1 / 5

Scaling Political Preferences Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study

Scaling Political Preferences Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Chris Tausanovitch & Chris Warshaw May 21, 2011 CCES Conference. Objective and Method.

rae-deleon
Download Presentation

Scaling Political Preferences Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scaling Political Preferences Using the Cooperative Congressional Election Study Chris Tausanovitch & Chris Warshaw May 21, 2011 CCES Conference

  2. Objective and Method • Purpose: Establish how to best estimate a multidimensional model of citizen ideology in order to evaluate representation, issue-based voting behavior, polarization, etc… • Hypothesis: Asking more and better-discriminating questions will lead to better estimates. More accurate effects can be estimated by careful question selection. • Data: One issue-question intensive CCES module, N=1300. • Method: Ideal points estimated using a quadratic utility item response model: • i indexes people, j indexes items, d indexes dimensions (1 for now) CCES Conference: May 21, 2011

  3. Densities of Ideology From Measures Using Different Sets of Survey Questions Economic Social CCES Conference: May 21, 2011

  4. Effect Size and Model Fit From Logits of Presidential Vote On Ideology (1 is a Republican Vote)

  5. Results From a Subset of “Good” Items • Correlation with full set of items: .94 for economic, .92 for social. • 30 items instead of 142 CCES Conference: May 21, 2011

More Related