390 likes | 605 Views
Genetic Counseling in the Prenatal Setting. Adapted from a presentation by: Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Sc.M. Prenatal Genetic Counselor Johns Hopkins Hospital Prenatal Diagnostic Center Adapted for Development of Young Children with Disabilities #872.514 (61) Carol Ann Heath.
E N D
Genetic Counseling in the Prenatal Setting Adapted from a presentation by: Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Sc.M. Prenatal Genetic Counselor Johns Hopkins Hospital Prenatal Diagnostic Center Adapted for Development of Young Children with Disabilities#872.514 (61)Carol Ann Heath
Genetic Counseling • Definition • History: Models of Genetic Counseling • Process • Profession • Prenatal Genetic Counseling • Process • Indications • Prenatal Testing • Psychosocial Issues • Ethical Implications
Genetic Counseling How would you define genetic counseling? What experiences (if any) have you had with genetic counseling?
Genetic Counseling: Definition “The genetic counselor is a health professional who is academically and clinically prepared to provide genetic services to individuals and families seeking information about the occurrence, of risk of occurrence, of a genetic condition or birth defect. The genetic counselor communicates genetic, medical, and technical information in a comprehensive, understandable, non-directive manner with knowledge of an insight into the psychosocial and ethno cultural experiences important to each client and family. The counselor provides client-centered, supportive counseling regarding the issues, concerns, and experiences meaningful to the client’s circumstances.” American Board of Genetic Counseling
History: Models of Genetic Counseling • Eugene Model (“well born”) • Sheldon Reed (1947) coined term “Genetic Counseling” • Bateson (1906) – Study of hereditary • “Advising” people about inherited traits • Eugenics Records Office at Cold Spring Harbor • Collected data and provided information to affected families • Mandatory Sterilization of “mentally defective” (1926) • 23 out of 48 United States
Models • Medical/Preventive Model • 1940’s • Retreat from “advisement” with a focus on prevention by offering risk information • Decision-Making Model • 1950’s – Discovery of cytogenetics of several chromosomal conditions • Emphasis on providing information in an interactive process
Models • Psychotherapeutic Model • Provision of information alone is not enough • Focus on response and experiences related to genetic conditions • Framework • Client-centered therapy – Carl Rogers • Non-directiveness
Genetic Counseling Profession • Masters Training Programs • 1971 Sarah Lawrence College • Currently 28 training Programs (USA) • National Society of Genetic Counselors • 1979 • American Board of Genetic Counseling • Certification process - 1981
Voluntary utilization Equal Access Client Education Complete disclosure of Information Nondirective counseling Attention to Psychosocial and Affective Dimensions in counseling Confidentiality Philosophy of Genetic Services
Process of Genetic Counseling • Information Gathering • Family and Medical History • Risk Assessment • Actual risk vs. perceived risk • Information Giving • “Educators” • Psychosocial Counseling
Genetic Counseling Contexts • Reproductive Issues** • Preconception counseling • Prenatal • Infertility • Pediatrics • Newborn Screening • Specialty Clinics • Adult-Onset conditions • Specialty Clinics • Pre-symptomatic testing: Breast and Colon Cancer, Huntingtons disease
Prenatal Genetic Counseling • Preconception Counseling • Carrier Screening • Family history of genetic condition • Risks and Pregnancy Options • Pregnancy • Advanced maternal Age • Abnormal Triples Screen- blood test • Family history of genetic condition • Fetus at risk for ____ • Infertility • Genetics of infertility • Risks of infertility treatments (ex: ICSI)
Impact of Prenatal Counseling/Diagnosis • Bonding (Klaus and Kennel, 1982) • Influence bond formation between mom and baby • Planning the pregnancy • Confirmation and acceptance of the pregnancy • Acceptance of the baby as a separate person • Timing of prenatal information • Pregnancy “on hold” until results of testing (Rothman, 1986)- tentative pregnancy
Amniocentesis Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS) Ultrasound Maternal blood multiple marker screening Chromosomes Enzymes DNA Testing AFP- protein made by liver Chromosomes Enzymes DNA Fetal Anatomy Down syndrome, Neural Tube Defects, trisomy 18 Prenatal diagnostic Techniques
Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques • Amniocentesis • Chorionic Villus Sampling • Maternal Serum Multiple Marker Screening • Ultrasound
Advanced Maternal Age • Definition: Women over the age of 35 • Slightly increased risk for chromosome condition • Down syndrome- extra #21 • Trisomy 13 and 18- extra 13 & 18 severe • Sex chromosome conditions • Offered: CVS or Amniocentesis and Detailed Ultrasound
Abnormal Triple Screen • Developed in 70’s (AFP) and early 80’s (“Triple” Screen) • “Offered” to all pregnant women • SCREENING TEST!!! 16-18 weeks • Down syndrome • Trisomy 18 • Neural Tube Defects • Three markers: AFP, hCG, uE3 • Offered: Ultrasound and/or amniocentesis
Ultrasound finding • May/may not be associated with chromosome condition or known genetic condition • Offered: Amniocentesis (possibly CVS)
Family history (previous pregnancy)genetic condition • Known genetic condition in family • Single gene disorders • Autosomal Recessive and Autosomal Dominant conditions, X-Linked conditions • Slide of inheritance • Examples: Cystic Fibrosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Sickle Cell Anemia
Family history cont. • History of unknown “condition” • Previous child with developmental delay and additional medical concerns but no diagnosis • History of recurring miscarriages/infant deaths • Offered: CVS/Amniocentesis (or Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)?)
Carrier Screening • Ashkenazi Jewish Population • Tay-Sachs (1/30), Canavans Disease (1/40), and Gaucher Disease (1/15) • Caucasian Population • Cystic Fibrosis (1/25) • African-American Population • Sickle Cell Anemia (1/10) • Greek/Mediterranean/Asian Population • Thalassemias
Maternal Exposures • Medications- lower dose in pregnancy • Ex: Seizure medications, Vitamin A • Drug-use • Ex: Heroin, Cocaine, Alcohol • Other • Maternal diabetes
Prenatal Counseling: Process • Information Gathering • Assess interests/needs • Patient’s “agenda” • Family History and Pregnancy History • ? Additional risks other than indication • Risk Assessment • Perceived risk • Information Giving • Diagnosis/Indication related • Prenatal testing options • Psychosocial Counseling
Patient’s agenda Personal Values Meaning of Pregnancy Infertility vs. unwanted pregnancy Social Support Past Social History Perceived Risks/Benefits of Anxiety Decision-making regarding: Testing Test result Pregnancy Psychosocial Counseling: Issues
To have or not to have???? What do you think are some of the factors to have or not to have prenatal diagnosis? Evans et al, 1990: Kolker & Burke, 1993; Marteau, 1995; Van Spijker, 1992
Faith/Spirituality Personal Values “What’s given” Information Experience with disability Beliefs on pregnancy termination Partner and family support Past experience with prenatal testing Friends and family Fears of test Tolerance for ambiguity Need for reassurance Anxiety given diagnosis Doctor’s “advice” Decision-making factors
Abnormal Prenatal Results • Counseling issues • Crisis and grief counseling • Support and facilitate decision-making • Provide information/resources/support groups • Outcome of Pregnancy • Continuation of pregnancy • Termination • Adoption
Prenatal testing: Ethical Implications What do you think are some of the ethical issues surrounding prenatal testing?
Ethical Issues: Disability • Medical Model of Disability • Implied eugenic Thrust? (Hubbard,1988) • Concern by advocates for persons with disabilities, feminists, and bioethicists • At the core of the medical model view is that “disability must be prevented, because disabled people cannot function within existing society” • Attribution Theory “The more help will be given when dependency is attributed to factors such as lack of ability on the victim’s part (internal but uncontrollable cause) than when it is attributed to lack of effort on the victim’s part (internal and controllable cause).” • Marteau and Drake (1995)
Ethical Issues • When to say when • How much testing can/will we offer? • Where will we draw the line? • Sex selection • “Perfect” baby • Presymptomatic testing prenatally • Ex: Breast cancer
Resources • National Society of Genetic counselors (NSGC) http//www.nsgc.org Phone: (610) 872-7608 • American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC) http://www.faseb/org/genetics/abgc/abgcmenu.htm Phone:(301) 571-1825 • Genetic Alliance (nonprofit organization) http://www. Geneticalliance.org
Resources • Helpful books: Baker, D., Schuette, J., and Uhlmann, W. (eds) (1988) A Guide to Genetic Counseling. New Your: Wiley-Liss Clarke, A. (ed) (1994) Genetic Counseling: Practice and Principles. London: Routledge. Parens, E., and Asch, A. (eds) (2000). Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Rapp, R. (1999). Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. New York: Routledge.
Citations • Black, R. (1992). Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 1 (1), 45-54. • Evans, M., Bottoms, S,. Critchfield, G., Greb, A,. & LaFerla, J. (1990). Parental perception of genetic risk: correlation with choice of prenatal diagnostic procedures. International Journal of Gynecology-Obstetrician, 31, 25-28. Hubbard, R. (1988). Eugenics: New tools, Old Ideas. Women Health, 12(1-2), 225-235. Klaus, M. and Kennel, J. (1982). Parental Infant Bonding. CV Mosby co. Kolker, A., & Burke, B. (1994). Prenatal Testing: A Sociological Perspective. Westport, CN: Bergen and Harvey
Citations • Lippman, A. (1991). Prenatal genetic testing and screening: Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law and Medicine,17, 15-49. Mataeu, T.,& Drake, H. (1995) Attributions for disability: The influence of genetic screening. Social Science and Medicine, 40(8), 1127-1132. Rothman, B. (1986). The tentative pregnancy. New York: Viking. Van Spijker, H. (1992) Support in decision-making processes in the post-counseling period. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, 28(1), 29-35