170 likes | 299 Views
TSU Education Reaccreditation. Importance, Tasks, Timeframe. Joyce S. Choate May 2, 2008. Reaccreditation. Improves programs to help all learners Benchmarks the unit against national standards Strengthens the unit esprit de corps Increases the profile of the unit
E N D
TSU Education Reaccreditation Importance, Tasks, Timeframe Joyce S. Choate May 2, 2008
Reaccreditation • Improves programs to help all learners • Benchmarks the unit against national standards • Strengthens the unit esprit de corps • Increases the profile of the unit • Professionalizes education • Provides faculty development opportunities • Meets state mandate Building honor & professional pride
Reaccreditation is not . . . • Easy • Quick • A Product • Optional
Reaccreditation is . . . • A Process • A Team Effort • A Monumental Project
The TSU Challenge TSU must complete the preparation process for reaccreditationin 9 months!!!
Reaccreditation Roles • The Dean governs • The NCATE Coordinator coordinates, facilitates, edits • The Steering Committee guides, advises • The Standards Chairs lead, write, document • The Faculty/Standards Committee Members collaborate, write, document • The Consultant coaches, aligns, paces
Meeting the Challenge • Mobilization: Your unit needs you NOW!Collaborative unit-wide team is essential! • Tireless Rapid Response Team • Weekly Steering Committee Meetings • Unit-Wide Weekly Work Sessions– Large Group Meeting•Information, Assignments (15 min.)•Group Concerns, Questions, Comments (15 min.) •Brief Progress & Need Reports by Standards Chairs (15 min.) – Break-Out Task Sessions by Standard (1 hr.)– Standards Report to Large Group (5 min.) • Establish schedule & clear calendars now•Weekly meetings •Nov. 9-11 Mock •Mar. 21-25, 2009 NCATE Every unit member a rapid response team member
Urgent Needs to Meet the Challenge • Tireless Rapid Response Team, mobilized • Conceptual Framework fully developed/approvedSpecific KSDs should define expectations & performance data • Data, Data, Data, and the Unit Assessment System operationalLocate data to enter in system, enter, review for improvements • Written responses to IR template with supporting exhibitsUse exhibits to answer questions, questions to build exhibits • Program RevisionsRevise to meet standards & for data-based improvements • Remediation of 2001 NCATE WeaknessesField placements, offices, governance, communication, policies It takes the whole village (unit) . . . to meet and prove high standards
Task Timelines: MAY • Mobilize the Unit: ALL must address urgent needs now • Finalize & approve the Conceptual Framework • Complete description of the Unit Assessment System–Everyone locate DATA, submit to Standard 2 • Begin writing & documenting –Standards chairs assign committee writing assignments– Sketch answers to IR template questions for assigned writing– Locate/develop/mine exhibits to support writing assignments • Review programs for needed revisions • Rectify documented weaknesses:•field placements •offices •communication •policies & procedures Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: JUNE • Review every program • Identify/propose needed adjustments • Review IR template sketched answers & standards– Decide what answers should be– Identify needed support (exhibits)– Identify any changes that would improve answers– Identify any policies & procedures that need formalizing– Make it all so! • Relate data to Conceptual Framework KSDs Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: JULY • All data into Unit Assessment System– Analyzed, analyzed, disseminated– Reviewed by chairs, coordinators, Assessment Committee– Data-based improvements made and documented • All syllabi updated, submitted • All program changes made, described in writing, published–Everyone locate DATA, submit to Standard 2 • Draft of Unit Policies & Procedures Handbook–Reviewed by faculty & administrators– Approved with modifications • Standards committees fill in sketched IR answers & exhibits Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: AUGUST • Unit data & data-based improvements reviewed • State program reports completed; program performances compared • IR rough draft completed, reviewed for consistency/edits • Exhibit rough drafts completed, reviewed/edited • Website updated Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: SEPTEMBER • Mock draft of IR completed 9/15, edited • Mock draft of Exhibits completed 9/25 • Team work room/exhibit room set up Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: OCTOBER • Mock IR dressed and published (10/15) • Mock exhibits dressed and published (10/30) • IR & exhibits posted on password-protected website (10/31) • IR, CF, UAS hard copies mailed to mock team Every unit member a rapid response team member
Task Timelines: NOVEMBER • Prepare for mock visit November 9-11, 2008 • Identify, schedule, prepare interviewees • Review mock report (11/19) • Develop action plan Every unit member a prepared team member
Ongoing Task for TSU Team Identify TSU Highlights [Highlight: Something the unit does particularly well related to a specific standard] Every unit member a proud team member
The TSU Challenge Only YOU can ensure that the TSU preparation over the next 9 months is productive, constructive, and results in successful reaccreditation!!! Let’s roll . . . !