420 likes | 674 Views
General Overview Power Plant Information System “KISSY“. Dipl.-Ing. Werner Hartwig 11th September 2008. Basics and Purpose. Basics Definitions for Performance Indicators like forced outage rate Purpose
E N D
General OverviewPower Plant Information System “KISSY“ Dipl.-Ing. Werner Hartwig 11th September 2008
Basics and Purpose • Basics Definitions for Performance Indicators like forced outage rate • Purpose Providing a System enabling to a Tool for analysing the Performance for developing a better Operation Regime
11.09.2008 Performance & Monitoring Losses in Energy Conversion • avoidable losses, influenced by technical devices • - non avoidable losses, not influenced by technical devices • heat efficiency fed • with fuel in KJ/s • usable net electrical • output in KW • - heat efficiency in • KJ/s removed with • cooling water • - other losses in KJ/s
11.09.2008 Performance & Monitoring Sankey Diagram of Individual Losses
Power Plant Information System KISSY VGB EURELECTRIC WEC FP: AT, CH, DENP: CH,DE,ES,FI,NL FP: Europe, Israel,South-Africa(16 Countries) FP 49 Countries NP 32 Countries RE 14 Countries DE EU Exploitation: VGB Exploitation: VGB Exploitation VGB ReportAvailability of Thermal Power Plants(annual) EURELECTRIC/VGB-ReportTHERPERF(annual) WEC-ReportPerformance ofGeneration Plant (every 3 Years) VGB ReportAnalysis of Unavailability(annual) Data collection and evaluation by VGB FP: Fossil-fired Power PlantsNP: Nuclear Power PlantsRE: Renewable Power
EMSEreignis-Merkmal-Schlüsselsystem • Anwendung und Schlüsselteil • VGB-B 109 • Ausgabe 2003 • Availability of Thermal Power Plants • Fundamentals and Determination • VGB-R 808 e • Edition 1999 Power Plant Information System KISSY Guidelines
Power Plant Information System KISSY Analyzed CapacityAvailability of Thermal Power Plants 1997-2006 Hard Coal27,816 MW Lignite23,153 MW Nuclear101,269 MW Oil/Gas24,196 MW Total Capacity (gross)176,434 MW
Time (h) Parameter Capacity (MW) Energy (GWh) Power Plant Information System KISSY Availability of Thermal Power PlantsParameter / Characterization Time Availability (%) Time Utilization (%) AvailabilityIndicators Energy Availability (%) Energy Utilization (%) Event Reliability (%)
Power Plant Information System KISSY Online Evaluation via Internet(Under Construction) Process of Data Selection(Definition of Collective) Process of Layout Selection(at the time: about 80 layouts under discussion) Peer Group I No. of Plants vs. AV-Classes Unavailability vs. Capacity Peer Group II Unavailability vs. EEX Peer Group III Peak Availability vs. EEX Owner´s Plant XY vs. YZ ( 80 Reports) Definition of Time Periode
Energy Availabilityduring peak time(Arbeitsverfügbarkeit inPeak-Zeiten) CO2 – Indicator(CO2 - Kennwert) CHP– Indicator(KWK - Kennwert) Energy Relibility(Arbeitsverlässlichkeit) Scheduled Compliance(Fahrplantreue) Time Availabilityduring Peak Time(Zeitverfügbarkeit inPeak-Zeiten) Scheduled capacity(Fahrplanleistung) Time Reliability(Zeitverlässlichkeit) Load dispatcher outage rate(Lastverteilerausfallrate) Commercial Reliabilityof Supply(Kommerzielle Versorgungs-zuverlässigkeit) Load dispatcher reliability(Lastverteilerverlässlichkeit) Power Plant Information System KISSY New defined Performance Indicators (under Discussion)
Power Plant Information System KISSY Typical outcome of anonymous evaluationFossil fired Units, total 1997-2005
Power Plant Information System KISSY Energy Availability Sub- and Super-Critical fossil fired PlantsFossil fired Power Plants 1996-2005
Power Plant Information System KISSY Energy Availability versus CapacityFossil fired Power Plants 1996-2005
Power Plant Information System KISSY Energy Availabilityversus AgeHard Coal fired Power Plants
Parameter Power Plant Information System KISSY Unavailability of Thermal Power PlantsParameter / Characterization Start of Event (time) End of Event (time) UA Energy (MWh) UA Capacity (MW) Character of Event Time Frame (EMS (11 Keys)) Kind of Event (EMS (16 Keys)) Main Effect (EMS (2 Keys)) Origin (KKS) Description
Examples for KISSY Application KISSY e.g. forcedOutage Powerful Tool forstrategicDecisions
Power Plant Information System KISSY Typical Outcome of anonymous Evaluation
others7 % steam, water cycles10 % pressure systems33 % evaporator feet water 16,0% system 4,1% steam system 5,5% HPsuperheater steam turbineplant12 % others 6,4% 5,5% IP turbine reheater 2,7% 3,9% HP turbine 3,5% economiser 3,1% others others 1,9% 3,8% casing, stator, FGD rotor 5,7% 10,4% combustion generator plant12 % air system fuel others 4,3% feeding 12,9% 3,3% other heat generation and fuel supply 26 % Power Plant Information System KISSY Analysis of OriginUnavailability of Thermal Power Plants (Example)
Power Plant Information System KISSY Typical Outcome of anonymous EvaluationFossil fired Units, total 1997-2006 Liberalization of Power Market
Power Plant Information System KISSY Typical Outcome of anonymous EvaluationFossil fired Units, total 1997-2006
Power Plant Information System KISSY Example UCF Identification of own position in comparison to the rest ? what can be done to improve ?
others7 % steam, water cycles10 % pressure systems33 % evaporator feet water 16,0% system 4,1% steam system 5,5% HPsuperheater steam turbineplant12 % others 6,4% 5,5% IP turbine reheater 2,7% 3,9% HP turbine 3,5% economiser 3,1% others others 1,9% 3,8% casing, stator, FGD rotor 5,7% 10,4% combustion generator plant12 % air system fuel others 4,3% feeding 12,9% 3,3% other heat generation and fuel supply 26 % Power Plant Information System KISSY Analysis of OriginUnavailability of Thermal Power Plants (Example)
Power Plant Information System KISSY Example UCF UCF over the years ? where is my position ?
Power Plant Information System KISSY Example UCF
Power Plant Information System KISSY Example UCF function of unit size
Power Plant Information System KISSY Example UCF
Examples for KISSY Application • Redundancy Feedwater Pump • Damages in Gas /Steam Turbine • Transformer for strategic decisions on • Plant Concept • Maintenance • Spare Part Management
EvaluationofnecessaryRedundancies major root causes are not the pump and motor auxiliary systems !
Evaluation of Gas Turbine Failures caused by Design out of Control …can be optimised by Operation Mode
Evaluation of Steam Turbine Failures caused by Design out of Control can only be controlled by maintenance
Evaluation of Transformer Failures caused by Design out of Control - Monitoring
Modernisation Opportunity for Efficiency Increase stringent Consequence of Performance Indicator Analysis System previous boiler turbine cooling De-SOx new Heat Consumption 8705/8930 - -360/460 -44 - 8370/8490 Turbine kJ/kWh Boiler Efficiency % 84,0/85,0 +4,2/5,8 - - - 89,1/90,2 Auxiliary Consumption % 5,2 - - - +2 7,2 Unit Efficiency, net % 31,0/32,0 +1,5/2,2 +1,5/1,9 +0,2 -0,7 35,5/36,1 Efficiency Increase of the B 500 MWel Units nominal load
KISSY Online - Data Base Selection of Power Plant Unit System Description KISSY
KISSY Online - Data Base Selection of Power Plant Unit