530 likes | 773 Views
18 Feb 03. Overview. HistoryOrganization and functionsData and surveillance issuesResearch: recent research/investigations. Epidemiologists at the AF Safety Center. ?A Brief History"?A History of Its Brief Existence". 18 Feb 03. AFEB Recommendation. ?The AFEB concludes that Military Medical Dep
E N D
2. 18 Feb 03 Overview History
Organization and functions
Data and surveillance issues
Research: recent research/investigations
3. Epidemiologists at the AF Safety Center A Brief History
A History of Its Brief Existence
4. 18 Feb 03 AFEB Recommendation The AFEB concludes that Military Medical Departments can make significant contributions to the future success of injury prevention programs. That success depends on . . . strengthening partnerships with the Service Safety Centers and line commanders who have the primary responsibility for preventing injuries
Hansen B & Jones B. Injuries in the Military: A Hidden Epidemic (report to the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, 1996)
5. 18 Feb 03 AFEB-sponsored team visit to Safety Ctr 1997: AF/MIQ tasks OPHSA to provide epidemiological assistance to Center
OPHSA contracts with AFEB members and advisors
2 team visits in 1997; members:
Col (Dr) Bruce Jones, USACHPPM
Col Vicky Fogelman, Exec Secy AFEB
Prof Susan Baker, Johns Hopkins Ctr for Injury Prev Research
Maj (Dr) Paul Amoroso, USA Research Institute for Env Med
Maj Bruce Copley, AF OPHSA (coordinator)
6. 18 Feb 03 Major recommendations Continue to focus on acquiring Class C (generally high freq, lower severity) mishaps in addition to the sentinel events (Classes A & B)
Modernize the existing electronic reporting system
Provide analytical feedback to the field
Partner with OPHSA for specific analytical work
Consider changing manpower structure to accommodate an AFMS epidemiologist
7. 18 Feb 03 SEPR: SE-SG PartnershipThe Air Force response to the recommendation 1997 1st epidemiologist position authorized and filled (Lt Col) *
1999 2nd epidemiologist position authorized and filled (Maj Lt Col)
2001 3rd epidemiologist position authorized and filled (Capt)
* Doctorate requirement established in FY2000
8. 18 Feb 03
9. Epidemiology & Research Role
10. 18 Feb 03 Public Health Model of Injury Prevention & Control Identify and prioritize problems (injury surveillance)
Quantify and prioritize risk factors (analytic injury research)
Identify existing or develop new strategies to prevent occupational injuries (countermeasures)
Implement the most effective injury control measures (program/policy implementation)
Monitor the results of intervention efforts (evaluation) This is the PH model adapted for injuries which doesnt differ (except for references to injuries) from the model used to address any PH problemThis is the PH model adapted for injuries which doesnt differ (except for references to injuries) from the model used to address any PH problem
11. 18 Feb 03 Incomplete PH model in DoDInjury control/prev programs arent Medical Identify and prioritize problems
Quantify and prioritize risk factors
Identify existing or develop new strategies to prevent occupational injuries
Implement the most effective injury control measures
Monitor the results of intervention efforts In DoD, injury prev/control programs are a Line/safety program.
#3: Medical personnel are generally weak in this area except for a few officers (mostly PMOs) who have training and experience on what interventions would work. Even doctoral trained injury epidemiologists (like me) may easily find risk/causal factors, but we cant always know how to build a fix
#4: Medical has historically been completely out of the loop here, as this step generally means taking the intervention/program to the streets which also includes policy implementation if the intervention is across-the-board. Safety programs arent Medical obviously.In DoD, injury prev/control programs are a Line/safety program.
#3: Medical personnel are generally weak in this area except for a few officers (mostly PMOs) who have training and experience on what interventions would work. Even doctoral trained injury epidemiologists (like me) may easily find risk/causal factors, but we cant always know how to build a fix
#4: Medical has historically been completely out of the loop here, as this step generally means taking the intervention/program to the streets which also includes policy implementation if the intervention is across-the-board. Safety programs arent Medical obviously.
12. Data and Surveillance Issues
13. 18 Feb 03 Ground Rules: DoD Instruction 6055.7Accident Investigation, Reporting, and Record Keeping Scope: Accidental death, injury, occupational illness, and property damage
Injury defined: Traumatic wound or other condition caused by external force or deprivation (drowning, suffocation, exposure, cold injury, dehydration)
Exclusions: Suicide, homicide, workplace violence, legal intervention
Also, combat-related injuries and deaths not includedCasualty Reporting System accounts for these
Non-AF units (e.g., joint commands)
14. 18 Feb 03 Mishap categories (severity levels)DoDI 6055.7 & AFI 91-204 Class A
Class B
Class C Cost = $1M+
Fatal or totally disabling (perm)
Lost aircraft
Cost: $200K - <$1M
Partially disabling (perm)
3+ people hospitalized
Cost: $20K - <$200K
LWI 8+hrs beyond current; occ illness (any lost time)
15. Safety vs Medical Injury Case Definitions and Levels of Severity
16. 18 Feb 03 USAF Injury PyramidMedical Definition* In reality, we spend most of our time (naturally) where the demand is highest
Internal and external customers demands are very similar
Very little activity at Levels 4-5 (gray area at top)
Time spent at each level proportional to the strata of the pyramid
But, this only includes analytical time, not time spent doing non-analytical things (next slide covers that)In reality, we spend most of our time (naturally) where the demand is highest
Internal and external customers demands are very similar
Very little activity at Levels 4-5 (gray area at top)
Time spent at each level proportional to the strata of the pyramid
But, this only includes analytical time, not time spent doing non-analytical things (next slide covers that)
17. 18 Feb 03
18. 18 Feb 03 Surveillance operations Reporting via web-based AF Safety Automated System (AFSAS)
World-wide reporting locations at base safety offices
Aviation, ground, weapons, and occ illness modules
Occupational illness modulea prototype
Being appended to USAFs Command Core System for comprehensive occupational health management
All occupational (injury and illness) data will then be maintained at Safety Ctr (proposed transfer of occ illness from AFIERA)
IERA will have open access
19. 18 Feb 03 Real-time occ injury & illness infoRates/100 servicemembers, available on desktop icon
20. 18 Feb 03 Linkage to DMSS data Objective: enhance surveillance completeness
2 levels of injury/mishap surveillance
Passive: Rely exclusively on supervisors reports
Active: Access MTF medical logs to find unreported cases
Problem: About 50% of injuries initially treated outside MTFs (contract care, MTF closures, ED closures); biggest impact on USAF
Solution: electronically alert Safety of injury-related hospitalization (? lost workday) using DMSS data
Base-specific notifications posted to secure web site
MOA signed; first download on 13 Feb
21. 18 Feb 03 Research activity Multi-disciplinary
operational
epidemiological
behavioral/human factors
Covers all functional areas (flight, ground, weapons)
22. Motor vehicle crashes, Class A FY88-FY02: Initiators and contributing factors Lt Col Bruce Copley
Lt Col Julie Robinson
Lt Col Maggie Meigs
Capt Matt Shim
23. 18 Feb 03 Driving behaviors: mishap initiators Automobiles vs Motorcycles, Class A FY88-FY02
24. 18 Feb 03 Top 5 contributing factors: Autos vs motorcyclesPercent of Class A mishaps in which each factor was noted
25. Relation between mishap rates & occupational stresses due to manpower demand and operational tempo Lt Col Bruce Copley
Capt Matt Shim
26. 18 Feb 03 Stressed vs non-stressed career fieldsDominant AFSCs by number in enlisted career fieldsOfficial designation by AF/XPM Manpower-stressed
Security forces (21,960)*
Crypto linguist (2,904)
Comm network/switch/crypto systems (2,575)
Intel application (2,229)
Comm cable & antenna & telephone sys (1,920)
Non-stressed fields
A/C Propulsion/AGE/ Egress/Fuel Sys (19,455)
Fighter/tactical AC maintenance (13,307)
Aerospace/Helo Maint (12,975)
Info Management (10,766)
27. 18 Feb 03 Manpower-stressed career fieldsComparison of mishap rates
28. 18 Feb 03 Manpower-stressed career fieldsComparison of period mishap rates by cohort
29. 18 Feb 03 Manpower-stressed career fieldsComparison of cohort mishap rates by period
30. 18 Feb 03 Conclusion Period effects > cohort (exposure) effects
Cohort effect: Mildnot statistically significant in either pd, but post-9/11 rate increase higher in stressed group
Rates in stressed group higher even before 9/11
Period effect: Moderatestatistically significant in both pds; post-9/11 stressed rate increase ?2x non-stressed
Both stressed and non-stressed are affected by the post-9/11 demands
31. 18 Feb 03 Operational tempo (OPSTEMPO) stressesDominant AFSCs by number in enlisted career fields OPSTEMPO-stressed
Security forces (21,960)
All medical (21,666)
All communication (13,176)
All intelligence (10,202)
All transportation (10,128)
All air crew (7,358)
Non-stressed fields
A/C Propulsion/AGE/ Egress/Fuel Sys (19,455)
Fighter/tactical AC maintenance (13,307)
Aerospace/Helo Maint (12,975)
Info Management (10,766)
32. Are injury incidence rates higher in recently re-deployed airmen?: A nested case-control study Lt Col Bruce Copley
Supplemental DMSS medical and personnel data, database linkage, and linked data set construction provided by Army Medical Surveillance Activity (USACHPPM)
33. 18 Feb 03 Study parameters OutcomeSafety: Injuries reported via USAF mishap reporting system; date range: 9 Jun 00 30 Sep 02
OutcomeMedical: 1st injury-related medical visits, same date range; AMSA/DMSS case definition; in- and out-patient medical data systems, both MTF and outsourced
Exposure (both series): Redeployed within past 30 days (from date of injury as determined by cases); rtn from deployment date range: 13 Jan 00 11 Sep 02; deployment duration at least 30 days
Controls selected from DMSS at random from USAF active duty population on date of injury
34. 18 Feb 03 Injury incidence rate ratios30- & 60-day return from 30+ day deployment vs otherwise* USAF Oct 99-Aug 02
35. Acute non-battle injuries in USAF personnel deployed to Southwest Asia (pre-9/11) Lt Col Bruce Copley
Lt Col Kevin Grayson (AFIERA)
36. 18 Feb 03 Methods Data Source: Global Expeditionary Medical System (GEMS)
Records all in- and out-patient visits in deployed locations
Wider array of injury severity than in Safety database
Considerable work needed to restrict data to newly-occurring injuries (eliminating repeat visits, etc) = incidence
All but USAF records removed
Repeat visits removed
Assumes stable denominator through 180 days (everyone had Day 1, . . . , Day 180)
Study period: 12 months before 9/11
37. 18 Feb 03 Overall USAF perspectiveRates/1,000 airmen
38. 18 Feb 03 USAF Injury Incidence Ratesby elapsed day in SWA
39. 18 Feb 03 Predicted rates for operational planning
40. 18 Feb 03 Injury incidence by external cause
41. 18 Feb 03 External cause of injury & disposition
42. Occupational injury surveillance & research Lt Col Bruce Copley
Lt Col Bruce Burnham
43. 18 Feb 03 2 Case definitions Broad
Includes injuries sustained in the USAF-owned environment
Includes military PT
Specific = industrial
Includes only injuries sustained while within premises of an actual worksite or performing job-specific task
Excludes military PT
Exclusions in both definitions:
Horseplay as categorized in the mishap reports
Sports and recreation injuries (e.g., lunchtime pick-up game)
44. 18 Feb 03 Occupational injury surveillanceIndustrial case definition, FY92-FY02
45. 18 Feb 03 USAF Occupational Injury Rate TrendsCivilian vs Military
46. 18 Feb 03 Number of civilian occupational injuries mil vs civ, by major command, FY92-FY02
47. 18 Feb 03 Occupational (industrial) injuriesAvg age by anatomical region, mil and civ
48. 18 Feb 03 Occupational injuries, FY95-FY02Enlisted occupational categories*, drill-down
49. 18 Feb 03 Occupational injury surveillanceExternal causes of 321 occ injuries in security forces
50. 18 Feb 03 Workplace injury ratesGeneral Schedule employees, FY92-FY02
51. 18 Feb 03 Occupational injury surveillanceExternal causes of 237 occ injuries in civilian firefighters
52. 18 Feb 03 Future research & surveillance agenda Research
Occupation-specific external cause analyses
Continuing to monitor effects of deployments, OPSTEMPO, and manpower shortages
Human factor research on flight-related mishaps
Surveillance
Set alert and action thresholds for outbreaks of specific aviation failures or sentinel injuries via time-series analysis
Participation in DoD efforts to further qualify, quantify, and understand lost workday injuries
53. Points of contact:Lt Col Bruce Copley (505) 846-0792 Lt Col Bruce Burnham (505) 846-2663DSN prefix: 246 Organizational (branch) email: afsc.sepr@kirtland.af.mil
54. 18 Feb 03