230 likes | 403 Views
Session 5. Social construction of technology (SCOT) framework. Periods of Intensive Debate About Tech. During the development / invention phase and for a time after it initially enters the consumer market When there is some sort of spectacular breakdown – i.e. Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster.
E N D
Session 5 Social construction of technology (SCOT) framework
Periods of Intensive Debate About Tech • During the development / invention phase and for a time after it initially enters the consumer market • When there is some sort of spectacular breakdown – i.e. Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster
Technological Determinism(s) Alternatives to Social Constructivism: Bijker on the history of the bicycle Fischer’s ‘User Heuristic’ Symptomatic Approaches • Heilbroner – do machines make history? • Do artifacts have politics? (Winner) • Billiard-Ball Model • Impact-Imprint Model
Terms: Relevant Social Groups Interpretive Flexibility Closure Social Construction of Technology (SCOT)
Social Construction of Technology [Bijker on the bicycle] Athletic young men Concerned community members Highwheeledbicycle
Innovations Pedals Wire spokes Metal vs. wood components Large front wheel Hollow front fork 3 wheels Detachable handlebars Chain drive Antivibration gear Pneumatic tire Issues Weight Ease of mounting Speed Comfort/vibrations Stability Maneuverability Cost Aesthetics Maintenance and repair Decency/propriety The Invention of the Bicycle
Terms: Relevant Social Groups Interpretive Flexibility Closure Social Construction of Technology (SCOT)
A more SCOT-like representation of a technology’s history of development and diffusion
Critique of SCOT: role of users in shaping technological form
Actor-Network Theory readings for Thursday…be patient with these readings, try to embrace the ambiguity, read for the big picture, why is Latour’s article titled “where are the missing masses?” Assignment 1 to be posted on the site today Administrative