140 likes | 306 Views
Evidence-based policy: myth or reality?. Dylan Winder Central Research Department DFID. DFID Overview. 3 White Papers since 1997 Development Act Budget Increase to reach 0.7% GNI by 2013 Current Budget £4.5bn this year, £5.6 bn next More than 40 Country Offices International/Multilateral
E N D
Evidence-based policy: myth or reality? Dylan Winder Central Research Department DFID
DFID Overview • 3 White Papers since 1997 • Development Act • Budget Increase to reach 0.7% GNI by 2013 • Current Budget £4.5bn this year, £5.6 bn next • More than 40 Country Offices • International/Multilateral • Policy • Staffing • Aid Effectiveness • Communication
The DFID “policy” Environment • Whitehall: science in Government • DFID: our processes • DFID PRD • DFID Country Offices • Reforming the international system • Networks, relationships, opportunity, politics and power
A Case Study: DFID Science and Research.Pre-History • Surr Report – outcomes not sectors • Inherited old research (£75 million committed to 2005) • CRT formed April 2003 as part of PD – think tank versus public good • Needed decisions from SoS by Christmas
Primeval Soup or big ideas? • Web consultation – 600 +submissions (95% uk academics) • Technical meetings: Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; DSA; TAA • 6 Background Papers • Donor consultation (IDRC, Rockefeller) • HoPs and advisory groups • OSI
Divine intervention? • Sir David King • UK lobby groups • Lack of evaluation of previous programmes • Publication of RFF • Science Select Committee • Implementation: models, Cap building, Comms, M&E
Room for improvement • Principles were right • Developing country consultation • Mapping against existing strategy (international, regional and national) • DFID-wide ownership and consultation – delivering WP and S&I strategy • Evaluation of past/current? • Positive feedback/ownership from UK • Big ideas • Donor co-ordination • Sir Gordon
How we do it in CRD (is our evidence used?) Modalities • Commission bilateral research (Research Programme Consortia, etc.) • Contribute to Multilaterals (core and extra budgetary) • Product Development Partnerships (PPPs) • Regional Programmes • Collaborative programmes managed by partners (UK Research Councils) • Joint-donor and multi-donor (IDRC, PERI, etc.) Process • Communication of research • International Influencing/co-ordination (including cross-Whitehall) • Capacity building of Southern research institutes, researchers, and communication environment • Monitoring, evaluation and learning
Partnerships and Influencing Providing leadership and credibility through quality and volume with effective, efficient and impacting programmes Leveraging and influencing • Multilaterals • Whitehall • Research Councils UK • Private sector • Foundations Empowering • Developing country research institutions
Suatainable Agriculture • 4 key components • Funding through multilateral routes (CGIAR, IARCs, Challenge Programmes etc) • Regional research programmes • Facility to take forward RNRRS achievements • Responsive programme with UK-based Research Councils – linked to more applied research in Southern-based institutions Mile a minute
Make research relevant & accessible Strengthen the context to use research Getting research used (as evidence) • collaboration with international organisations • advocacy with other international/regional research organisations • Learning • Capacity development • communication strategies in research programmes • minimum 10% budget for communication • Guidance Notes and Advisory support • Research4Development • Communications projects
Future • Responding to the White Paper 3 priorities • Science and Innovation Strategy • Building a revised funding framework that doubles CRD spend • Getting a 20 year vision • Working in a more joined up way • Building capacity • Better use of research in policy decisions: The reality…..