1 / 28

Guided Interactive Discovery of e-Government Services

Guided Interactive Discovery of e-Government Services Giovanni Maria Sacco Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italy sacco@di.unito.it Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? T.S. Eliot, The Rock.

quigleye
Download Presentation

Guided Interactive Discovery of e-Government Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Guided Interactive Discovery of e-Government Services Giovanni Maria SaccoDipartimento di Informatica, Università di Torino Corso Svizzera 185, 10149 Torino, Italysacco@di.unito.it Where is the knowledge we have lost in information? T.S. Eliot, The Rock

  2. e-Government Services for citizens represent one of the most frequent and critical points of contact between citizens and public administrations. THE PUBLIC FACE OF GOVERNMENT e-services represent the only practical way of providing incentives and support to specific classes of citizens. THE FRIENDLIER FACE OF GOVERNMENT

  3. DISCOVERY of e-services rather than plain RETRIEVAL is a critical functionality in e-government systems But it is managed by search rather than explorative technology

  4. TRADITIONAL SEARCH TECHNIQUES DO NOT WORK

  5. Since the vast majority of information is essentially textual and unstructured in nature information retrieval techniques are extensively used both in pull and push strategies BUT…

  6. almost 80% of relevant documents are not retrieved • extremely wide semantic gap between the user model (concepts) and the system model (words) • users have no or very little assistance in formulating queries • results are presented as a flat list with no systematic organization: browsing is difficult or impossible.

  7. RICH SEMANTIC SCHEMATA(ONTOLOGIES) • End-users do not understand them • Agent mediators required: costly to implement, not transparent, hard to understand what they do • Schemata hard to design and maintain

  8. Traditional research has focussed on • RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION • BUT • The most common task is BROWSING: • FIND RELATIONSHIPS • THIN ALTERNATIVES OUT

  9. Finding opportunities/services Finding a job Finding the laws and regulations that apply BUT ALSO Buying a digital camera Finding a restaurant for tonight Finding the cause of a malfunction Selecting a photo Finding a suspect/missing person from a photobank ….

  10. REQUIRE A DIFFERENT INFORMATION ACCESS PARADIGM GUIDED EXPLORATIONANDINFORMATION THINNING

  11. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES Dynamic Taxonomies: the first model to fully exploit multidimensional and faceted classifications Sacco, G.M., “Dynamic taxonomies: a model for large information bases”, IEEE Trans. on Data and Knowledge Engineering, May/June 2000 US Patent n. 6,763,349 (EU pending)

  12. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES Representation Intension: The infobase is described by a taxonomy designed by an expert (the schema) Extension: Documents can be classified at any level of abstraction and each document is classified under n concepts (n>1) No relationships other than subsumptions (IS-A, PART-OF) need to be represented in the schema.

  13. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES What is a concept? A concept is a label which identifies a set of documents (classified under that concept) A nominalistic approach: concepts are described by instances rather than by properties Subsumptions require that an inclusion constraint is maintained: If D(C) denotes the set of documents classified under C and C’ is a descendant of C in the hierarchy, D(C’)D(C)

  14. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES How do concepts relate? By subsumptions (IS-A, PART-OF) By the Extensional Inference Rule: Two concepts C and C’ are related if there is at least a document D which is classified both under C and C’ or one of their descendants Because of the inclusion constraint, IS-A, PART-OF relationships are a special case of the Extensional Inference Rule.

  15. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES Concepts extensionally related to G have a yellow background

  16. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES Concepts extensionally related to G have a yellow background

  17. DYNAMIC TAXONOMIES Important consequence: Relationships among concepts need not be anticipated but can be inferred from the actual classification Advantages: a simpler schema adapts to new relationships (dynamic) finds unexpected relationships (discovery)

  18. AN EXAMPLE Putting it all together… The browsing system

  19. AN EXAMPLE • Initial step: Tree picture of the entire infobase The infobase schema is used for browsing The initial focus is the entire infobase

  20. AN EXAMPLE 2. Zoom on a concept and see related concepts • This is the central operation: • The new focus is ANDed with the previous focus • The entire infobase is reduced to the documents in the current focus • The taxonomy is reduced in order to show all and only those concepts which are extensionally related to the selected focus (filtering)

  21. AN EXAMPLE 3. Iterate until the number of documents is sufficiently small 3 zoom operations are sufficient to select an average 10 documents from infobases with 1,000,000 documents, described by a compact taxonomy with 1,000 concepts.

  22. BENEFITS • Simple and familiar interface (the only new operation is the Zoom, which is easily understood) • The user is effectively guided to reach his goal: at each stage he has a complete list of all related concepts (i.e. a complete taxonomic summary of his current focus) • Completely symmetric interaction: if A and B are related, the user will find B if he zooms on A, and A if he zooms on B (most systems are asymmetric) • Discovery of unexpected relationships

  23. BENEFITS • TRANSPARENCY: the user is in charge and knows exactly what’s happening • EXCELLENT CONVERGENCE  very few iterations needed

  24. BENEFITS • Easy multilingual support (just translate concept labels) • Easy to unobtrusively gather user interests • Easy to accommodate reviews, popularity, etc. • Effective push strategies  dbworldx.di.unito.it

  25. BENEFITS • Simple integration with other retrieval techniques (IR, DB): • dynamic taxonomies as a prefilter: they establish the context for the query • dynamic taxonomies as a conceptual summary: they summarize long result lists

  26. CONCLUSIONS Dynamic taxonomies provide a single and simple access model that solves the vast majority of the information dissemination needs of public administrations In fact they are so versatile that can be used for: laws and regulations, e-commerce, medical guidelines, human resource management, multimedia information bases…

  27. CONCLUSIONS • Universal Knowledge ProcessorHigh-performance dynamic taxonomy engine • Microsoft Windows environment • A set of high performance multithreaded COM objects • Intension and extension in RAM even for large databases (20Mb for 1M documents) • Extremely fast operation: 327 reduced taxonomies per second on a 800K item infobase

  28. CONCLUSIONS THE SYSTEM IS AVAILABLE AT www.knowledgeprocessors.com Thank you!

More Related