFY 2004-05 (2004-05)
Discussion of Baseline Data Measurable and Rigorous Benchmarks and Targets Improvement Activities
Monitoring Priorities, Indicators and Measurement requirements are specified in the OSEP indicator documents. In most cases, the measures are very specific and allow little latitude.
If the SPP was approved why did it change? • To add baseline and target data as previously scheduled by OSEP • Indicator 4B, 7, 8, 9,10,11,14,18 • To modify the SPP due to changed instructions required by OSEP • e.g., Statewide assessment table content and format • To aligning SPP data requirements to that of annual Section 618 data collection as required by OSEP • e.g., LRE and Preschool LRE • To modifying the SPP based on OSEP comments that accompanied its approval letter • Preschool Assessment and Parent Involvement to include sample information • Because it is a dynamic document that can be modified with the approval of OSEP
What’s Next for the SPP • Submit a modified/revised SPP in February 2007 • Prepare state and district-level public reports (Indicators 1-14) • Submit Annual Performance Report (APR) in February 2007
The original SPP may be accessed at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/se/qa/documents/spp2005.pdf The SBE approved version may be accessed at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr07/documents/blue-jan07item26.doc
Annual Performance Report What is the Annual Performance Report (APR)? • An annual State report that… • serves as a progress report on the SPP to demonstrate if: • annual benchmarks have been met • improvement activities were completed • for the twenty required indicators
Like the SPP, the APR has required contents for each indicator: • Monitoring Priority • Indicator • - Measurement • Target • Actual Target Data • Discussion of Improvement Activities Completed • Explanation of Progress or Slippage • - Revisions with Justification
For the most part, actual data is analyzed: • statewide, • geographically (north, central, south), • by ethnicity and • by disability.
Generally, a chart summarizing the status of improvement activities is included with each indicator
Assessment
Implications for CDE/SED • Posted on the web • Will replace KPIs • Will be used to guide planning with stakeholders • Will be used by OSEP to monitor states • Compliance indicators will be used by OSEP to make Compliance Determinations per IDEA ‘04
Implications for LEAs • Values posted on the web • Used to select districts for monitoring • Used to identify areas to be addressed in monitoring reviews and improvement planning • Disproportionality • Suspension and Expulsion • Will be used to identify districts who are significantly disproportionate • Used to establish Compliance Determinations per IDEA 04
Annual Performance Report • The APR is due to the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) no later than February 1, 2007 • Reporting period covers • July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006 • Has been reviewed and approved by the SBE
Okay – so what does all this mean to you? This stakeholder group is a primary source of input regarding changes to theto the SPP and improvement activities to address federal indicators
What we hope to accomplish through this meeting • Stakeholders will be acquainted with the general structure and purposes of the SPP and APR • Stakeholders will participate in a review of the indicators with particular emphasis on improvement activities • Stakeholders will be prepared to go back to their organization and represent the SPP and APR • Stakeholders will be prepared to review new data in Spring 07 and provide comment and updates to data analysis and improvement activities for newly calculated Indicator values
In your groups, today, you will be given a summary derived from the SPP and APR. It contains the: • Indicator • Measurement • Baseline data • Target • Actual Target Data • Brief analysis • Improvement Activities • Today is a day to absorb as much as you can about the indicators that interest you.
Tomorrow • Evaluate improvement activities • What is working? • Where are the gaps? Holes? • What needs to be done to stimulate/support improvement • Policies, procedures, structures • Inservice training and professional development • Recruitment and retention of qualified staff
After Tomorrow • Information will be summarized for use in Spring Stakeholders Meeting • Spring Stakeholder meeting will look at data about the indicators derived from December 2006 data collections • LRE • Preschool LRE • Disproportionality • Eligibility Evaluation • Secondary Transition
