230 likes | 457 Views
H.P. Marshall Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Univ. of Colorado Gary Koh, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab, New Hampshire Rick Forster, Department of Geography, University of Utah. Ground-Based FMCW radar measurements: a summary of the NASA CLPX data. Br ief FMCW Theory I.
E N D
H.P. Marshall Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Univ. of Colorado Gary Koh, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab, New Hampshire Rick Forster, Department of Geography, University of Utah Ground-Based FMCW radar measurements: a summary of the NASA CLPX data
Linear frequency chirp transmitted (T) Received signal (R) “mixed” with transmitted wave before signal acquisition Recorded signal contains the sum and difference frequencies from T + R Frequency differences from reflectors linearly related to the distance to target Brief FMCW Theory II
Windowed FFT, zero-padded, normalized by DC-coupling, power from surface calibration
Filter instrumentation-related signals • Locations where mean of signal > 5x mean deviation found • Mean trace at these depths subtracted from scan
Depth Calibration • Metal reflectors placed at known depths • Accurate depth scale, will also be used to calculate attenuation
LSOS Feb 19, 2002, C-Band: 2-6 GHz DRY SNOWPACK
LSOS Feb 19, 2002, X-Band: 8-12 GHz DRY SNOWPACK
LSOS Feb 19, 2002, Ku-Band: 14-18 GHz DRY SNOWPACK
LSOS March 26, 2002, C-Band: 2-6 GHz WET SNOWPACK
LSOS March 26, 2002, X-Band: 8-12 GHz WET SNOWPACK
LSOS March 26, 2002, Ku-Band: 14-18 GHz WET SNOWPACK
FMCW signal strongly related to in-situ dielectric measurements Resolution highest at Ku-Band, but little penetration if wet Incidence angle measurements indicate surface scattering dominates below ~15 deg and volume scattering above 30 Preliminary comparison with FMCW measurements at more narrow bandwidths encouraging Conclusions
Acknowledgements NASA Earth System Science Fellowship CRREL Kelly Elder, Don Cline Nate Mullheren