1 / 8

FACULTY GOVERNANCE SURVEY

FACULTY GOVERNANCE SURVEY. James Lollar , Radford University Consultant. Response Rates. N = 143 CAS – 106 COB - 10 COE – 11 Not given - 16 Full: 42% Associate : 38% Assistant: 16%. General Findings. Survey confirmed the focus group data

phiala
Download Presentation

FACULTY GOVERNANCE SURVEY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FACULTY GOVERNANCE SURVEY James Lollar, Radford University Consultant

  2. Response Rates • N = 143 • CAS – 106 • COB - 10 • COE – 11 • Not given - 16 • Full: 42% Associate : 38% Assistant: 16%

  3. General Findings • Survey confirmed the focus group data • Problems of current system – redundancy, too many committees, bad communication, not enough impact on decisions made • Wide agree /disagree on questions re: whether handled by college or university • People are discontented, and open to changing governance – but how?

  4. Specific Questions • Since the UFC was introduced, has your level of awareness of faculty governance issues: • Increased 20% • Decreased 36% • Stayed the same 43% • Does CAS have too much influence? • 59% disagree

  5. UFC composition • Would you support alternative representation on the UFC? • 25% yes • 26% no • 40% unsure (would depend on what)

  6. University Faculty Senate? • Would you favor replacing the UFC with at UFS that includes a senator from each academic department? • Favor 54% • Not favor 20% • Unsure 20% • Why not? Would be too big, too unwieldy, small colleges would lose power

  7. Chairs on UFC? • Would you support having the chairs as part of the UFC? • No one favored this

  8. Overall • Support for a larger UFC • Colleges represented but not by department • More at large individuals • Proportional “Doesn’t matter how you structure it – just let administration do our job!”

More Related