210 likes | 377 Views
Westlake City School District We Educate for Excellence... 20/20 Vision Committee October 7, 2009. Overview of 20/20 Process. Facility Focus Group. Mike Bilardo , Hyland Software Jim Connole , City Council
E N D
Westlake City School DistrictWe Educate for Excellence...20/20 Vision CommitteeOctober 7, 2009
Overview of 20/20 Process Facility Focus Group Mike Bilardo, Hyland Software Jim Connole, City Council Nate Cross, City Planning Commission Mark Doran, Energizer, Inc. Dan Keenan, Westlake City Schools Chris Milowicki, CJ Tom Builders Mark Pepera, Westlake City Schools Dave Puffer, Westlake City Schools Nancy Schill, Schill Architecture Steve Schill, Schill Architecture Steve Steffas, C.B. Richard Ellis Property Management
Overview of 20/20 Process Facility Focus Group – Findings and Recommendations • A real problem exists that needs immediate attention • Demonstrate care and pride in facilities by making positive changes with existing budget and maintaining the right way • Move forward on engaging the entire community • Conduct community forums to inform and seek input • Establish a 20/20 Vision Committee to develop a plan using data and community input • Include a long term maintenance plan • Have a facility plan that reflects the community’s values • Do the job well, on budget, and plan maintenance
Vision 20/20 Committee Members The 24 member committee is multi-generational, represents public school and private school parents, those without children, civic leaders, business leaders, faculty and student representation: Overview of 20/20 Process Harry Applegate Annette Caraulia Brian Gottfried Duane Miller Steve Schill Julie McCallister Del Younglis Jon Dregalla Bob Hertl Kim Mather Chris Milowicki Cathy Axcell Nancy Schill Mike Medoro Steve Steffas Dan Keenan Andrew Mangels Bonnie Smith Jeff Williams Melisa Yeoman Bill Baddour Mark Pepera Nate Cross Dave Puffer
Overview of 20/20 Process Summary of 20/20 Meetings • During the 6 meetings committee members: • Analyzed and requested various data • Prioritized plans • Discussed pros and challenges for each plan • Listed important areas that needed to be considered for facilities • Debated each plan with strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats • Everyone, including people with connections to the school and without, strongly agreed there was a problem that needed to be addressed responsibly and soon.
Overview of 20/20 Process Vision 20/20 Committee Master Plan Options
Building Assessments & Master Plan Options Bob McAuliffe Senior Manager, Hammond Construction OSFC - RPC (Regional Program Consultant) Todd Wrobleski, AIA, Principal-In-Charge MKC Associates, Inc. Architects - Engineers - Planners
Building Assessments & Master Plan Options Additional Option: Phasing, or “Segmenting” version of Vision Group Options #1 or #2
Building Assessments & Enrollment Projections Process • District request - to OSFC (Ohio School Facilities Commission) • OSFC assigns Regional Planning Coordinator • Appoints Pre-qualified Assessment Firm • CEFPI (Council of Educational Facility Planners Intl.) Standards • Student Enrollment Projections • District’s Architect/Engineering Firm and Regional Planning Coordinator review the assessment to assure accuracy
Building Assessments & Enrollment Projections Enrollment & Inflation Data OSFC Enrollment Projection % OSDM* Construction Inflation Rate Construction Cost Inflation 1999 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 % *Ohio School Design Manual
Building Assessments Rating: #1 = Satisfactory #2 = Needs Repair #3 = Needs Replacement *Based on 2009 OSFC Cost Set
Building Assessments Renovate/Replace % compares cost of assessment-based renovation to new construction costof the same-sizedbuilding Does not include cost of additional space required to serve the number of students (by OSFC standards) in that building
Building Assessments * meeting OSFC Standards - renovate to assessments and SF/Student standards to
Building Assessments - Master Plan Options - Recap Master Plan Recap Does Not include LFI’s (Locally Funded Initiatives)
Process Going Forward Steve Miller Educational Facility Planner MKC Associates, Inc. Architects - Engineers - Planners
Process Going Forward Staff Engagement: Discussion of Master Plan Options #1 and #2
Break-Out Session Steve Miller Educational Facility Planner MKC Associates, Inc. Architects - Engineers - Planners
Break-Out Session We have scheduled informative presentations to include: • Scope and Budget • Educational Considerations • Operating Issues • Site Considerations • Co Curricular Considerations • Funding Options What other information do you need to select a Master Plan?
Thank You !www.wlake.orgNext Meeting: October 21st Westlake City School DistrictWe Educate for Excellence...