Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC

1. Policy Development in RIPE & the RIPE NCC Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC

2. Overview • RIPE • in the global context • RIPE NCC • in the global context • Policy development • how can you participate • IPv4 & IPv6 Allocation Policies

3. What is RIPE? • Reseaux IP Européens (1989) • collaborative organisation of ISPs • open to all interested parties • voluntary participation, no fees • works by consensus • encourages face-to-face discussion • “interest group” for Internet community in ‘Europe’

4. RIPE Meeting attendees for 1998 Total: 669

5. Global Context • World-wide Internet • Technical Development & Standards Body • World-wide Operators Forum • EU Operators USA Operators • Asian Operators IETF IEPG NANOG RIPE APRICOT

6. What is the RIPE NCC? • Co-ordination and support services for ISPs • Not-for-profit association under Dutch law • formal membership, Executive Board , yearly fee • 7 years of history • 1500+ members (mainly ISPs, but open to anyone)

7. RIPE NCC Membership

8. Why an NCC ? • Support for RIPE/ISP community • Activities need continuity • Database ... • Neutrality and impartiality important • to ensure fair distribution of resources • neutral ground for ISPs to co-ordinate technical & administrative issues

9. RIPE NCC Activities • Registration Services • IPv4 & IPv6 address & AS number allocation • Reverse delegation • Co-ordination & Liaison • RIPE database maintenance • Technical Projects • Information Dissemination & Education

10. Activity Development Process RIPE Working Groups • define requirements, suggest activities RIPE NCC Staff • produces activity plan & budget RIPE NCC Executive Board • submits to membership RIPE NCC Membership • approves and sets fees

11. Global Policy Development • Developed in open policy meetings • Implemented by Regional Internet Registries • Co-ordinated among RIRs

12. RIPE NCC in Global Context Ultimate global numbers authority Sets policy and criteria for Regional Registries Regional Registries: Policies and criteria aligned but differences in local implementation IANA/ICANN RIPE NCC ARIN APNIC RIPE ARIN Mtg APRICOT

13. Policy Development in RIPE • Developed in RIPE LIR-WG • open-open-open • Implemented by RIPE NCC • open; controlled by membership

14. Policy Development Process • Policy (changes) can be suggested by • Members/Local IRs • RIPE NCC • Public at large • Policy must be • fair to all • ‘good’ for the Internet • consistent with global policies

15. How Can You Participate • RIPE Working Groups • LIR-WG • Open Mailing Lists • <majordomo@ripe.net> • Public Meetings • next meeting in Amsterdam February 1999 • RIPE NCC membership • AGM http://www.ripe./net/meetings

16. IPv4 Facts & Information

17. IPv4 Allocation Policies • RIPE NCC Member • Initial allocation: /19 • Next allocation based on usage rate • Support and Training to ensure fair distribution

18. IANA Allocations • 192.x.y.z: 1992/1993 • 193/8: Sep. 1993 • 194/8: Sep. 1993 • 195/8: Mar. 1994 • 62/8: Apr. 1995 • 212/8 Jan. 1998 • 213/8: May 1999 • B’s: 1993 (last assigned from in 1996)

19. Address Space Usage

20. Address Space Usage APNIC

21. RIPE NCC Allocations • 1,500 Members • mainly ISPs • also Telcos, Gov., Associations, Academic • Initial allocation: /19 • Next allocation based on usage rate • Support and Training to ensure fair distribution • 85 Countries

22. Service Regions of the Registries ARIN RIPE NCC APNIC

23. 1,5 New Members a Day

24. RIPE NCC Charging Model • 3 Categories • pre-1997: self-determined • now based on allocations and aging 2000 (prelim.) 1999 1998 Small 2400 2650 2450 Medium 3350 3700 3400 Large 4400 4900 4500 Sign-up 2100 2100 2000

25. LIR Charging Model • RIPE Community agreement • Service charge • no per-address charge • See ‘Charging by Local Internet Registries’ • Authors: RIPE NCC & LIR-WG chair http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-152.html

26. IPv6 Information & Experiences

27. IPv6 Allocation Policies Peering with 3  subTLAs AND either Plan to provide IPv6 services within 12 months OR  40 SLA customers

28. IPv6 Allocation Policies(Bootstrap Phase) Peering with 3  ASes AND Plan to provide IPv6 services within 12 months AND either  40 IPv4 customers OR 6bone experience

29. IPv6 Allocations • Initial Allocation: /35 subTLA • Entire /29 reserved (aggregatable) • APNIC: 3 sub-TLAs allocated • ARIN: 2 subTLAs allocated • RIPE NCC: 6 subTLAs allocated

30. IANA Allocations • APNIC: 2001:0200::/23 • ARIN: 2001:0400::/23 • RIPE NCC: 2001:0600::/23

31. Database Object • inet6num: 2001:0600::/23 netname: RIPE-NCC descr: RIPE Network Co-ordination Centre descr: Amsterdam, Netherlands country: NL admin-c: NN44-RIPE tech-c: MK16-RIPE status: ASSIGNED PA mnt-by: LIR-MNT changed: hostmaster@ripe.net 19990820 source: RIPE

32. TLA/NLA/SLA Relationship • NLA & SLA database registration • Review before next TLA allocation • No additional charges for IPv6 in 1999/2000 • Part of existing charging scheme in 2001 • review by membership

33. Open Issues • Multihoming • IETF IPng WG • Current solution: multiple SLAs • Renumbering • outside the IP layer

34. ASO & ICANN

35. Global Aspects • All addresses are global • Co-ordination among RIRs and IANA • Dependent on topology • one backbone? • Local connection? • IANA does not allocate addresses directly

36. Interaction with other Technologies • Difference to dynamic dial-up? • addresses don’t move, user moves • Co-operation with Telco Operators and ETSI • started • continue in the future

37. Pointers & References • RIPE Meetings http://www.ripe.net/meetings/ripe/index.html • IPv4 Allocation Policies http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-185.html • IPv6 Allocation Policies http://www.ripe.net/lir/registries/ipv6.html • Presentation http://www.ripe.net/meetings/pres/index.html

38. QUESTIONS? http://www.ripe.net