1 / 5

Conférence Redesigning public administration training to deal with the global development agenda

Conférence Redesigning public administration training to deal with the global development agenda SSPA, Rome 13-14 October 2008 Dr. Fabrice Larat Directeur du Centre d’Expertise et de Recherche Administrative, ENA «  Le système d’évaluation des performances

palti
Download Presentation

Conférence Redesigning public administration training to deal with the global development agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Conférence Redesigning public administration training to deal with the global development agenda SSPA, Rome 13-14 October 2008 Dr. Fabrice Larat Directeur du Centre d’Expertise et de Recherche Administrative, ENA « Le système d’évaluation des performances dans la formation initiale à l’ENA » Groupe de travail 2 « Benchmarking and evaluation in civil service training »

  2. Performance evaluation and quality control of training programmes on public administration • Benchmarking: how to measure performance and according to which criteria of referencecomment • Advantages and limits of self-centred versus external focused quality control processes • How does the system of quality control of the ENA’s main training activities works?

  3. The four points of orientation available for performance evaluation in public administration training Opinion of the ultimate benificiaries of the training programme Self-centred evaluation Future employers External oriented evaluation Opinion of the direcft benificiaries of the training programme Training programme Trainees Teaching staff Opinion of the persons in charge of teaching Best practices What is done outside in similar programmes Essential The evaluation strategy to adopt in the training programme must be chosen in accordance with the own priorities and objectives of the programme and depending on the of the institute or school that performe it!

  4. Three main steps of the evaluation process a) Collecting Information • Available and accessible data • Reliability and representiveness • Comparability b) Data Analyse • Combining different kinds of data in order to make a contradictory analysis • Taking the context into account • The assessment of performance must be coherent with regard to the programme’s objectives c) Reaction (= Undertaking necessary measure to improve quality)‏ Les mesures d’adaptation prises doivent être… • Relevant • Appropriate • Efficient • Justified

  5. Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Monitoring during programme duration Evaluation a posteriori Programme adapatation Student interviews** Feed back from student associations * Evaluation questionnaires** Report from the stage supervisor Employers survey* Feedback from alumni* Overall organisation of the curriculum Content of the different courses + pedagogical instruments Teaching staff Internships Feed back from the teaching staff Concours Sta r t End Stages Quality control system for main training programme at ENA Legend: Source of information = trainees Source of information = teaching staff Source of information = Employers * Collecte d’information ponctuelle ** Collecte d’information systématique Bilans personnalisés **

More Related