1 / 10

Clive Morris Research Group

Clive Morris Research Group. Health Services Research Association Australia & New Zealand. Grant Application Cycle. Schemes close. Applications assigned. Peer Review. Initial assessment (primary spokesperson & external assessors). Applicant response. Peer Review by Grant Review Panel.

pascale-frank
Download Presentation

Clive Morris Research Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clive MorrisResearch Group Health Services Research Association Australia & New Zealand

  2. Grant Application Cycle Schemes close Applications assigned Peer Review Initial assessment (primary spokesperson & external assessors) Applicant response Peer Review by Grant Review Panel Approval Processes Announcement by Minister Applicants notified of Funding Scheme outcomes

  3. Background: Assessment Criteria & Scoring Categories • Scientific Quality (50%) • Significance and/or Innovation (25%) • Track Record – relative to opportunity (25%) • 7 – Outstanding by International Standards • 6 – Excellent • 5 – Very Good • 4 – Good • 3 – Marginal • 2 – Unsatisfactory • 1 – Poor

  4. Clarity of Purpose and Readability • Setting the scene: general pointers • Read the funding rules (check for eligibility issues) • Read the selection criteria carefully and address those in your application • CV & Profile up to date (in RGMS) • Know your audience

  5. Significance and/or Innovation • Novelty • What is novel about your research? • Significance • How significant is the proposed study? • How will it make a difference and can you demonstrate this?

  6. Research Goals & Feasibility • Ambitious goals • Feasibility considerations

  7. Track Record and Progress Reports • Track Record considerations: • Include well constructed progress reports on previous grants • Track record is considered “relative to opportunity” • International benchmarking

  8. Applicant Response • Use the opportunity to respond, even if the review is positive • Keep your response professional

  9. Summary • Use every opportunity throughout the review process to demonstrate why your proposal should be funded • The application • Assessor reports • Applicant response GOOD LUCK !

  10. Questions? 16 Marcus Clarke St Canberra City ACT 2600 GPO Box 1421 CANBERRA ACT 2601

More Related