200 likes | 225 Views
Explore how DuPont Fluoroproducts Expansion Programs at the Washington Works Facility in West Virginia overcame historical challenges through the implementation of EPC principles, leading to significant improvements in safety, productivity, cost control, and relationships. Learn about the critical success factors, barriers, and evolution of the EPC approach for project execution.
E N D
Program Success through Execution John Rigby JBEK Vic Kleinfelter DuPont Case Study 2000 CII Annual Conference Nashville, Tennessee
A Case Study DuPont Fluoroproducts Expansion Programs Washington Works Facility Parkersburg, West Virginia
Owner’s Site Washington Works Site • Eight major manufacturing areas • 2,000 acres • 200 employees in 1948; over 2,300 now
Period Work Projects Value 1994-1995 Miscellaneous 6 $50 MM 1995-1997 FP* Expansion 5 $180 MM (EPC I) 1997-2000 FP* Improvements 7 $80 MM (EPC II) Site Capital Work *Fluoropolymers
Alliance Contractors for Program JBEK (Joint venture: BE&K and Kvaerner) • Contractor EPC Program Manager • Engineering-procurement responsibility MK (Joint venture partner with JBEK for EPC) • Construction responsibility
History • Low levels of work • Contractors working independently for DuPont • No state-of-the-art engineering tools • Craft resource pool oriented toward small capital work, supplemental maintenance
History(continued) • Major cost overruns • Late completions • Rework and change combined - in excess of 20 percent • No team orientation
The Challenge • Safety-health-environment is a requirement. • Leadership and teamwork essential to success. • Use EPC principles for execution.
EPC Principles of Execution • Total project focus • Single-point responsibility • Open communications • Performance-driven execution • Truly integrated systems • Flexibility to meet the business needs
Program Success • Systems • Work processes • People relationships Critical Success Factors Barriers • Tenants • Safety-Health-Environment • Schedule • Cost • Quality • Relationships
E P C The Evolution • Two alliance contractors individually serving DuPont • Two alliance contractors working together — EPC contractors • EPC contractors integrated with DuPont businesses — EPC Team
E P C The Program’s Improvement Areas • Safety • Work force productivity • Labor relations • Construction innovation • Engineering design tools and deliverables • Pipe rework • Project controls • Procurement and material control • Relationships
Business Cost Evaluation EPC Evaluation ITC 20% (Shown as trend only) (Over-run) Budget/Cost Performance 0 EPCTeamProgram Pre-Program EPC 1Program (Under-run) -20% ’94 ’95 ’96 ’97 ’98 ’99 ’00
73.6 73.4 72.9 72.7 72.7 72.5 72.3 72.2 72.1 71.9 71.9 71.7 71.5 71.5 71.1 71.1 70.7 70.7 70.2 70.1 70.1 70 69.3 69.1 67.9 67.8 67.3 67.4 67.1 67.1 67 66.7 65.8 65.7 65.6 65.3 64.7 60.4 Total Site Work Sample SummaryField and Shop Combined 75 Site Goal = 74 70 % 65 60 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Program Carry-Over to Site Performance Delrin Capper Replacement Project • History • Initial Concept • $4.0 MM budget • Outage of six to eight weeks • Final Proposal • $2.3 MM budget • 18-day outage • Construction Innovation through Engineering • 650-ton Demag • Twin path (fiber optic) slings
Program Carry-Over to Site Performance Delrin Capper Replacement Project • Final results: $12.125 MM value • 15-day outage • Completed under budget • Direct business value • $2.0 MM under original concept • Completed almost six weeks early ($10.125 MM) • Added value • Reduced maintenance cost ($1.0 MM/yr) • Uptime gain ($1.0 MM/yr)
Future State Successful Accomplish- ments EPC Future Programs EPC FP Program CIP Lessons Learned
EPC Team A legacy for the future
Program Success through Execution Implementation Session Moderator: John Rigby (JBEK) Panelists: Vic Kleinfelter (DuPont) J. Peter Ellefson (DuPont) David Adams (MK Corp.) Presentation: David Adams Safety Labor Relations Work Force Productivity Pete Ellefson Design Tools Pipe Rework Responsiveness to Change Relationships Value-Added Results