1 / 32

Elaine Worzala Clemson University Charles Tu Lauren Lukens University of San Diego

Essential Elements for a Highly Successful Graduate Real Estate Program: The Stakeholders Have Spoken. Elaine Worzala Clemson University Charles Tu Lauren Lukens University of San Diego Margot Weinstein MW Leadership Consultants LLC The Annual Meeting of the European Real Estate Society

quynn-norman
Download Presentation

Elaine Worzala Clemson University Charles Tu Lauren Lukens University of San Diego

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Essential Elements for a Highly Successful Graduate Real Estate Program: The Stakeholders Have Spoken Elaine Worzala Clemson University Charles Tu Lauren Lukens University of San Diego Margot Weinstein MW Leadership Consultants LLC The Annual Meeting of the European Real Estate Society Stockholm, Sweden

  2. Motivation of Study • Academic and industry divide typically tries to bridge through research • Best practices as far as bringing the industry to the students • Improve graduate RE education • Authors build on extensive former research in field

  3. Research Question What elements make up a top graduate real estate program that enhances practice?

  4. Research Methodology • Survey created on www.surveymonkey.com • Program directors/department chairs invited to participate in online survey • Link to online survey forwarded to stakeholders: • Faculty and administrators • Current Students • Alumni • Board members • Likert Scale 1 to 5, 5=Very Important • 970 responses collected

  5. Participating Schools

  6. Type of Program(n=970)

  7. Type of Respondent(n=970)

  8. Question 1 in the AppendixAverage Rating of the Alternative Courses (Likert scale 5= very important

  9. Average Rating of the Alternative Courses by Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  10. Average Rating of the Alternative Courses by Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  11. Question 2 in the AppendixAverage Rating for Course Delivery Options(Likert scale 5= very important)

  12. Average Rating for Course Delivery Optionsby Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  13. Average Rating for Course Delivery Optionsby Type of Respondent (Likert scale 5= very important)

  14. Question 3 in the Appendix Average Rating for Technical Training Alternatives (Likert scale 5= very important)

  15. Average Rating for Technical Training Alternativesby Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  16. Average Rating for Technical Training Alternativesby Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  17. Question 4 in the AppendixAverage Rating of Extracurricular Activities (Likert scale 5= very important)

  18. Average Rating of Extracurricular Activitiesby Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  19. Average Rating of Extracurricular Activitiesby Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  20. Question 5 in the AppendixAverage Rating of Student Services Alternativesfor all Respondents (Likert scale 5= very important)

  21. Average Rating of Student Services Alternativesby Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  22. Average Rating of Student Services Alternativesby Type of Respondent (Likert scale 5= very important)

  23. Question 6 in the AppendixAverage Rating of Faculty Qualifications/Experience (Likert scale 5= very important)

  24. Average Rating of Faculty Qualifications/Experienceby Type of Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  25. Average Rating of Faculty Qualifications/Experienceby Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  26. Question 7 in the AppendixAverage Rating of Skills and Competencies(Likert scale 5= very important)

  27. Average Rating of Skills and Competenciesby Type of Program(Likert scale 5= very important)

  28. Average Rating of Skills and Competenciesby Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  29. Question 8 in AppendixAverage Rating of Indicators for a Successful Program (Likert scale 5= very important)

  30. Average Rating of Indicators for a Successful Programby Type of Program(Likert scale 5= very important)

  31. Average Rating of Indicators for a Successful Programby Type of Respondent(Likert scale 5= very important)

  32. Opportunities to Expand Educational Research • ERES Educational Conference • Vienna, Austria, Dec 4, 2009 • http://www.eres.org/ • ARES Educational Track • Naples, FL, April 14-17, 2009 • www.aresnet.org • Real Estate Directors and Chair holders Association (RECDA)

More Related