1 / 6

Doctrine/Lessons Learned : Breakout Session Out-Brief

Doctrine/Lessons Learned : Breakout Session Out-Brief. Facilitator : Alice Mulvehill (BBN). Outline. Working Group Name: Doctrine/LL Purpose Significant Issues Recommendations/Plan of Action. Some Common Goals. Use DAML to support user groups : Operations: Decision support Training

pepin
Download Presentation

Doctrine/Lessons Learned : Breakout Session Out-Brief

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Doctrine/Lessons Learned:Breakout Session Out-Brief Facilitator: Alice Mulvehill (BBN) Outline • Working Group Name: Doctrine/LL • Purpose • Significant Issues • Recommendations/Plan of Action

  2. Some Common Goals • Use DAML to support user groups: • Operations: Decision support • Training • Doctrine: Both producers and consumers • User Processes: • Information (doctrine/lessons) access • Auto-generation of valid/reliable structured information • Just-in-time information delivery (post approval/verification) • Across all levels (strategic, operational, tactical) • Tailored granularity (concept, task, mission) • Usable format • Constraints: • Portable: Does not require net connection • Tools must be easy to use, inexpensive to acquire

  3. Significant Issues/Needs • Process: • Tools for searching and inferencing with DAML ontologies • for context-sensitive search for given documents • for document revision and change tracking • for speeding up the markup process • Meta-tag generation • Identifying user’s granularity need (e.g., paragraph vs. task) • Approval of DAML links in doctrine generation • Bandwidth of existing info infrastructure systems, & search implications • Performance Tasks: • Representations for situation collection • Verification and editing • Trend analysis (e.g., from lessons, commonalities among METLs) • Comparative evaluations (e.g., search using DAML markup vs. not) • Product: • Provide portable/local search (e.g., not connected to SIPRNET) • Agent-based tools for exploiting DAMLized LL/doctrine • Meta-tag use

  4. Questions • Can PDF files (or their indices) be DAMLized (i.e., is HTML needed)? • 2. Any existing dataspace visualization tools for viewing DAML links? • If so, what are their existing capabilities?

  5. Recommendations/Plan of Action • Make requested DAML tools available • e.g., Ontology generators, auto-markup tools, DAML editors • Create inferencing tools for use with DAML markup • Advertise DAML tutorial (i.e., the walk-thru example) • Request DAML tool summary at next meeting • Build ontologies for METLs (DRC) • Demonstrate the utility of DAML for applying doctrine/LL in decision support systems (Several groups) • Provide PDF mission folder examples (with indices) for experimentation re: just-in-time index generation (C. McGrath) • Test ontology creation & markup tools (M. Dietvorst w/ D. Rager) • Provide intro descriptions & system requirements of available DAML tools (A. Mulvehill) • Provide feedback/assessments to Alice on DAML tools (all)

  6. David W. Aha Ted Baer Phillip Boos Sally DeGozzaldi Mike Dietvorst Kalyan Gupta Marti Hall Jake Jacobowitz Bob Lucas Chuck McGrath Chuck A. Menges Alice Mulvehill Bruce Peoples Mike Pratt David Rager Dennis Toomey Mark Werner Session Attendees

More Related