170 likes | 483 Views
Future Meat Inspection. Which parts of traditional meat inspection still relevant How to implement conclusions from the EFSA Report How do we address risks in a risk based approach Responsibilities > CAs and FBOs
E N D
Future Meat Inspection Which parts of traditional meat inspection still relevant How to implement conclusions from the EFSA Report How do we address risks in a risk based approach Responsibilities > CAs and FBOs WHO control WHAT? Official PM control include aesthetics and quality lesions HOW WHEN WHO is responsible for the different aspects of the PM control HOW and WHEN to address animal health and animal welfare Mid 2012 > COM supposed to present a proposal to amend rules on pig meat inspection
6 March 2012 Impact assessment on the revision of the HP by ordinary procedure TIMELINE • March 2012: Consultation IASG and SANCO hierarchy • 4 April 2012: submission to IA BOARD • 2 May 2012: board meeting • May-June 2012: interservice consultation on draft proposal for Regulations to European Parliament and Council with IA • Impact Assessment Board meeting >>> !! 4 July 2012 !! Board Endorsement >>>> it will be sent to the Council and Parliament + published (probably after summer break)
Policy options 1: Do nothing 2: Provide guidance 3: Amend by ordinary procedure: if legal certainty is important and the need for future amendments is considered low 4: Future amendments by delegated or implementing acts
Delegation of tasks meat inspection Which Options • Policy Option 1 – Do nothing • Policy Option 2 – Delegation by co-decision • Policy Option 3 – Delegation by future delegated acts Policy Option 3 > Delegation by Delegated Acts
Sheep and goats – 17/04/2012 FVE Expert: Frank O’Sullivan - Veterinary Ireland • Bovines – 25/05/2012 FVE Expert: Randi Stub Petersen - Danish Vet Association IT - Mr. Maurizio Ferri, Official Veterinarian -SIVEMP IE - Mr. Seamus Fagan - Veterinary Council DE - Mr. Thomas Ley - Germany - BundesverbandderbeamtetenTierärzte
Farmed game – 15/05/2012 FVE Expert: Mr. Edgar Wullinger, StateVeterinarian, hunter and recognized expert in farmed game meat inspection • Solipeds – 30/05/2012 FVE Expert: Mr. Romano Zilli
Sheep & Goats PARTICIPANTS • Copa-Cogeca • UECBV • FVE represented by Frank O’Sullivan
FVE • FCI = connect and manage food safety risks • Private practitioners and CAs can be more active throughout the FCI • FCI for FBOs method of adding value and integrate their farm suppliers • FCI = full expression to the EU "prevention is better than cure"
UECBV • FCI = unclear – Too general • PH risks at other steps (e.g. transport - retail) • Balance between FS/AH/AW & livestock production needed > impact the responsibility for cost attribution Copa-Cogeca • Strengthening FCI (farm level > voluntary quality systems - preferred to HACCP systems at primary production) • Consider slaughtering processes • Dressing operations (if carried out by the same worker) > NO increased microbiological risks
Bovines • CLITRAVI - UECBV - VION company Occupational Hazards not considered
- FCI > Optimising the flow and its content - FCI shall be linked to Herd Health Plans - Generalised bovine TBC > frequent condition for carcass condemnation • Some post mortem findings such as ketosis should be clarified • Environment protection policies consideration - Illicit sub. in bovine meat > almost half of all non compliances in meat samples from all species FVE could provide some data … UECBV • To consider hazards originating before-after the abattoir
Farmed game Topics Weak points of Reg. 853/2004 Outcomes - FCI to strengthen AM inspection. - Better check of farm records regularly and in details - Animals kept outdoors >> to be checked even by cutting (TB in deer) What is the cost of veterinary examinations ? There may be the danger of reducing the costs by saving staff and time.
Solipeds Topics • Production of solipeds and meat • FCI • Slaughter practices compared to other domestic ungulates • Main post-mortem inspection findings • Reasons for carcass condemnation • Laboratory chemical/microbiological testing Outcomes • FCI not duly filled in • Injured animals excluded or sampled • Mainly respiratory conditions • Welfare issues prevalent
Thank you! The next World Champions!