1 / 34

Crash Course in Stellar Pulsation

Crash Course in Stellar Pulsation. Ryan Maderak A540 April 27, 2005. Mechanisms. k mechanism Compression of partial ionization zones -> ionization -> small change in T k ~ r / T 3.5 , increase r -> increase k g mechanism

quynh
Download Presentation

Crash Course in Stellar Pulsation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Crash Course in Stellar Pulsation Ryan Maderak A540 April 27, 2005

  2. Mechanisms • k mechanism • Compression of partial ionization zones -> ionization -> small change in T • k ~ r / T3.5, increase r -> increase k • g mechanism • Heat flow into partial ionization zone from higher temperature layers • So, compression -> higher k -> energy buildup -> energy release -> expansion

  3. Mechanisms • e mechanism • Compression -> higher T -> higher energy production rate -> expansion • stochastic excitation • convective turbulence -> acoustic noise -> solar-type oscillations • oscillatory convection • convective + g-mode in rotating stars -> oscillatory modes • tidal interaction • periodic fluid motion -> non-radial modes

  4. HR Diagram Gautschy & Saio, 1995

  5. Main Sequence • Solar-type stars • solar-type oscillations expected • more precise photometry needed • ~mmag • greatest amp. at ~1.5 MSun

  6. Main Sequence • roAp = rapidly oscillating Ap stars • P = 5-15 min, multi-periodic, ~50 mmag • ~2 MSun • magnetically modulated rotational splitting • overlap with d Scuti instability strip, but excitation mechanism uncertain • kg in He II zone suppressed by diffusion of He • convection + B ? kg in Si IV zone?

  7. Main Sequence Gautschy & Saio, 1996

  8. Main Sequence • d Scuti • P = 0.01-0.2 days, 0.003 to 0.9 mag, multi-periodic (up to 12 modes observed) • 1.5 – 2.5 Msun, A0 – F5 IV - V, disk population • non-radial p-modes, driven by kg in He II zone • amp. limited by coupling between p and g modes • “stable” stars observed within d Scuti instability strip • suspected to be very low amplitude variables • more precise photometry needed

  9. Main Sequence • d Scuti http://users.skynet.be/bho/deltascutis.htm

  10. Main Sequence • Slowly Pulsating B Stars (SPB) • P = 1 – 3 days, low amp., multi-periodic • 2.5 – 5 Msun, B3 – B8 IV • kg driven g-modes • can be thought of as an extension of the b Cephei instability to longer periods

  11. Main Sequence • b Cephei • P = 0.1 – 0.6 days, 0.01 – 0.3 mag • majority multi-periodic, a few non-radial • 7 – 8 Msun, O8 – O6 • p-modes, driven by kg in the “z-bump” • metalicity dependent pulsational stability • b Cep strip extends farther blue-ward for higher metalicity stars • b Cep-type variability appears in at least a few cases to be transient • Spica exhibited b Cep variability from ~1890 to 1972

  12. Main Sequence • bCephei http://www.aavso.org/vstar/vsots/winter05.shtml

  13. Main Sequence • Be stars • exhibit photometric and line profile variability with periods of <1 day • found within the b Cep/SPB instability region -> “z-bump” driving • MS 60 – 120 Msun • models suggest e driving from CNO burning • e driving may be one of the factors which determines the high mass cutoff of the MS

  14. Horizontal Branch • RR Lyrae • P = 0.3 – 1.2 days, 0.2 – 2 mag • < 0.75 Msun, A – F, prominent in globular clusters • kg driven, but convective flux is thought to be important • important standard candles for clusters, but the P-L relationship is metalicity dependent • the period decreases as cluster metalicity increases (for fixed Teff) • careful calibration and stellar evolution models needed

  15. Horizontal Branch • RR Lyrae http://www.dur.ac.uk/john.lucey/astrolab/pulsating.html

  16. Horizontal Branch • RR Lyrae • RRab: asymmetric light curves, longer periods, higher amp. • RRc: nearly sinusoidal light curves, shorter periods, lower amp. • RRd: bi-periodic • RRab’s exhibit a periodic change in light curve shape and amp. -> “Blazhko” effect • coupling between B and rotation?

  17. Horizontal Branch • P-L Relation http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/MilkyWay/cepheid.html

  18. Horizontal Branch • “Classical” Cepheids • P = 1 – 135 days, ~0.01 – 2 mag • > 4 – 5 MSun, F at maximum light, G - K at minimum light • stars above 4 – 5 MSun pass through the instability strip during each of one or more blue loops • for ~4 MSun -> bi-periodic cepheid

  19. Horizontal Branch • Classical Cepheid http://www.astronomynotes.com/ismnotes/s5.htm

  20. Horizontal Branch • “Classical” Cepheids • masses from evolution versus pulsation theories did not agree historically, but improved opacities solved the problem • but pulsational models using the improved values give periods that are metalicity dependent • careful abundance measurements are needed to use the P-L relationship accurately

  21. AGB • W Virginis (Population II Cepheids) • P = 0.8 – 35 days, 0.3 – 1.2 mag • M ~ 0.5 MSun • cross instability strip in late HB or early AGB evolution • fundamental or 1st harmonic, driven by He II and H/He I zones • instability strip is wider for metal poor stars

  22. AGB • W Virginis http://www.astronomynotes.com/ismnotes/s5.htm

  23. AGB • RV Tau • P = 30 – 150 days, 1.5 – 2 mag • M = 0.5 – 0.7 MSun, F – G at maximum light, K – M at minimum light • driven by H and He I zones • characteristic “double peak” pattern • resonances between fundamental and 1st harmonic • chaotic motion of multiple atmospheric layers • low-dimensional chaotic attractors

  24. AGB • RV Tauri

  25. AGB • RV Tau • various irregularities • change in depth of primary and secondary minima • changes in period • relatively few known ~130 (GCVS) • duration of phase only ~500yr • believed to be post-AGB/proto-planetary • have experienced significant mass loss • RVb: long term (600 – 1500 day) variation in mean brightness • eclipsing binary? episodic mass loss? dust shell eclipse?

  26. AGB • Mira • P = 80 – 1000 days, 2.5 – 11 mag • low-mass, Me – Se • First variable discovered: 1595 • fundamental, driven by H and He I zones • coupling between pulsation and convection

  27. AGB • Mira

  28. AGB • Semi-Regular • P = 20 – 2000+, ~0.01 – 2 mag, multi-periodic • occupy same part of HR diagram as Mira’s – physically similar • distinguished by amplitude • difference due to mass, composition, age • SRb: power spectra exhibit broadened mode-envelopes • stochastic excitation?

  29. AGB • Semi-Regular

  30. Planetary Nebula • PG1159 (variable planetary nebula nuclei = PNNV) • P = 7 – 30 min • g-modes, driven by C and/or O K-shell ionization • Teff = 70000 – 170000, strong C, He, and O features

  31. Cooling Track • DB-type variable WD (DBV) • P = 140 – 1000 seconds, non-radial • M ~ 0.6 MSun, Teff = 21500 – 24000 • g-modes, driven by He II zone • complicated power spectra • need high time resolution and long data sets to resolve peaks -> WET

  32. Cooling Track • ZZ Ceti (DA-type variable WD) • Similar to DBV • g-modes may be driven by ionization of a surface H layer • lower Teff -> blue edge of instability ~13000K • H rich, with almost no He or metals

  33. Future Work • Larger samples of Cepheids and RR Lyrae’s ---> more accurate determination of metalicity dependence of P-L • Continued high time resolution, long duration astroseismology -> better understanding of interior structure and excitation mechanisms • Better theory of convection -> better understanding of coupling between convection and pulsation

  34. References • Carrol, B.W., & Ostlie, D.A. 1996, “An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. • Gautschy, A., & Saio, H. 1995, ARA&A, 34, 551. • Gautschy, A., & Saio, H. 1996, ARA&A, 33, 75. • “GCVS Variability Types.” http://www.sai.msu.su/groups/cluster/gcvs/gcvs/iii/vartype.txt

More Related