HLANDATA PROJECT: FIRST RESULTS AND SYNERGIES Isabel Goñi , TRACASA

1. HLANDATA PROJECT:FIRST RESULTS AND SYNERGIESIsabel Goñi , TRACASA

2. Overview Introduction First results/Synergies Next steps Conclusions

3. Partners Introduction

4. Main Goal Introduction To demonstrate the feasibility of harmonizing existing European Land Use and Land Cover Geographic Information considering data categorization and data models and also end users requirements through the development of user oriented value-added services

5. Workpackages Introduction

6. Objectives Introduction • To assess the relevant information related to the harmonization of the Land Use and Land Cover Datasets: • To make a proposal for the harmonization of the Land Use and Land Cover datasets • To develop and optimize ofcommon data sharing infrastructure (based on web services) needed for the management of the harmonized Land Use and Land Cover datasets • To implement 3 pilot projects providing some value added service to a certain type of end users. • To make the assessment and disseminate the obtained pilot results within their respective fields of action. • To promote the creation of an experts’ network composed of producers and users of this information. • .

7. WP1-2-3 Introduction 1 2 TASK 2.1 3 TASK 2.2

8. HLANDATA harmonization methodology First results v v vv vv vv

9. HLANDATA harmonization methodology First results • Scope: HLANDATA and SNPIRE • General approach for data harmonization • HLANDATA METHODOLOGY • 5.1. HLANDATA Harmonization Process • 5.2. HLANDATA Implementation of the Generic Web Services • ANNEX I BEST PRACTICES • Best practice 1: Creation of LU data using remote sensing techniques • ANNEX II Tools Use Case Examples • II.1. Metadata remodelling using CatMDEdit • II.2. GeoNetwork with Government of Navarra (SCA: Special Conservation Areas) • II.3. Data modelling using GeoConverter tool. • II.4. Step by step guideline for creating WMS with selected tools • ANNEX III TOOLS • III.1. Metadata tools • III.2. Data Tools • III.3. WMS toolsv

10. HLANDATA harmonization proposal First results: Synergies ? 1 2 TASK 2.1 3

11. HLANDATA harmonization proposal First results: Synergies ?

12. HLANDATA harmonization proposal First results: Synergies

13. HLANDATA harmonization proposal First results: Synergies • DS LU/LC v 2.0 • Suggested profile model approach • Integrated Core model, Existing model & Planned model • Participation on the development of the nomenclature • Adopt a common and feasible LU nomenclature designed for INSPIRE. And permit in appropriate way rest of well-defined and contrasted nomenclatures as optional (LUCAS, SEEA, nationals…) • Metadata: INSPIRE + PLAN4all • TESTING!

14. Towards harmonization First results 1 1 2 2 TASK 2.1 3 3 D 2.3 D 2.4 TASK 2.2

15. WMS Detailed guide according to the software choice of every partner Requirements, WMS version, format, Reference systems Detailed guide for the implementation of CSW in the Geoportal Description of the functionality and arquitecture of the Geoportal- spread WMServices- Harmonized Data D 2.3 Preliminary design and specifications of the harmonized data sharing infrastructure to be implemented First results

16. To be able to visualize on the HLANDATA Geoportal the harmonized LU/LC data through WMS created by each data provider. Each data provider must create his own WMS for publishing harmonized LC/LU data D 2.4 Validated harmonized data sharing infrastructure from all data providers partners Next steps

17. Collaborating with INSPIRE Synergies: knowledge, resources Make possible user´s requirements Conclusions

18. Thank you for your attention!