90 likes | 156 Views
Effect of Gaseous Absorption. Question: How much error will be induced if a climatology-based correction is used when real-time data is not available?
E N D
Effect of Gaseous Absorption Question: How much error will be induced if a climatology-based correction is used when real-time data is not available? Note: the inherent atmospheric correction error is about 0.001 in reflectance at 443 nm (Gordon, 1997), corresponding to about 5% error in Lw(443) for clear, blue water. This sets a limit for our goal.
Ozone Climatology (1998-2007) January mean January stdev
Ozone Climatology (1998-2007) July mean July stdev
Error in Lt (551 nm) and Lw (551 nm) Assuming 0=45o, =45o, if a monthly climatology ozone is used instead of real-time ozone, there is a 95% chance that the error in the “corrected” Lt(551 nm) is smaller than the value below. A 1% error in Lt(551 nm) is corresponding to about 10% error in Lw(551 nm) [Lt,typical 3 mW cm-2 m-1 sr-1, while Lw,typical0.3]. Errors for the blue wavelengths are much smaller. Note that the error has both signs.
Effect of Gaseous Absorption How about NO2?
NO2 Climatology (2004-2008) Total NO2 climatology used in SeaDAS. Units: 1015 cm-2
NO2 Climatology (2004-2008) Jan – Dec Mean Jan – Dec Stdev Units: 1015 cm-2
Effect of Gaseous Absorption Question: How much error will be induced if a climatology-based NO2 correction is used when real-time NO2 data is not available?