1 / 12

Kingdom Of Cambodia Ministry Of Education, Youth and Sport

Joint Approaches to Capacity Development : Reflections and Analysis Presentation by H.E. Pok ThanSecretary of State, MOEYS and M. Ratcliffe, Consultant LENCD Forum, Nairobi, October 3 - 5, 2006. Kingdom Of Cambodia Ministry Of Education, Youth and Sport.

pier
Download Presentation

Kingdom Of Cambodia Ministry Of Education, Youth and Sport

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Approaches to Capacity Development : Reflections and Analysis Presentation by H.E. Pok ThanSecretary of State, MOEYS and M. Ratcliffe, Consultant LENCD Forum, Nairobi, October 3 - 5, 2006 Kingdom Of CambodiaMinistry Of Education, Youth and Sport

  2. Development Transition : Three Phases • 1979 - 1993 :System Restoration. CD driven by community demand to restore schools • 1994 - 1999 :Donor-led Reconstruction. CD impetus from donors priorities, mainly teacher training • 2000 - 2005 :Development Partnership. CD impetus from disappointing sector performance and joint CD action matrix

  3. Main Features : 1979 - 1993 • Joint approach, through small MOEYS team and community groups • Donors hands-off, Eastern bloc presence not primarily developmental • Informal, iterative planning, due to unpredictable, voluntary, sector financing • CD focus, learning by doing and little formal training • Monitoring / Accountability, through politically-oriented National Education Congress

  4. Main Features : 1994 - 1999 • Joint approach, attempted through education investment plan 1994 / 99, with management targets • Donors dominated, through selective cooperation on specific CD programs • CD planning tensions, between previous informal approaches and growing formality demanded by donors • CD focus, mainly staff training and logistical support, limited organizational development • Monitoring / Accountability, through parallel systems, through NEC for MOEYS and project monitoring for donors

  5. Mixed CD Impact : 1994 - 1999 • Growing MOEYS confidence, through strong Ministerial leadership and some donor trust • Selective organizational development focus, especially for textbooks and teacher training services • Limited ownership of CD framework, targets and strategies not fully internalized or committed to • Unclear institutional framework, with MOEYS powers and organizational structure not fully approved • Donor territorialism, undermined mutual trust and confidence in joint approach • Capacity draining, due to proliferation of parallel PIUs

  6. Main Features : 2000 - 2005 • Joint approach, through ESP / ESSP, with stated CD targets and timeframes • Genuine partnership, based on growing shared commitment and mutual trust • Patient CD planning process, took two years to ensure sufficient CD assessment and understanding • CD focus, shift to key MOEYS organizational assessment and plans • Monitoring / Accountability, through joint CD policy action matrix and annual ESP / ESSP review process

  7. Improving CD Impact : 2000 - 2005 • Significant legislative and regulatory development, incorporating MOEF support • Improved organizational efficiency, especially planning, information, personnel and financial management • Substantial sector performance improvement, acting as confidence booster and change dynamic • Stronger MOEYS strategic and organizational leadership, with TA role shifting to mentoring and coaching • Promising CD sustainability, with growing internal and external demand and increased MOEYS resource allocations • Improving sector performance, acted as self reinforcing change dynamic

  8. Sector Performance Impact, 2000/05 Baseline 2000 = 100, table shows percentage change

  9. Organizational Assessment, 2005 : Information Department Ratings : 1 = virtually non existent, 3 = operating with difficulties, 5 = operating very well

  10. Key Lessons Learned • High level leadership is critical, including sustained MOEF support • A well-defined policy and institutional framework is vital • An inclusive SWAp type process can help, including formal donor signing up • Patient CD planning is essential

  11. Key Lessons Learned, Cont... • CD implementation must be phased, to avoid system overload • Harmonizing internal and external CD monitoring / accountability needs to be recognized • Frontloaded TA for sector planning helps CD roadmap development • Policy / strategy TA role and expected outcomes need to be defined carefully

  12. Outlook • Sustainability of joint approach is likely but potential risks remain • Implementation of education law and regulations are critical for CD sustainability • Lack of confidence and qualified staff at sub-national level constitutes major risk • Greater monitoring of organizational outcomes needed to provide feedback on next phase of CD planning / implementation

More Related