1 / 30

Sarajevo, 2 6 March 2007

The B-Schools’ Future & International Accreditations Prof. Dr. Eric Cornuel Director General, EFMD. Sarajevo, 2 6 March 2007. Mission. EFMD acts as a catalyst to promote and enhance excellence in management development in Europe and worldwide. EFMD Services. ADVISORY. QUALITY. NETWORK.

glenys
Download Presentation

Sarajevo, 2 6 March 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The B-Schools’ Future & International Accreditations Prof. Dr. Eric Cornuel Director General, EFMD Sarajevo, 26 March 2007

  2. Mission EFMD acts as a catalyst to promote and enhance excellence in management development in Europe and worldwide

  3. EFMD Services ADVISORY QUALITY NETWORK PROJECTS ADVOCACY KNOWLEDGE

  4. Benefits for members Quality improvement tools • The European Quality Improvement System (EQUIS) • EFMD Programme Accreditation (EPAS) • Technology-Enhanced Learning Accreditation (CEL) • Corporate Learning Improvement Process (CLIP) Network Services • EFMD Conferences • Learning groups • Special interest groups • Workshops

  5. Benefits for members Knowledge services • Newsletters and magazines • Access to the Executive Education Library On-Line • Research publications • Survey reports Advisory Services • Seminars and workshops on important and strategic issues • In-house seminars/workshops tailored to the individual needs of members • Individual advisory services to individual members

  6. Benefits for members International Advocacy • EFMD active in international forums, such as UNDP, UN Global Compact, World Bank • European Affairs International Projects • EFMD partners with members to create international consortia: • Answers call for tenders/call for proposals of International institutions, such as EU, World Bank, National governments… • Promotes joint initiatives in higher education • Main domain of expertise: Quality and accreditation; e-learning; research and surveys

  7. MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AT A GLANCE • Continental versus Anglo-Saxon Models; • Convergence towards a Bologna-like format; • Public, private, and mixed structures; • Strong development of the “MBA / EMBA”; • English becomes a must; • Good internationalization level; • Accreditation systems: EQUIS, AACSB, AMBA, EPAS.

  8. WE HAVE SERIOUS STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS • Great difficulty to mobilize resources and the critical mass issue • International visibility of diplomas • PhDs and faculty shortage

  9. MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: A ROLE TO PLAY IN EUROPE • Redefine research: more heuristic; • Rethink the role of humanities; • Better test the concept of academic airbus to stay in the global race; • Prepare (quantitatively & qualitatively) the future generation of Faculty and administrators; • Train humble leaders, change agents with a broader vision of their tasks.

  10. QUALITY SERVICES AT EFMD: ACCREDITATION SCHEMES

  11. EFMDQuality Schemes • EQUIS - the EFMD accreditation for international business schools  (institutional accreditation) • EPAS - the EFMD accreditation for international degree programmes in business & management or related areas (all levels: Bachelors to Doctoral degrees) • CEL - the EFMD accreditation for management education programmes with ICT based learning • CLIP - the EFMD accreditation for the global learning units of corporations  (e.g. corporate universities, mgt academies, Executive Training Centres)

  12. Aims of EFMD Quality Initiatives • Definition and raising of standards: a comprehensive framework of internationally agreed Quality Standards • Awarding a Quality Label upon successful completion of the process

  13. Benefits of EFMD Quality Initiatives • Providing market information in view of need for market transparency • International market recognition of excellence • International comparison and mechanisms for international benchmarking • Instrument for and acceleration of Quality Improvement in international management education • Sharing of good practice and mutual learning • Recommendations and guidance for Quality Improvement to institutions/programmes and future development of the organisation

  14. Differentiating Factors of EFMD Quality Initiatives • Internationalisation as a key criterion • Focus on diversity • Quality assessed based upon a Quality Framework • Links academic and corporate needs • Importance of mission/strategy

  15. EFMD Quality Schemes: Management • Run by EFMD Quality & Corporate Services • Designed and managed by • Academics across Europe & the globe • Corporate Learning Heads across Europe • Advised by Steering Committees, including • CLOs from member companies • Members of the EFMD management team • Members designated by the EFMD Board • Members of leading European Business Schools • Accreditation Boards

  16. EFMD Quality Schemes: Processes • Application / Eligibility • Self Assessment • Peer Review Visit (strategic audit) & Peer Review Report • Decision on Accreditation and/or Awarding of a Quality Label • Action Plan for Quality Improvement and Institutional Development

  17. CEL - teChnology-Enhanced Learning accreditation • Must be related to management education, • Must have the equivalent of a minimum of 100 hours of candidate learning effort, • Must include participant feedback mechanism, • Must have been operated at least once. • A programme is considered “ITC-Supported” if 20% of its overall duration is delivered by teaching or learning methods within the range of technology-enhanced learning.

  18. CEL QualityCriteria Programme Strategy Pedagogy Economics Organisation Technology Culture

  19. CLIP - Corporate Learning Improvement Process • A Tool for Assessment and Development of the Corporate Learning Function • Focus on Corporate Universities, Management Academies, Executive Training Centres and Learning Organisations within companies. • A Mechanism for International / Intercompany Benchmarking • A Service to EFMD Corporate Members

  20. Objectives of CLIP Mobilisation of the European Corporate Learning Community to work for: • Definition of Standards • Raising of Standards • Mutual Learning • Sharing of Good Practice • Enhanced Internal and External Recognition of CUs • Greater Effectiveness of Corporate Learning • Contribution of the Corporate Learning Function to Overall Company Strategy

  21. CLIP Criteria Framework LEARNING PROCESS QUALITY LEARNING CONTEXT MISSION RESOURCES MARKETS Design model Positioning Alignment Strategy Governance Legitimacy Management • Internal Training • Resources • Core staff • Senior Mgt • Line Mgt • ExternalSuppliers • Selection • Relationship Management • Internal • Business units • Subsidiaries • External • Customers • Suppliers • Participants • Selection • Needs analysis • Measurement Portfolio Design Content Delivery Transfer Coaching Monitoring Evaluation • Innovation and Development • Physical Resources • International Perspective

  22. EPAS - EFMD Programme Accreditation System • Launched in 2005 due to a perceived need and demand for a pan-European or international programme accreditation scheme, especially motivated by the implementation of the Bologna reforms in Europe • Institutions often need guidance in times of reform & turmoil • Markets need transparency to aid vertical student mobility • EPAS designed to evaluate and accredit high quality programmes with a strong international perspective

  23. EPAS – Benefits and Markets Benefits: • International market recognition of programme excellence and of the added supranational dimension of internationalisation • Assistance with programme definition • Quality improvement and benchmarking Target market: Institutions with programmes aiming to • Recruit international students • Take advantage of increasing European & international mobility • Achieve quality standards higher than national norms

  24. EPAS - Accreditation Criteria • Institutional, National and International Context • National HE system, Regulatory & legal framework • European HE Area (Bologna) – when applicable • Institutional context and objectives • Programmes to be assessed • Teaching faculty, resources & facilities Programme Design Programme objectives Target market & intended graduate profile Marketing & promotion Intended learning outcomes Programme coverage & content Delivery modes Assessment methods Programme Delivery Student entry requirements & selection methods Pedagogical methods Quality of pedagogy & learning materials Personal development inc work based learning International opportunities Corporate interaction Programme Outcomes Assessment output Graduate quality Career / jobs Alumni Reputation Quality Assurance Processes Programme Value Chain Model

  25. The EQUIS Challenge: A single system to cover a vast diversity • Institutional Diversity • National education systems • Organisation of Higher Education Institutions • Private vs Public • Programme Diversity • First degree, Post graduate, Executive education • Diverse programme formats • Single, dual, multiple, joint degrees • Geographical and Cultural Diversity • Different values and expectations • Leadership styles • Professorial roles

  26. The EQUIS Response • Promotion of diversity • Source of Innovation and Creativity: a richer world • There is no single model • European origin: diversity is the rule • Not based on any national or historical background • Some things are better for certain purposes: no best way • First learn... • Understand the local context • Understand mission and strategy • Bring an international perspective • Be open to persuasive evidence • ...only then, assess.

  27. EQUIS Differentiating Factors (1) • Institutional Assessment • Whole School Assessment: all programmes, research and other activities • Degree or non-degree programmes, including executive education • Guided Development only after Peer Review Visit • Linked to both academic and corporate needs • Involves both academic and corporate stakeholders at all levels • Balance between academic and professional skills • Emphasis on personal development • Corporate links: key criterion • Importance of strategy and governance • Participation of experienced Deans in Peer Review Teams

  28. EQUIS Differentiating Factors (2) • Internationalisation as a key criterion • Of quality standards • Of reputation • Of the school culture • EQUIS managed by international team • Focus on diversity • Less normative in general but especially on • Curriculum structure and content • Faculty composition and deployment • Random audit vs exhaustive audit • Consultants rather than auditors • Quality framed on 11 criteria • EQUIS differential: Corporate links, internationalisation, personal development and executive education

  29. EQUIS FRAMEWORK CORPORATECONNECTIONS STUDENTS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION CONTEXT & STRATEGY RESOURCES & ADMINISTRATION PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION TO COMMUNITY PROGRAMMES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FACULTY INTERNATIONALISATION

  30. Thank you! www.efmd.org

More Related