260 likes | 648 Views
Aboriginal Rights. Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982:The existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recognized and affirmedVan der Peet TestIn order to be an Aboriginal right an activity must be an element of a practice, custom or tradition integral to the distinctive culture of the Aboriginal group claiming the right.
E N D
1. Community Considerations for Indigenous Knowledgeby Darwin Hanna of Callison & Hanna, Barristers & Solicitors3945 W. 51st Avenue, Vancouver, B.C. V6N 4C5Tel. 604-222-2374Fax 604-2374Email: darwin@chlaw.ca
2. Aboriginal Rights Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982:
The existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recognized and affirmed
Van der Peet Test
In order to be an Aboriginal right an activity must be an element of a practice, custom or tradition integral to the distinctive culture of the Aboriginal group claiming the right
3. Van der Peet & Delgamuukw
rights and title may be established through oral history evidence.
courts must “come to terms with oral histories of aboriginal societies”.
A court must take into account the perspective of the aboriginal people claiming the right.
aboriginal rights demand a unique approach to the treatment of evidence which accords due weight to the perspective of Aboriginal peoples.
courts must approach the rules of evidence in light of the evidentiary difficulties inherent in adjudicating aboriginal claims and must interpret that evidence in the same spirit.
To adapt the laws of evidence in order that oral histories as proof of historical facts can be accommodated and placed on an equal footing with the types of historical evidence the courts are familiar with.
4. Consultations Government and industry have a duty to provide full information to First Nation regarding proposed activity, development or decision
Seek information from Aboriginal group about the impact a decision or action may have on the rights or interests of a First Nation
Government and industry has a duty to fully inform itself on the practices of the Aboriginal group
Avoid or minimize infringement
Substantially address concerns
Accommodate economic interests
5. Taku River Tlinglit 2002 BCCA Taku River Tlinglit expressed their concerns regarding the proposed re-opening of a mine in terms of
Sustainability as a people
Interference with their asserted aboriginal rights
Systematic nature of the Tlinglit’s land use practices
Reliance on land use system for sustenance
6. Taku River Tlinglit and Haida Nation 2002 BCCA Government and industry have a fiduciary duty to consult before there is determination that the First Nation has existing aboriginal rights
Government and industry have a legally enforceable duty to consult with aboriginal people in good faith and to seek workable accommodations between aboriginal interests and the public interest, both aboriginal and non-aboriginal.
7. Taku River Tlinglit and Haida Nation Accommodation of concerns and economic objectives of aboriginal people
Accommodation may be achieved through
Amendment to plans
addition of conditions to an activity;
Creation of employment opportunities;
Sharing of economic opportunities; and
Opportunities for sub-contracting
8. Community determines outcome Assert community and economic interest to lands and resources
Support development with accommodation of interests
Take steps to honour way of life
9. Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada v. Charles Benoit et al 2003 FCA 236 Trial Decision:
Treaty 8 included promise of no tax
Dene and Cree people believed that Canada promised a tax exemption
Decision based on the following evidence at trial: 1899 Commissioners’ Report, viva voce (oral evidence) of 3 witnesses, and an interview transcript
Appeal Issue: Crown submitted that no weight should be afforded to Aboriginal oral evidence and that the Judge ignored contrary evidence
Decision: evidence adduced at trial cannot support the conclusion
10. Judge wrongly excluded TARR Interviews: over 100 elders interviewed did not refer to taxation
Judge erred by not considering:
Oral History Interviews (1991 & 1999)
29 of 30 elders interviewed in the Cree language 1991 did not mention tax promise
elders interviewed by an anthropologist in 1999
Bishop Breynat Affidavits from 1930’s – 49 affidavits - no mention of tax promise
Father Fumoleau Book (1973) - no reference to tax promise
Special Joint Committee Hearing (1946-8) to Review Indian Act - no submissions by Treaty 8 beneficiaries respecting Treaty tax exemption
Trial Judge accepted one TARR translated interview (1972 &1975)
Crown argued interview “rambling, repetitive and far from definitive” [para. 60] and agreed by judge
Did not say beneficiaries given a blanket exemption
Testimony at Trial – Viva Voce Evidence
1. elder – contradictory
Evidence characterized as “sparse, doubtful and equivocal” – “not deserving any weight” [para. 69]
2. member - “equivocal and inconclusive” [para. 73]
does not meet community standard as elder
3. elder - unswown affidavit – words of drafter not deponent
evidence “sparse, doubtful and equivocal” [para. 98]
11. Stone J.A. quoted a Crown anthropologist regarding the weight of oral history evidence
“oral history evidence cannot be accepted, per se, as factual, unless it has undergone the critical scrutiny that courts and experts, whether they may be historians, archaeologist, social scientists, apply to the various types of evidence which they have to deal with”
“depending on the nature of the oral history at issue, corroboration may well be necessary to render it reliable”
12. Testimony of Knowledge Keepers Holders of Indigenous Knowledge may be questioned about the reliability of their knowledge:
“… inquiries as to the witnes’s ability to know and testify to orally transmitted aboriginal traditions and history may be appropriate both on the question of admissibility and the weight to be assigned the evidence if admitted”: Mitchell v. M.N.R. [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911 at para. 33
13. Researching Oral History Be strategic and respectful
Research
provides insight into relationships
extends the boundaries of existing knowledge
Research can correct false or incorrect knowledge
14. Research Considerations Purpose
Consent and Confidentiality
Methodology
Translation and Transcription
Copyright.
15. Copyright Issues Copyright Act: rights & obligations
Sole right of the copyright owner to reproduce or distribute in any material form, broadcast or perform any original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work.
Protects the form ideas or concepts are expressed in
Requirement: originality & fixed
Original Work:
originate from author
Product of labour & skill
Expression of thoughts
Fixation:
Material form
Capable of identification
Permanent endurance
Profit and control work
Right to publish or prohibit others
Term:
Author’s life plus 50 years
Expiration -> public domain
16. Oral Knowledge & Copyright Can stories be protected by Copyright?
Must be original & fixed
Creation story: storytellers version stresses, develops, deletes or modifies parts of story
Stories are not protected unless fixed (i.e. taped, transcribed, written, translated)
Multi-layers of copyright: storyteller, translator, transcriber, editor, compiler
17. Solutions to Copyright Protocol/Terms of Reference
Agreement
Release
Assignment
Informants retain copyright by agreement
Held in Trust by Community
Permitted and authorized uses
18. Informed Consent Research Guidelines to obtain consent from informants:
Informed consent be obtained
Consent should be in writing
Provide information about research
No pressure applied
Free to withdraw
Informed of the degree of confidentiality
19. Confidentiality Agreement & Policy Interview information will be kept confidential
informants will be the copyright holders
interview materials will be held in trust
Informant is to receive copy of tape and transcript
The interview information is for only specific purposes
method for the informant to revoke their consent
not publish, disclose or release interview information without the prior written approval on the informant
20. ABORIGINAL ORAL HISTORY:
continue to be vibrant
maintain a record
legal acceptance
used for many purposes
research considerations
21. Types of Oral History oral traditions of the community
those oral traditions collected, translated transcribed, and published since contact.
23. STORIES communicate aspects of the culture
socialize people into a cultural tradition
validate hereditary claims to authority, prestige, lands & resources
provide Information to undertake activities and practices
provide entertainment
24. Uses of Oral History Constitution
self-government
service organization
community plans, disputes, processes
business endeavours
specific land claims
Consultations
school cases
aboriginal rights & title
co-management
25. Stories provide: knowledge of the past
An understanding about the origin of life
instruction on beliefs, morals, and philosophy
understanding for current events
education