1 / 23

Wikipedia in the spotlight

Wikipedia in the spotlight. Why study Wikipedia?. As a first step into understanding communities that depend on user contributions… All have novel intellectual property licensing. Exciting, but easy to be confused.

purity
Download Presentation

Wikipedia in the spotlight

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wikipedia in the spotlight

  2. Why study Wikipedia? • As a first step into understanding communities that depend on user contributions… • All have novel intellectual property licensing. • Exciting, but easy to be confused. • Many open source project cannot be appreciated without examining a complex code base. • In contrast, Wikipedia is accessible. Thus, it offers first step into developing an understanding…

  3. Wikipedia in 2009

  4. We examine the organization in summer of 2009 • Sue Gardner, director: “It is time for us to grow up a little bit.” • Top ten web site. • Mass market media coverage. • What needs to grow up, if anything? • Game plan: How does it work? • Myths, fact and misunderstandings. • What issues do they need to consider?

  5. Myths, facts and misunderstandings

  6. History • Founded by Jimmy “Jimbo” Wales in 2001. • What happened to Nupedia? • What happened after adapting Wiki format? • Not for profit Wikimedia Foundation started in 2003. • How many paid employees in 2006? • Started scaling up in 2007. How? • Location. Administration. Fund raising. • What else?

  7. What is a Wiki? • What does Wiki mean? • Why for this use? • How the software works. • Restrictions on participation. • Editing. • History pages. • Recent changes. • Search functions. • What/who is a Wikipedian?

  8. Norms for Wikipedia startwith Linus’ Law • What Linus Torvald said: • “Given a large enough beta-test and code-developer base, almost every problem will be characterized quickly and the fix obvious to someone.” • Eric Raymond coined a popular rendition… • “Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.” • Ever since… • Competing interpretations about what this aphorism means….

  9. A sample of Eric Raymond • Perhaps this just goes to show … • Every social movement needs someone pithy to find a popular phrase that resonates with the broader goals of the movement…

  10. Two interpretations of Linus’ law… ideas or investment? • Accumulating ideas (about building s/w): • What is the best way to accumulate ideas about how to create a new piece of software? • Sampling ideas from a wide base. “Reduce the role of the single software expert.” Spread it around. • Accumulating investment (which does not deteriorate due to wear & tear): • What is the best way to accumulate the investments in pieces of code that make up a new piece of software? • Gathering investments from a wide base. “Reduce the role of command from above.” Make room for variety of ideas.

  11. Norms among Wikipedians • Shared norms: • A shared belief in Linus’ law. • Neutral point of view. NPOV. • Verifiability. • Not original research. • How does it work?

  12. Why does this work? • How to encourage good behavior? • Wikipedians committed effort. • Wiki etiquette. • Good faith. Civility. Discussion. Dispute resolution. • Consensus & monitoring. • Automated notice for contributors. • Encouraging use of citations. • What else? • Why is this needed?

  13. Virtuous cycle • Virtuous cycle is self-reinforcing… • More users  more eyes  more extensions  more adoption and users  more extensions…. • A form of network effect: Whole grows into greater than sum of any contribution… • Fostering the virtuous cycle. • Personal satisfaction. Friendship and teamwork, Moving to new projects. • What else? • Self-reinforcing with Google….

  14. Summary: Jimbo Wales’ key insight • Make site accommodate both insiders & tourists and the virtuous cycle keeps growing. • Need one type of code for those who do a lot. Make their roles easier to perform. Need different type of code for a large group who makes occasional contribution. • Might get best of both worlds? Why? • Inherently difficult to get right. • A club involving personalities from early/late majority & early adopter/innovator. They must get along. What else? • Astonishing success raised question: can this combination be imitated?

  15. What issues do they need to consider?

  16. Should they worry about contrasts with traditional encyclopedia? • Sources for authoritative text. • “Self-selected” editors & contributors instead of experts. • Guarding against junk science. • Topic selection. • Who assigns responsibility? Consensus as arbiter? • Framing passages. • Editors enforce consistency. Forming the index for the whole. • Tone and presentation. • One expert author v. contributions from all corners. • Emphasis on surprises, quirks, novelties, populism. • What else?

  17. Which controversies should they worry about? • Scope of coverage. Does it matter? • Celebrities. Historical and fictional figures. Geek priorities. • Factual correctness. • Unchecked facts in historical biographies. • What is truthiness when code is not tested? • Who is responsible/accountable for error/defamation? • Use in court proceedings? • A neutral point of view for everything? • Religious figures. Controversial people. Politicians. • Depicting horrific historical events. • Editorial discretion. • Personal vindictiveness by editors. • What are the limits? • What else?

  18. Wikipedia and Steven Colbert

  19. Should they alter the site in order to nurture growth? • Open versus clean. • Inviting new entry. Training new contributors in wiki ettiquite • Vanity entries. Destructive vandals. • When it is not done it can be wrong. Who is responsible? • When authorities get interested (e.g., Chinese censorship, Argentine dirty war, Congressional staff). • How far to extend the wiki concept? • Over 100 languages. • Wikiquotes, wiktionary, wikibooks, wikispecies, etc. • Supporting the broad community • Conferences. On line governance

  20. Continuing expansion • Expansion of range of Wikipedia • Wapedia for mobile devices, • Wikiquotes… • Wikispecies…. • Placeopedia for mashups for location information for articles, • Wikirage (what’s hot), • Wikiscanner (sniffing out self-interested anonymous edits) • Wikipedia selection for schools (SOS charity)… • What else? • Limits?

  21. What needs to grow up? • Professional staff. • Funding. Fund raising. • Monitoring. • Governance. • Transparency. • What else?

  22. Managerial cool down

  23. Broad lessons? • Somebody w/a clear focus… • Jimbo Wales at Wikipedia… • Compelling motive for repeat & occasional participation. • Motives often not commercial. • Blending programmer culture, on-line web culture. • Lightning in a bottle. What could be captured and replicated? • In a commercial context?

More Related