370 likes | 520 Views
Transparency as an instrument to achieve the Lisbon objectives Bled forum on Europe 2007 “Governing Futures”. Bled, 2 March 2007. dr. Franci DEMŠAR, ARRS franci.demsar@arrs.si.
E N D
Transparency as an instrument to achieve the Lisbon objectivesBled forum on Europe 2007“Governing Futures” Bled, 2 March 2007 dr. Franci DEMŠAR, ARRS franci.demsar@arrs.si
“Knowledge is becoming the main source of wealth for nations, companies and people, but it can also become the main factor of inequality” (Rodrigues, 2003)
Contents: • Lisbon strategy- challenge for national research • Research in Slovenia – state of the art • Institutional design for supporting research and the role of SRA • Principles of transparency in the function of fostering the implementation of Lisbon targets
The key of modern society – knowledge society • Knowledge creation is fostered by information and communication technologies • Sophisticated procedures to codify, to learn and to manage knowledge • Perception of knowledge as a strategic asset of companies, nations and people Knowledge policies = policies aiming at fostering and shaping the transformation to a knowledge-based society
Why transparency in the context of Lisbon process • To ensure accurate and controlled distribution of money with predictable and ex ante known procedures and increase the effectiveness of the research system • To show results of investments in research to policy makers and general public and therefore justify the necessity and importance of increased investments in science – why 3 % investments in RTD
Contents: • Lisbon strategy- challenge for national research • Research in Slovenia – state of the art • Institutional design for supporting research and the role of SRA • Principles of transparency in the function of fostering the implementation of Lisbon targets
Comparative structure of the sources of financing R&D expenditure
Funding from different sources as a % share of RD expenditure by sector of performance Fi Fi Fi
R&D expenditure as a % of GDP Sw Eu Slo
Slo National investment in RTD(€ per capita)
NRDP target: increase RTD financing • In accordance with Barcelona target of 3 % GDP • Year 2006 1,8 % BDP • Year 2008 2,5 % BDP • Year 2010 about 3 % BDB (2/3 from business sector)
Contents: • Lisbon strategy- challenge for national research • Research in Slovenia – state of the art • Institutional design for supporting research and the role of SRA • Principles of transparency in the function of fostering the implementation of Lisbon targets
National organisation chart of public decision-making and funding Science & Technology Council of the Republic of Slovenia Governmentof the Republic of Slovenia Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology Other ministries Ministry of Defence SlovenianResearch Agency Funding of Science
SRA Policy instruments • Research programmes • Basic and applied research projects • Targeted research programmes • Young researchers
Main Slovenian R&D policy objectives • to increase investments in R&D according to the 3% GDP • to increase effectiveness of public investments in R&D • to strengthen human resources in R&D • to strengthen R&D co-operation between public research sector and enterprises • to strengthen business sector R&D • to increase international co-operation
Contents: • Lisbon strategy- challenge for national research • Research in Slovenia – state of the art • Institutional design for supporting research and the role of SRA • Principles of transparency in the function of fostering the implementation of Lisbon targets
The role of transparency in the process of supporting and managing science • Control over the use and distribution of research money and indirect control of public over the work of researchers • Public availability of research results (for researchers and general public) • Dissemination of research results in short and understandable form
Elements of transparency • Transparency of instruments • Transparency of procedures • Financial transparency • Transparency of results of the research
Elements of transparency(The case of SRA) • Transparency of instruments • Annual plan of public calls • Timetable of evaluation process • Guidelines prepared by the Ministry of higher education science and technology; • Published names peers and members of decision-making bodies
Elements of transparency (The case of SRA) • Transparency of procedures • Evaluation methodology– unique for each field of science • Transparent membership in expert bodies (published on SRA home page) • Procedure of peers selection is known in advance • Evaluation criteria (questions for peers) are prepared, adopted and published in advance • Publicly available results of selection process
ELIGIBILITY TEST Administrative bodies of SRA RESEARCH EVALUATION PROCESS - EXPERT SYSTEM OF SRA - Professional body for evaluation of proposals for… FOREIGN PEERS Quantitative data DOMESTIC PEERS Professional body for evaluation of proposals for… Scientific council of SRA Management board of SRA
Elements of transparency (The case of SRA) • Financial Transparency • Annual financial reports (White book on financing) • Up-to date overview of distribution of budget(online white book)
Elements of transparency (The case of SRA) • Transparency of research results • Use of COBISS bibliographic system • Use of SICRIS system and its abstracts of research work • The most important scientific results • Socio-economic significance of research • Use of international citation indexes (ISI, CSA and other bibliographic databases • In the future implementation of full text database
Advantages of transparency principles implementation • Establishing legitimacy of increased investments in science and research • Control over the money flow • Openness and easy accessibility of research results • Promotion of research careers • Accurate updating of data about researchers and research • Increased quality of research work and procedures
Increases effectiveness of invested research money is controlled by broad public • Better communication between knowledge producers and knowledge users • Increased importance of knowledge as a value