1 / 12

HPV Route Assessment The South Australian Experience

HPV Route Assessment The South Australian Experience. John Olson Managing Director HDS Australia Pty Ltd. Outline. DTEI Route Assessment Guidelines Role of the Authorised Route Assessor Issues. Role of the Authorised Route Assessor. Engaged by Applicant (not DTEI/Council)

Download Presentation

HPV Route Assessment The South Australian Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HPV Route AssessmentThe South Australian Experience John OlsonManaging DirectorHDS Australia Pty Ltd

  2. Outline • DTEI Route Assessment Guidelines • Role of the Authorised Route Assessor • Issues

  3. Role of the Authorised Route Assessor • Engaged by Applicant (not DTEI/Council) • Obtain statistical data and records relevant to the assessment from DTEI, incl: • previous assessments • traffic counts • crash history • road drawings • Conduct the route assessment, determining impact of the RAV operating along a proposed route in terms of: • effect on amenity, environment and impact on local communities • ability of proposed RAV to be physically and safely accommodated along route • Identify/assess risks using risk assessment model, then categorise as P1 (very high risk), P2 (high risk), P3 (moderate risk) and P4 (low risk) • Prepare Route Assessment Report and Recommendations,including management of risks (accept, treat, transfer, avoid) • Submit report to Applicant

  4. Technical and Physical Criteria Assessment • Connections with existing Gazette Route • Traffic volumes • Road width • Township roads • Overtaking provision • Overtaking sight distance • Low speed off tracking and intersection design • Pavements and road surfaces • Bridges and structures • Railway level crossings • Height clearance • Crash statistics, highlighting “hot spots” • Traffic counts • Speed environment • Adjacent land use / planning zones • Other vehicle types

  5. Issues • Applicant costs – “user pays” principle: • Initial application to DTEI • Authorised Route Assessor fee • Route upgrade requirements !! (may be shared with DTEI / Council) • First user disadvantaged • PBS requirements too severe – risk assessment and management process (e.g. for low volume routes) • Lack of appropriate tools (e.g. turning path software) to test routes for PBS vehicles, particularly L2, L3 and L4 • Operators running RAV’s illegally • Old gazetted routes not suitable for newer heavy vehicles • PBS take up in SA is low – only two types, including Heavy Mineral Concentrate (HMC) Triple Road Train (L3) in use throughCeduna to Thevenard Port Facility by Iluka Resources.

  6. HPV Route AssessmentThe South Australian Experience Thank You Questions during Panel Discussion

More Related